Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Jun 1;90(2):146-153. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002942.
A better understanding why people living with HIV (PLHIV) become lost to follow-up (LTFU) and determining who is LTFU in a program setting is needed to attain HIV epidemic control.
This retrospective cross-sectional study used an evidence-sampling approach to select health facilities and LTFU patients from a large HIV program supporting 61 health facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Eligible PLHIV included adults 18 years and older with at least 1 clinic visit between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018, and were LTFU (no clinical contact for ≥90 days after their last expected clinic visit). From March to June 2019, demographic and clinical variables were collected from a sample of LTFU patient files at 12 health facilities. Patient care status and retention outcomes were determined through program tracing.
Of 787 LTFU patients selected and traced, 36% were male, median age was 30.5 years (interquartile range: 24.6-38.0), and 78% had their vital status confirmed with 560 (92%) alive and 52 (8%) deceased. Among 499 (89.0%) with a retention outcome, 233 (46.7%) had stopped care while 266 (53.3%) had self-transferred to another facility. Among those who had stopped care, psychosocial reasons were most common {65.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9 to 71.1]} followed by structural reasons [29.6% (95% CI: 24.1 to 35.8)] and clinic-based reasons [3.0% (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.2)].
We found that more than half of patients LTFU were receiving HIV care elsewhere, leading to a higher overall patient retention rate than routinely reported. Similar strategies could be considered to improve the accuracy of reporting retention in HIV care.
为了实现艾滋病疫情控制,需要更好地了解艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)失访的原因,并确定在项目环境中哪些人处于失访状态。
本回顾性横断面研究采用证据抽样方法,从肯尼亚基苏木县一个支持 61 个卫生机构的大型艾滋病项目中选择卫生机构和失访患者。
合格的 PLHIV 包括年龄在 18 岁及以上、在 2016 年 9 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日期间至少有 1 次就诊记录且失访(最后一次预期就诊后 90 天以上无临床接触)。2019 年 3 月至 6 月,从 12 家卫生机构的失访患者档案中收集人口统计学和临床变量。通过项目追踪确定患者的护理状况和保留结果。
在 787 名选定并追踪的失访患者中,36%为男性,中位年龄为 30.5 岁(四分位间距:24.6-38.0),78%的患者生存状况得到确认,其中 560 人(92%)存活,52 人(8%)死亡。在 499 名有保留结果的患者中,233 人(46.7%)停止护理,266 人(53.3%)自行转至其他机构。在停止护理的患者中,最常见的原因是心理社会原因[65.2%(95%置信区间:58.9 至 71.1)],其次是结构原因[29.6%(95%置信区间:24.1 至 35.8)]和诊所原因[3.0%(95%置信区间:1.4 至 6.2)]。
我们发现,超过一半的失访患者正在接受其他地方的艾滋病护理,导致总体患者保留率高于常规报告。可以考虑采取类似策略来提高艾滋病护理保留率报告的准确性。