de Keijzer Kevin L, Gonzalez Javier Raya, Beato Marco
School of Health and Sports Science, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, United Kingdom.
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264375. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this umbrella review was to provide a detailed summary of how flywheel training enhances strength and physical capacities in healthy and athletic populations. The eleven reviews included were analyzed for methodological quality according to the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Review 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Two were systematic reviews, six were systematic reviews with meta-analyses and three were narrative reviews. Although the included reviews support use of flywheel training with athletic and healthy populations, the umbrella review highlights disparity in methodological quality and over-reporting of studies (38 studies were included overall). Flywheel post-activation performance enhancement protocols can effectively enhance strength and physical capacities acutely with athletes and healthy populations. All relevant reviews support flywheel training as a valid alternative to traditional resistance training for enhancing muscular strength, power, and jump performance with untrained and trained populations alike. Similarly, reviews included report flywheel training enhances change of direction performance-although conclusions are based on a limited number of investigations. However, the reviews investigating the effect of flywheel training on sprint performance highlight some inconsistency in attained improvements with elite athletes (e.g., soccer players). To optimize training outcomes, it is recommended practitioners individualize (i.e., create inertia-power or inertia-velocity profiles) and periodize flywheel training using the latest guidelines. This umbrella review provides an analysis of the literature's strengths and limitations, creating a clear scope for future investigations.
本系统综述的目的是详细总结飞轮训练如何增强健康人群和运动员的力量及身体能力。根据《系统评价方法学质量评估2》(AMSTAR 2)和《推荐分级的评估、制定与评价》(GRADE)标准,对纳入的11篇综述进行了方法学质量分析。其中2篇为系统综述,6篇为带有荟萃分析的系统综述,3篇为叙述性综述。尽管纳入的综述支持在运动员和健康人群中使用飞轮训练,但本系统综述强调了方法学质量的差异以及研究报告过多的问题(总共纳入了38项研究)。飞轮激活后性能增强方案可以有效且迅速地增强运动员和健康人群的力量及身体能力。所有相关综述均支持飞轮训练可作为传统阻力训练的有效替代方法,用于增强未经训练和受过训练人群的肌肉力量、功率和跳跃性能。同样,纳入的综述报告称飞轮训练可提高变向能力,不过这些结论是基于有限数量的调查得出的。然而,关于飞轮训练对短跑性能影响的综述表明,在精英运动员(如足球运动员)中,所取得的改善存在一些不一致之处。为了优化训练效果,建议从业者根据最新指南对飞轮训练进行个性化设计(即创建惯性-功率或惯性-速度曲线)并安排训练周期。本系统综述对文献的优势和局限性进行了分析,为未来的研究明确了范围。