Ecological and Forestry Applications Research Centre (CREAF), Edifici C Campus de Bellaterra, 08193, Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain; Consorci Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC), Ctra. St. Llorenç de Morunys, km. 2, 25280, Solsona, Spain.
Consorci Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC), Ctra. St. Llorenç de Morunys, km. 2, 25280, Solsona, Spain; Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, 41012, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114717. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114717. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Degradation, fragmentation, and loss of tropical forests has exponentially increased in the last decades leading to unprecedented rates of species extinctions and loss of ecosystems functions and services. Forest restoration is key to recover ecosystems health and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. However, restoring forests at the landscape scale presents many challenges, since it requires balancing conservation goals and economic development. In this study, we used a spatial planning tool (Marxan) to identify priority areas for restoration satisfying multiple objectives across a biological corridor in Costa Rica. Biological corridors are critical conservation instruments promoting forest connectivity while acknowledging human presence. Increasing forest connectivity requires restoration initiatives that will likely conflict with other land uses, some of them of high national economic importance. Our restoration plan sought to maximize the provision of forest-related services (i.e., seed dispersal, tourism and carbon storage) while minimizing the impact on current land uses and thus avoiding potential conflicts. We quantified seed dispersal and tourism services (birdwatching potential) using species distribution models. We used the carbon sequestration model of InVEST to quantify carbon storage potential. We tested different restoration scenarios that differed in whether land opportunity costs of current uses were considered or not when identifying potential restoration areas, or how these costs were estimated. We showed how a landscape-scale forest restoration plan accounting for only forest connectivity and ecosystem service provision capacity can greatly differ from a plan that considers the potential impacts on local livelihoods. Spatial planning tools can assist at designing cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration plans, identifying priority areas where forest restoration can maximize ecosystem provision and increase forest connectivity. Special care must be paid to the use of adequate estimates of opportunity cost, to avoid potential conflicts between restoration goals and other legitimate land uses.
在过去几十年中,热带森林的退化、破碎化和丧失呈指数级增长,导致物种灭绝和生态系统功能及服务丧失的速度前所未有。森林恢复是恢复生态系统健康和实现联合国可持续发展目标的关键。然而,在景观尺度上进行森林恢复面临许多挑战,因为这需要平衡保护目标和经济发展。在本研究中,我们使用空间规划工具(Marxan)来确定满足哥斯达黎加生物走廊内多个目标的优先恢复区域。生物走廊是促进森林连通性的关键保护工具,同时承认人类的存在。增加森林连通性需要恢复措施,这些措施可能与其他土地利用方式发生冲突,其中一些土地利用方式对国家经济具有重要意义。我们的恢复计划旨在最大限度地提供与森林相关的服务(即种子传播、旅游和碳储存),同时将对当前土地利用的影响降到最低,从而避免潜在冲突。我们使用物种分布模型量化了种子传播和旅游服务(观鸟潜力)。我们使用 InVEST 的碳封存模型来量化碳储存潜力。我们测试了不同的恢复方案,这些方案在确定潜在恢复区域时是否考虑了当前用途的土地机会成本,或者如何估计这些成本。我们展示了仅考虑森林连通性和生态系统服务提供能力的景观尺度森林恢复计划与考虑对当地生计潜在影响的计划有何不同。空间规划工具可以协助设计具有成本效益的景观尺度森林恢复计划,确定森林恢复可以最大限度地提高生态系统提供能力并增加森林连通性的优先区域。必须特别注意使用适当的机会成本估算,以避免恢复目标与其他合法土地利用之间的潜在冲突。