• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期结肠直肠手术的成本驱动因素:一项回顾性队列分析

Cost Drivers of Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

作者信息

Ranney Stephen E, Atherly Adam J, Cataldo Peter A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont.

Discipline of Surgery School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin Ireland.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Apr 1;66(4):609-616. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002267. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000002267
PMID:35213878
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery is expensive. Few studies have evaluated complications as an economic cost driver, and there is little evidence comparing multiple cost drivers of colorectal surgery to determine the most effective means of reducing total cost.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effects of surgical techniques, use of enhanced recovery protocols, and presence or absence of complications on the total cost of hospitalization for elective colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort analysis using data from 2011 to 2018 was performed. The primary end point was a mean cost per hospitalization. The cost was compared between patients who experienced minimally invasive versus open surgeries, enhanced recovery after surgery protocols versus not, and complications versus none.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in the Northeastern United States.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who have undergone elective colorectal surgery were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome for this study was the mean cost per hospitalization calculated using inpatient cost based on the total cost of the episode of care.

RESULTS

A total of 1039 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The average cost of all hospitalizations was $19,801. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that enhanced recovery protocols substantially lowered the cost of care by $6392 ( p = 0.001), whereas complications increased the cost of care by $16,780 per episode ( p < 0.001). When complications occurred, enhanced recovery protocols reduced the cost by $17,963 ( p = 0.010).

LIMITATIONS

This retrospective cohort study performed at a single institution has inherent limitations, including confounding and selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

For elective colorectal surgery, complications are associated with significantly increased costs. Avoiding complications should be a priority to reduce costs. Enhanced recovery protocols are associated with significantly reduced costs. Surgeons should focus future research efforts on improving protocols and processes that decrease postoperative complications to improve patient outcomes and to reduce costs associated with elective colorectal hospitalizations. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B927 .

FACTORES DE COSTO DE LA CIRUGA ELECTIVA DE COLON Y RECTO UN ANLISIS DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVE

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía colorrectal es costosa. Pocos estudios han examinado las complicaciones como un factor de costo económico, y hay poca evidencia que compare múltiples factores de costo de la cirugía colorrectal para determinar los medios más efectivos para reducir el costo total.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar los efectos de las técnicas quirúrgicas, el uso de protocolos de enhanced recovery y la presencia o ausencia de complicaciones en el costo total de hospitalización por cirugía colorrectal electiva.DISEÑO:Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de cohortes utilizando data del 2011-2018. El punto principal fue el costo medio por hospitalización. Se comparó el costo entre los pacientes que experimentaron: cirugías mínimamente invasivas versus abiertas, protocolos de enhanced recovery después de la cirugía versus no, y complicaciones versus no.FUENTE DE DATOS:Se consultó la base de datos financiera y contable del hospital y el registro médico electrónico para la obtencion de datos.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un hospital docente afiliado a una universidad en el noreste de los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal de este estudio fue el costo medio por hospitalización calculado utilizando el costo de hospitalización basado en el costo total del episodio de atención.RESULTADOS:Un total de 1.039 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. El costo promedio de todas las hospitalizaciones fue de $19801. El análisis multivariante demostró que los protocolos de enhanced recovery redujeron sustancialmente el costo de la atención en $6392 ( p = 0,001), mientras que las complicaciones aumentaron el costo en $16780 por episodio ( p < 0,001). Cuando ocurrieron complicaciones, los protocolos de enhanced recovery redujeron el costo en $17963 ( p = 0,010).LIMITACIONES:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo realizado en una sola institución y tiene limitaciones inherentes que incluyen confusión y sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B927 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

摘要

背景

结直肠手术费用高昂。很少有研究将并发症评估为经济成本驱动因素,而且几乎没有证据比较结直肠手术的多个成本驱动因素以确定降低总成本的最有效方法。

目的

本研究旨在确定手术技术、强化康复方案的使用以及并发症的有无对择期结直肠手术住院总成本的影响。

设计

采用2011年至2018年的数据进行回顾性队列分析。主要终点是每次住院的平均费用。比较了接受微创手术与开放手术、术后强化康复方案与未接受该方案、出现并发症与未出现并发症的患者之间的费用。

地点

本研究在美国东北部一家大学附属教学医院进行。

患者

纳入接受择期结直肠手术的成年患者。

主要观察指标

本研究的主要结局是根据护理期间的总成本计算的住院平均费用。

结果

共有1039名患者符合纳入标准。所有住院的平均费用为19,801美元。多变量分析表明,强化康复方案使护理成本大幅降低6392美元(p = 0.001),而并发症使每次护理成本增加16,780美元(p < 0.001)。当出现并发症时,强化康复方案使成本降低17,963美元(p = 0.010)。

局限性

在单一机构进行的这项回顾性队列研究存在固有局限性,包括混杂因素和选择偏倚。

结论

对于择期结直肠手术,并发症与成本显著增加相关。避免并发症应作为降低成本的首要任务。强化康复方案与成本显著降低相关。外科医生应将未来研究重点放在改进减少术后并发症的方案和流程上,以改善患者预后并降低择期结直肠手术住院相关成本。见视频摘要:http://links.lww.com/DCR/B927 。

择期结肠和直肠手术成本因素的回顾性队列分析

背景:结直肠手术成本高昂。很少有研究将并发症作为经济成本驱动因素进行研究,并且几乎没有证据比较结直肠手术的多个成本驱动因素以确定降低总成本的最有效方法。目的:本研究旨在确定手术技术、强化康复方案的使用以及并发症的有无对择期结直肠手术住院总成本的影响。设计:使用2011 - 2018年的数据进行回顾性队列分析。主要终点是每次住院的平均费用。比较了经历以下情况的患者之间的费用:微创手术与开放手术、术后强化康复方案与未采用该方案、并发症与无并发症。数据来源:查阅医院财务和会计数据库以及电子病历以获取数据。临床环境:本研究在美国东北部一所大学附属教学医院进行。患者:纳入接受择期结直肠手术的成年患者。主要结局指标:本研究的主要结果是根据护理期间的总成本计算的住院平均费用。结果:共有1039名患者符合纳入标准。所有住院的平均费用为19,801美元。多变量分析表明,强化康复方案使护理成本大幅降低6392美元(p = 0.001),而并发症使每次护理成本增加16,780美元(p < 0.001)。当出现并发症时,强化康复方案使成本降低17,963美元(p = 0.010)。局限性:这是一项在单一机构进行的回顾性队列研究,存在固有局限性,包括混杂和选择偏倚。结论:视频摘要见http://links.lww.com/DCR/B927 。(翻译 - 弗朗西斯科·M·阿瓦尔卡 - 伦登博士)

相似文献

1
Cost Drivers of Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.择期结肠直肠手术的成本驱动因素:一项回顾性队列分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Apr 1;66(4):609-616. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002267. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Assessment of the Risk and Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery Using a US Longitudinal Database: Is There a Role for Innovative Antimicrobial Wound Closure Technology to Reduce the Risk of Infection?使用美国纵向数据库评估结直肠手术后手术部位感染的风险和经济负担:是否有创新的抗菌伤口闭合技术来降低感染风险?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Dec;63(12):1628-1638. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001799.
3
Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Elective Bowel Resection Before and After Implementation of an Anemia Screening and Treatment Program.实施贫血筛查和治疗计划前后择期肠切除术患者的结局。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Nov 1;65(11):1381-1390. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002488. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Differential Index-Hospitalization Cost Center Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation.手术后加速康复计划实施对住院费用中心的差量指数影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):837-841. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001662.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery.负压伤口疗法预防择期结直肠手术后手术部位感染的成本效益分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 May 1;65(5):767-776. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002154.
6
The Impact of a Narcotic-Sparing Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Postoperative Narcotic Use Following Colectomy.阿片类药物节约型强化康复方案对结直肠切除术后阿片类药物使用的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Aug 1;66(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002292. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
A Mobile Phone App Improves Patient-Physician Communication and Reduces Emergency Department Visits After Colorectal Surgery.一款手机应用程序改善了结直肠手术后患者与医生的沟通并减少了急诊就诊次数。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Jan 1;66(1):130-137. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002187. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
IPAA Is More "Desmoidogenic" Than Ileorectal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.预防性回肠直肠切除术(IPAA)在家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者中的促纤维瘤生成作用强于回肠直肠端端吻合术(ileorectal anastomosis)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Nov 1;65(11):1351-1361. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002172. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
9
Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery After Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: A Multistate Evaluation.平价医疗法案实施后,医疗补助扩大覆盖范围后,择期结直肠癌手术机会仍存在持续差异:一项多州评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Sep 1;66(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002560. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Evaluating the Validity of the Clavien-Dindo Classification in Colectomy Studies: A 90-Day Cost of Care Analysis.评估 Clavien-Dindo 分级在结直肠切除术研究中的有效性:90 天治疗费用分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Nov 1;64(11):1426-1434. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001966.

引用本文的文献

1
Time is money: An analysis of cost drivers in ambulatory sinus surgery.时间就是金钱:门诊鼻窦手术成本驱动因素分析
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 Feb;15(2):120-127. doi: 10.1002/alr.23455. Epub 2024 Sep 26.