• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前疼痛教育对单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术后患者出院决策的影响

The Effects of Preoperative Pain Education on the Decision to Discharge Patients Following Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

作者信息

Seo Ji Won, Kim Moon Jin, Yoon Sung-Hoon, Paik Kwang Yeol, Park Sun Min, Kang Won Kyung, Lee Dosang, Lee Chul Seung

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Dec;36(6):398-402. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.01.16. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

DOI:10.3393/ac.2020.01.16
PMID:32054252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7837398/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Few studies have analyzed the effects of preoperative pain education on the postoperative decision to discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pain education and management on the decision to discharge patients after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA).

METHODS

We analyzed 135 patients who had undergone SILA for acute appendicitis between March 2017 and April 2018 in a single medical center. Of these, 72 patients (53.3%) had received preoperative pain education (group 1), and 63 (46.7%) had not (group 2). We compared perioperative outcomes and complications between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, and systemic inflammation factors (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein level) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no postoperative complications for patients in either group. Perioperative consequences and pathologic findings were not significantly different between the groups; however, length of hospital was significantly shorter in group 1.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative pain education in relation to postoperative pain management influenced the decision to shorten the postoperative hospital length of stay after SILA.

摘要

目的

很少有研究分析术前疼痛教育对术后出院决策的影响。本研究的目的是确定疼痛教育与管理对单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)后患者出院决策的影响。

方法

我们分析了2017年3月至2018年4月在单一医疗中心接受SILA治疗急性阑尾炎的135例患者。其中,72例患者(53.3%)接受了术前疼痛教育(第1组),63例(46.7%)未接受(第2组)。我们比较了两组的围手术期结局和并发症。

结果

两组在性别、年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分和全身炎症因子(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率、C反应蛋白水平)的基线特征上无显著差异。两组患者均无术后并发症。两组的围手术期后果和病理结果无显著差异;然而,第1组的住院时间明显更短。

结论

与术后疼痛管理相关的术前疼痛教育影响了SILA术后缩短住院时间的决策。

相似文献

1
The Effects of Preoperative Pain Education on the Decision to Discharge Patients Following Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.术前疼痛教育对单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术后患者出院决策的影响
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Dec;36(6):398-402. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.01.16. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
2
Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
Pain after single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术后疼痛:一项倾向匹配分析。
J Surg Res. 2017 May 15;212:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
4
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与三孔阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎术后采用加速康复外科方案的术后结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术与开放手术及标准三孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543.
6
Is single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy suitable for complicated appendicitis? A comparative analysis with standard multiport laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术适用于复杂性阑尾炎吗?与标准多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的对比分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital.小型医院单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Aug;91(2):74-9. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.74. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Minimization of Wound With the Assistance of a Needle Grasper in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用抓针器辅助减少伤口
Surg Innov. 2019 Oct;26(5):536-544. doi: 10.1177/1553350619848555. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Single-incision versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(4):195-203. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.995675. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Laparoscopic one port appendectomy: Evaluation in pediatric surgery.腹腔镜单孔阑尾切除术:小儿外科的评估
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2322-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of continuous wound infiltration on patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management after reduced-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery.持续伤口浸润对采用静脉自控镇痛进行单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术后疼痛管理的患者的影响。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Dec;40(6):564-572. doi: 10.3393/ac.2023.00143.0020. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜低位前切除术采用 ArtiSential 与机器人方法治疗直肠癌的围手术期结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jan 17;28(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02895-y.
3
Wound Irrigation Using Wet Gauze May Reduce Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy.使用湿纱布进行伤口冲洗可能会降低腹腔镜阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的发生率。
Front Surg. 2022 Feb 8;9:813738. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.813738. eCollection 2022.
4
Relationship Between Appendectomy Incidence and Computed Tomography Scans Based on Korean Nationwide Data, 2003-2017.基于韩国全国数据的 2003-2017 年阑尾切除术发生率与计算机断层扫描的关系。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jan 24;37(4):e27. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e27.
5
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与三孔阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎术后采用加速康复外科方案的术后结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy, a Multicenter Randomized Control Trial: A Feasible and Safe Alternative to Standard Laparoscopy.传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术与单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项多中心随机对照试验,一种可行且安全的标准腹腔镜替代方法
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1577-1584. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0460. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW).全球急性阑尾炎前瞻性观察研究(POSAW)。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr 16;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0179-0. eCollection 2018.
3
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.
4
Does Korea's current diagnosis-related group-based reimbursement system appropriately classify appendectomy patients?韩国当前基于诊断相关组的报销系统是否对阑尾切除术患者进行了恰当分类?
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Aug;91(2):66-73. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.66. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001064.
6
Novel approach of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as a solo surgery: A prospective cohort study.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为单一术式的新方法:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Sep;21:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Heterogeneity of European DRG systems and potentials for a common EuroDRG system Comment on "Cholecystectomy and Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries".欧洲 DRG 系统的异质性和建立共同 EuroDRG 系统的潜力——对“胆囊切除术和诊断相关分组(DRGs):11 个欧洲国家的患者分类和医院补偿”一文的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Mar 5;4(5):319-20. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.53.
8
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique.使用传统器械的经脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单工作通道技术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):208-11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f5d.
9
Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.随机前瞻性研究比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与脐部单切口阑尾切除术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):413-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318278d225.
10
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术与开放手术及标准三孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182754543.