Kelebeyev Saveliy, Davison Wesley, Ford Branden L, Pitman Michael J, Bulman William A
Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Center for Voice and Swallowing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Jan;133(1):147-153. doi: 10.1002/lary.30074. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
The aim is to use a simulation lung model to assess the possibility of performing bronchoscopy through endotracheal tubes (ETT) less than 8.0-mm while appropriately ventilating patients with normal and ARDS lungs in the setting of SARS-CoV-2.
Five SHERIDAN® ETTs were used to ventilate SimMan® 3G under respiratory compliance levels representing normal and severe ARDS lungs. Baseline measurements of peak pressure, plateau pressure, and auto-positive end expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) were recorded at four different inspiratory times (Ti). Three different-sized disposable bronchoscopes were inserted, and all measurements were repeated.
Normal lung model: Slim bronchoscopes in 6.0-mm ETTs resulted in plateau pressures <30 cm H O, and increasing Ti to minimize peak pressure resulted in low auto-PEEP. Regular bronchoscopes in 7.0-mm ETTs had similar results. Large bronchoscopes in 7.5-mm ETTs generated plateau pressures ranging from 28 to 35 cm H O with modest auto-PEEP. Severe ARDS lung model: Slim bronchoscopes in 6.0-mm ETTs resulted in plateau pressures of 46 and an auto-PEEP of 5 cm H O. Regular bronchoscopes in 7.0-mm ETTs generated similar results. Large bronchoscopes in 8.0-mm ETTs displayed plateau pressures of 44 and an auto-PEEP of 2 cm H O.
To mitigate risk of laryngeal injury, larger ETTs during bronchoscopy should be avoided. Our data show bronchoscopy with any ETT causes auto-PEEP and high plateau pressures, especially in lungs with poor compliance; however, ETT less than 7.5 mm can be used when considering several factors. Our data also suggest similar studies in patients with varying degrees of ARDS would be informative.
NA Laryngoscope, 133:147-153, 2023.
旨在使用模拟肺模型评估在2019冠状病毒病(SARS-CoV-2)背景下,对正常肺和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)肺的患者进行适当通气时,通过小于8.0毫米的气管内导管(ETT)进行支气管镜检查的可能性。
使用5根SHERIDAN®气管内导管在代表正常肺和重度ARDS肺的呼吸顺应性水平下对SimMan® 3G进行通气。在四个不同的吸气时间(Ti)记录峰值压力、平台压力和自动呼气末正压(auto-PEEP)的基线测量值。插入三种不同尺寸的一次性支气管镜,并重复所有测量。
正常肺模型:6.0毫米气管内导管中的细支气管镜导致平台压力<30厘米水柱,增加Ti以最小化峰值压力导致auto-PEEP较低。7.0毫米气管内导管中的常规支气管镜有类似结果。7.5毫米气管内导管中的大支气管镜产生的平台压力范围为28至35厘米水柱,auto-PEEP适中。重度ARDS肺模型:6.0毫米气管内导管中的细支气管镜导致平台压力为46,auto-PEEP为5厘米水柱。7.0毫米气管内导管中的常规支气管镜产生类似结果。8.0毫米气管内导管中的大支气管镜显示平台压力为44,auto-PEEP为2厘米水柱。
为降低喉损伤风险,应避免在支气管镜检查期间使用较大的气管内导管。我们的数据表明,使用任何气管内导管进行支气管镜检查都会导致auto-PEEP和高平台压力,尤其是在顺应性差的肺中;然而,在考虑多个因素时,可以使用小于7.5毫米的气管内导管。我们的数据还表明,对不同程度ARDS患者进行类似研究将具有参考价值。
NA 《喉镜》,133:147 - 153,2023年。