• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用美国纵向数据库评估结直肠手术后手术部位感染的风险和经济负担:是否有创新的抗菌伤口闭合技术来降低感染风险?

Assessment of the Risk and Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery Using a US Longitudinal Database: Is There a Role for Innovative Antimicrobial Wound Closure Technology to Reduce the Risk of Infection?

机构信息

Emeritus Professor of Surgery, University of Newcastle; Emeritus Professor of Clinical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

Medical Devices Epidemiology, Real-World Data Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Dec;63(12):1628-1638. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001799.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001799
PMID:33109910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7774813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgical procedures place substantial burden on health care systems because of the high complication risk, of surgical site infections in particular. The risk of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery is one of the highest of any surgical specialty.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, cost of infections after colorectal surgery, and potential economic benefit of using antimicrobial wound closure to improve patient outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort analysis and probabilistic cost analysis were performed.

SETTINGS

The analysis utilized a database for colorectal patients in the United States between 2014 and 2018.

PATIENTS

A total of 107,665 patients who underwent colorectal surgery were included in the analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of infection was together with identified between 3 and 180 days postoperatively, infection risk factors, infection costs over 24 months postoperatively by payer type (commercial payers and Medicare), and potential costs avoided per patient by using an evidence-based innovative wound closure technology.

RESULTS

Surgical site infections were diagnosed postoperatively in 23.9% of patients (4.0% superficial incisional and 19.9% deep incisional/organ space). Risk factors significantly increased risk of deep incisional/organ-space infection and included several patient comorbidities, age, payer type, and admission type. After 12 months, adjusted increased costs associated with infections ranged from $36,429 to $144,809 for commercial payers and $17,551 to $102,280 for Medicare, depending on surgical site infection type. Adjusted incremental costs continued to increase over a 24-month study period for both payers. Use of antimicrobial wound closure for colorectal surgery is projected to significantly reduce median payer costs by $809 to $1170 per patient compared with traditional wound closure.

LIMITATIONS

The inherent biases associated with retrospective databases limited this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical site infection cost burden was found to be higher than previously reported, with payer costs escalating over a 24-month postoperative period. Cost analysis results for adopting antimicrobial wound closure aligns with previous evidence-based studies, suggesting a fiscal benefit for its use as a component of a comprehensive evidence-based surgical care bundle for reducing the risk of infection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B358. EVALUACIÓN DEL RIESGO Y LA CARGA ECONÓMICA DE LA INFECCIÓN DEL SITIO QUIRÚRGICO DESPUÉS DE UNA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL UTILIZANDO UNA BASE DE DATOS LONGITUDINAL DE EE.UU.: ¿EXISTE UN PAPEL PARA LA TECNOLOGÍA INNOVADORA DE CIERRE DE HERIDAS ANTIMICROBIANAS PARA REDUCIR EL RIESGO DE INFECCIÓN?: Los procedimientos quirúrgicos colorrectales suponen una carga considerable para los sistemas de salud debido al alto riesgo de complicaciones, particularmente las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico. El riesgo de infección posoperatoria del sitio quirúrgico colorrectal es uno de los más altos de cualquier especialidad quirúrgica.El propósito de este estudio fue determinar la incidencia, el costo de las infecciones después de la cirugía colorrectal y el beneficio económico potencial del uso del cierre de la herida con antimicrobianos para mejorar los resultados de los pacientes.Análisis retrospectivo de cohorte observacional y análisis de costo probabilístico.El análisis utilizó la base de datos para pacientes colorrectales en los Estados Unidos entre 2014 y 2018.Un total de 107,665 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal.Se identificó una tasa de infección entre 3 y 180 días después de la operación, los factores de riesgo de infección, los costos de infección durante 24 meses posteriores a la operación por tipo de pagador (pagadores comerciales y Medicare), y los costos potenciales evitados por paciente utilizando una tecnología innovadora de cierre de heridas basada en evidencias.Infecciones del sitio quirúrgico, diagnosticadas postoperatoriamente en el 23,9% de los pacientes (4,0% incisional superficial y 19,9% incisional profunda / espacio orgánico). Los factores de riesgo aumentaron significativamente el riesgo de infección profunda por incisión / espacio orgánico e incluyeron comorbilidades selectivas del paciente, edad, tipo de pagador y tipo de admisión. Después de 12 meses, el aumento de los costos asociados con las infecciones varió de $ 36,429 a $ 144,809 para los pagadores comerciales y de $ 17,551 a $ 102,280 para Medicare, según el tipo de infección del sitio quirúrgico. Los costos incrementales ajustados continuaron aumentando durante un período de estudio de 24 meses para ambos pagadores. Se prevé que el uso del cierre antimicrobiano de la herida para la cirugía colorrectal reducirá significativamente los costos medios del pagador en $ 809- $ 1,170 por paciente en comparación con el cierre tradicional de la herida.Los sesgos inherentes asociados a las bases de datos retrospectivas limitaron este estudio.Se encontró que la carga del costo de la infección del sitio quirúrgico es mayor que la reportada previamente, y los costos del pagador aumentaron durante un período postoperatorio de 24 meses. Los resultados del análisis de costos para la adopción del cierre de heridas antimicrobianas se alinean con estudios previos basados en evidencia, lo que sugiere un beneficio fiscal para su uso como componente de un paquete integral de atención quirúrgica basada en evidencia para reducir el riesgo de infección. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B358.

摘要

背景

由于手术部位感染的高风险,特别是深部切口和器官间隙感染的高风险,结直肠手术对医疗保健系统造成了巨大负担。结直肠手术后手术部位感染的风险是任何外科专业中最高的之一。

目的

本研究的目的是确定结直肠手术后感染的发生率、感染成本以及使用抗菌伤口闭合术改善患者结局的潜在经济效益。

设计

进行了回顾性观察队列分析和概率成本分析。

地点

分析利用了 2014 年至 2018 年美国结直肠患者的数据库。

患者

共纳入 107665 例接受结直肠手术的患者。

主要观察指标

术后 3 至 180 天内诊断出感染率,识别感染危险因素,术后 24 个月内按支付类型(商业支付者和医疗保险)划分的感染成本,以及使用基于证据的创新伤口闭合技术可避免每位患者的潜在成本。

结果

23.9%(4.0%浅层切口和 19.9%深部切口/器官间隙)的患者术后诊断出手术部位感染。显著增加深部切口/器官间隙感染风险的危险因素包括多种患者合并症、年龄、支付类型和入院类型。12 个月后,与商业支付者相关的感染相关调整后增加的成本范围为 36429 美元至 144809 美元,与医疗保险相关的感染相关调整后增加的成本范围为 17551 美元至 102280 美元,具体取决于手术部位感染类型。在 24 个月的研究期间,对于两个支付者,调整后的增量成本持续增加。与传统伤口闭合相比,结直肠手术中使用抗菌伤口闭合术预计将使每位患者的中位支付者成本显著降低 809 美元至 1170 美元。

局限性

回顾性数据库固有的偏见限制了本研究。

结论

手术部位感染的成本负担高于先前报道,随着术后 24 个月的延长,支付者的成本不断上升。采用抗菌伤口闭合术的成本分析结果与先前基于证据的研究一致,表明使用抗菌伤口闭合术作为综合基于证据的外科护理包的一部分,以降低感染风险具有经济意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/3e8dbe36a3b3/dcr-63-1628-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/7ef40b6e387e/dcr-63-1628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/f0d025d26580/dcr-63-1628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/c48889037ac2/dcr-63-1628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/3744264ba848/dcr-63-1628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/074db3457cbe/dcr-63-1628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/3e8dbe36a3b3/dcr-63-1628-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/7ef40b6e387e/dcr-63-1628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/f0d025d26580/dcr-63-1628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/c48889037ac2/dcr-63-1628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/3744264ba848/dcr-63-1628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/074db3457cbe/dcr-63-1628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7fd/7774813/3e8dbe36a3b3/dcr-63-1628-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Risk and Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery Using a US Longitudinal Database: Is There a Role for Innovative Antimicrobial Wound Closure Technology to Reduce the Risk of Infection?使用美国纵向数据库评估结直肠手术后手术部位感染的风险和经济负担:是否有创新的抗菌伤口闭合技术来降低感染风险?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Dec;63(12):1628-1638. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001799.
2
Effect of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical Site Infections in High-Risk Reoperative Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.切口负压伤口治疗对高风险再次手术的结直肠手术患者手术部位感染的影响:一项随机对照试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Feb 1;66(2):306-313. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002415. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery.负压伤口疗法预防择期结直肠手术后手术部位感染的成本效益分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 May 1;65(5):767-776. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002154.
4
Modern Trends in Surgical Site Infection Rates for Colorectal Surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Study 2013-2020.现代结直肠外科手术部位感染率趋势:一项 2013-2020 年全国外科质量改进计划研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Sep 1;67(9):1201-1209. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003155. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Oral Antibiotics Bowel Preparation Without Mechanical Preparation for Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgeries: Current Practice and Future Prospects.口服抗生素肠道准备不联合机械肠道准备用于微创结直肠手术:当前实践与未来展望。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Sep 1;65(9):e897-e906. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002096. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
Timing and Cost of Wound Complications After Colorectal Resection.结直肠切除术后伤口并发症的时间和成本。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Dec 1;64(12):1551-1558. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002065.
7
Are Biologics Safe in the Immediate Postoperative Period? A Single-Center Evaluation of Consecutive Crohn's Surgical Patients.生物制剂在术后即刻使用安全吗?一项连续克罗恩病手术患者的单中心评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jul;63(7):934-943. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001649.
8
Improved Prediction of Surgical-Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery Using Machine Learning.机器学习在结直肠手术后手术部位感染预测中的改进。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Mar 1;66(3):458-466. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002559. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Antiseptic Skin Preparation Agents to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: A 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial.抗菌皮肤准备剂预防结直肠手术部位感染的 3 臂随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Nov 1;65(11):1391-1396. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002171. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
Impact of Patient-Reported Penicillin Allergy on Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection Among Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.患者报告的青霉素过敏对接受结直肠手术患者的抗生素预防和手术部位感染的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Nov 1;65(11):1397-1404. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002190. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Transverse colon volvulus following normal delivery: report of a rare case and review of the world literature.正常分娩后横结肠扭转:1例罕见病例报告及世界文献复习
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07559-3.
2
Postoperative outcomes after receipt of ertapenem antimicrobial prophylaxis for colon surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.接受厄他培南抗菌药物预防用于结肠手术的术后结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 4;45(10):1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.99.
3
Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgeries: A Scoping Review of Cohort and Case-Control Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.使用三氯生涂层缝线预防手术部位感染:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e029727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029727.
2
An Effective Bundled Approach Reduces Surgical Site Infections in a High-Outlier Colorectal Unit.一种有效的综合方法可降低高异常值结直肠科室的手术部位感染率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jan;61(1):89-98. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000929.
3
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.
腹部手术手术部位感染的发病率及危险因素:队列研究和病例对照研究的范围综述
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;49(7):402-412. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2024.100819.3338. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Quality check: concordance between two monitoring systems for postoperative organ/space-surgical site infections in rectal cancer surgery. Linkage of data from the Catalan Cancer Plan and the VINCat infection surveillance programme.质量检查:两种监测系统在直肠癌手术后器官/腔隙-手术部位感染监测中的一致性。加泰罗尼亚癌症计划和 VINCat 感染监测计划的数据关联。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 May 25;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03410-9.
5
Effect of Standardized Bundle Care and Bundle Compliance on Reducing Surgical Site Infections: A Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Study.标准化套餐护理和套餐依从性对降低手术部位感染的影响:实用回顾性队列研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 25;30:e943493. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943493.
6
Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models.缝线预防手术部位感染:临床结局的系统评价,同时构建了经济和环境模型。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02187-0.
7
Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.女性在随机对照试验中的代表性不足:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trials. 2022 Dec 21;23(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2.
8
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in colorectal surgery reduces anastomotic leakage and costs: a propensity score analysis.结直肠手术中选择性消化道去污可降低吻合口漏和成本:倾向评分分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2441-2452. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02540-6. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.德尔福共识:预防结直肠手术后手术部位感染的术中技术/手术方面。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Jan 1;234(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000022.
10
Real-World Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Open Colorectal Surgery with Wound Closure Incorporating Triclosan-Coated Barbed Sutures: A Multi-Institution, Retrospective Database Study.采用含三氯生涂层倒刺缝线进行伤口闭合的开放性结直肠手术患者的真实世界结局:一项多机构回顾性数据库研究
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Feb 24;14:65-75. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S297671. eCollection 2021.
美国结直肠外科医师协会和美国胃肠与内镜外科医师协会发布的《结肠直肠手术后加速康复临床实践指南》
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):761-784. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883.
4
Bundles Prevent Surgical Site Infections After Colorectal Surgery: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.捆绑预防结直肠手术后手术部位感染:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1915-1930. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3465-3. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
6
Risk Stratification for Surgical Site Infections in Colon Cancer.结直肠癌手术部位感染的风险分层。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):686-690. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0505.
7
Meta-analysis of the potential economic impact following introduction of absorbable antimicrobial sutures.吸收性抗菌缝线引入后潜在经济影响的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e134-e144. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10443. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection.三氯生涂层缝线预防手术部位感染的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e118-e133. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10445. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update.美国外科医师学会和外科感染学会:《手术部位感染指南,2016年更新》
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jan;224(1):59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Triclosan-containing sutures versus ordinary sutures for reducing surgical site infections in children: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.含三氯生缝线与普通缝线用于减少儿童手术部位感染的效果比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;17(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30373-5. Epub 2016 Sep 19.