Youth Physical Development Centre, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, CF23 6XD, UK.
Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sports Med. 2024 Mar;54(3):623-643. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01944-8. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
Male youth soccer players competing at a high level will typically engage in large volumes of soccer training from a young age. However, it is not known whether the high levels of habitual training that these high-performing players are exposed to limit their ability to respond to strength, plyometric or combined training interventions.
The primary aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the specific effects of strength, plyometric and combined training with active controls (standard soccer training) on the strength, power and speed characteristics of high-level, highly trained young male soccer players.
We performed a literature search across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus to identify controlled studies that implemented strength, plyometric or combined training in high-level male youth soccer players. Participants were defined as high level or highly trained based on established guidelines related to either competition level or age-related weekly hours spent in soccer training. Studies needed to report at least one outcome of lower body strength, squat jump, countermovement jump, horizontal power, acceleration (0-10 m), speed (15-40 m) or change of direction speed. A meta-analysis was then performed using a random-effects model to determine the magnitude (Hedge's g) of training responses and whether effects differed across modes of training.
From an initial return of 5464 papers, n = 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a total sample of n = 1396 high-level male youth soccer players. Strength, plyometric and combined training resulted in improvements in strength, squat and countermovement jump, horizontal power, acceleration, change of direction speed (all p < 0.05; g = 0.73-1.08, moderate) and speed (p < 0.05; g = 0.40-0.59, small). Lower body strength was the only outcome where training mode had a significant effect (p < 0.05), with plyometric training producing small effects (g = 0.27, p < 0.05) compared with moderate effects for strength (g = 1.07, p < 0.05) and combined (g = 0.75, p < 0.05) training. Prediction intervals for overall effects (all training modes combined) showed that the greatest confidence that future training will lead to positive effects was in the squat and countermovement jump, horizontal power and acceleration (prediction intervals = 0.03-1.81).
High-level, highly trained male youth soccer players can experience positive gains in indices of strength, power and speed from strength, plyometric and combined training, and the magnitude of gains are mostly similar across modes of training. Based on prediction intervals, there is a good level of certainty that future strength, plyometric and combined training in this population would lead to positive improvements in vertical and horizontal power and sprint acceleration.
高水平的男性青年足球运动员通常从小就进行大量的足球训练。然而,目前尚不清楚这些表现出色的运动员所承受的高水平习惯性训练是否会限制他们对力量、增强式或综合训练干预的反应能力。
我们的系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是比较力量训练、增强式训练和综合训练与主动对照(标准足球训练)对高水平、高度训练的年轻男性足球运动员的力量、功率和速度特征的具体影响。
我们在 PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 SPORTDiscus 上进行了文献检索,以确定在高水平男性青年足球运动员中实施力量、增强式或综合训练的对照研究。参与者被定义为高水平或高度训练,基于与比赛水平或与年龄相关的每周足球训练时间相关的既定准则。研究需要报告至少一项下肢力量、深蹲跳、纵跳、水平力量、加速度(0-10 m)、速度(15-40 m)或变向速度的结果。然后使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以确定训练反应的幅度(Hedge's g)以及不同训练模式之间的效果是否存在差异。
从最初的 5464 篇论文中,n=34 项研究符合纳入标准,共有 n=1396 名高水平男性青年足球运动员纳入研究。力量、增强式和综合训练可提高力量、深蹲和纵跳、水平力量、加速度、变向速度(均 p<0.05;g=0.73-1.08,中等)和速度(p<0.05;g=0.40-0.59,小)。下肢力量是唯一一项训练模式有显著影响的结果(p<0.05),与力量训练(g=1.07,p<0.05)和综合训练(g=0.75,p<0.05)的中度效果相比,增强式训练产生较小的效果(g=0.27,p<0.05)。总体效果的预测区间(所有训练模式的总和)表明,未来训练将产生积极效果的信心最大,表现在深蹲和纵跳、水平力量和加速度上(预测区间=0.03-1.81)。
高水平、高度训练的年轻男性足球运动员可以从力量、增强式和综合训练中获得力量、功率和速度方面的积极收益,并且不同训练模式之间的收益幅度大多相似。基于预测区间,未来在该人群中进行力量、增强式和综合训练,很有可能会导致垂直和水平力量以及冲刺加速度的积极改善。