• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Making every contact count with seldom-heard groups? A qualitative evaluation of voluntary and community sector (VCS) implementation of a public health behaviour change programme in England.让每个接触都有意义——针对鲜少被关注群体?英格兰志愿和社区部门(VCS)实施公共卫生行为改变项目的定性评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3193-e3206. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13764. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Understanding the implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count' (MECC) delivered by healthcare professionals in a mental health hospital: protocol for a pragmatic formative process evaluation.了解精神卫生医院医护人员实施“每次接触都重要”(MECC)的情况:务实的形成性过程评估方案
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Feb 5;11(1):2174698. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2174698. eCollection 2023.
3
Mapping regional implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count': mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation.绘制“让每次接触都算数”的区域实施情况图:实施阶段、实施策略、障碍和促进因素的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084208.
4
5
Enhancing the implementation of the Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural intervention programme in Ireland: protocol for the Making MECC Work research programme.加强爱尔兰“每次接触都重要”简短行为干预计划的实施:“让MECC发挥作用”研究计划方案
HRB Open Res. 2022 Jan 18;5:6. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13481.1. eCollection 2022.
6
Experiences of implementing the 'Making Every Contact Count' initiative into a UK integrated care system: an interview study.将“每一次接触都算数”倡议融入英国综合护理系统的经验:一项访谈研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):894-903. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad173.
7
Enhancing making every contact count (MECC) training and delivery for the third and social economy (TSE) sector: a strategic behavioural analysis.加强针对第三产业和社会经济(TSE)部门的“让每次接触都有价值”(MECC)培训与实施:一项战略行为分析
Psychol Health. 2024 Jul 31:1-32. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2386289.
8
'I can feel myself coming out of the rut': a brief intervention for supporting behaviour change is acceptable to patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions.“我感觉自己正在走出困境”:针对慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的支持行为改变的简短干预措施是可以接受的。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 29;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06336-7.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Communities against cancer: a qualitative study assessing the effectiveness of a community engagement initiative in improving cancer awareness for marginalised communities.社区抗癌:一项定性研究,评估社区参与倡议在提高边缘化社区癌症意识方面的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):2011. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23179-0.
2
A qualitative exploration of service users' experiences of weight management conversations in a mental health setting.对精神卫生环境中服务使用者体重管理对话体验的质性探索。
PEC Innov. 2025 Mar 22;6:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100389. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
How can engagement with underserved communities be enhanced? A co-inquiry informed model of stop smoking outreach.如何加强与服务不足社区的接触?一种基于共同探究的戒烟外展模式。
Perspect Public Health. 2025 Mar;145(2):97-104. doi: 10.1177/17579139251322314. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Assessing fidelity of design and training of Making Every Contact Count (MECC) in a mental health inpatient setting.评估心理健康住院环境中“让每个接触都算数”(MECC)的设计和培训的保真度。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3335. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20774-5.
5
Mapping regional implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count': mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation.绘制“让每次接触都算数”的区域实施情况图:实施阶段、实施策略、障碍和促进因素的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084208.
6
Experiences of implementing the 'Making Every Contact Count' initiative into a UK integrated care system: an interview study.将“每一次接触都算数”倡议融入英国综合护理系统的经验:一项访谈研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):894-903. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad173.
7
Understanding the implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count' (MECC) delivered by healthcare professionals in a mental health hospital: protocol for a pragmatic formative process evaluation.了解精神卫生医院医护人员实施“每次接触都重要”(MECC)的情况:务实的形成性过程评估方案
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Feb 5;11(1):2174698. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2174698. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving community health and social care practitioners' confidence, perceived competence and intention to use behaviour change techniques in health behaviour change conversations.提高社区卫生和社会保健从业者在健康行为改变对话中使用行为改变技术的信心、感知能力和意愿。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):270-283. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13090. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Realizing policy aspirations of voluntary sector involvement in integrated care provision: Insights from the English National Health Service.实现志愿部门参与综合医疗服务提供的政策抱负:来自英国国民医疗服务体系的见解
Health Policy. 2020 May;124(5):549-555. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
3
What do cost-effective health behaviour-change interventions contain? A comparison of six domains.具有成本效益的健康行为改变干预措施包含哪些内容?六个领域的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0213983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213983. eCollection 2019.
4
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews.动机性访谈在健康和社会保健环境中对成人行为改变的效果:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0204890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204890. eCollection 2018.
5
Are healthcare professionals delivering opportunistic behaviour change interventions? A multi-professional survey of engagement with public health policy.医疗保健专业人员是否提供机会性行为改变干预措施?对参与公共卫生政策的多专业调查。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 21;13(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0814-x.
6
How do members of a fire and rescue service perceive expanding their roles to deliver more health care services?消防和救援服务人员如何看待扩大其角色以提供更多医疗服务?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Sep 30;41(3):593-599. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy148.
7
It's hard to reach the "hard-to-reach": the challenges of recruiting people who do not access preventative healthcare services into interview studies.难以触及“难以触及的人群”:将未接受预防性医疗服务的人群纳入访谈研究的挑战。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1479582. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1479582.
8
Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations.影响全科医疗与志愿及社区部门组织合作的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):e360-e369. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12538. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Contribution of the voluntary sector to mental health crisis care in England: protocol for a multimethod study.英格兰志愿部门对精神健康危机护理的贡献:一项多方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e019238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019238.
10
Interventions for sustained healthcare professional behaviour change: a protocol for an overview of reviews.促进医疗保健专业人员行为持续改变的干预措施:一项综述概述方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;5(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0355-9.

让每个接触都有意义——针对鲜少被关注群体?英格兰志愿和社区部门(VCS)实施公共卫生行为改变项目的定性评估。

Making every contact count with seldom-heard groups? A qualitative evaluation of voluntary and community sector (VCS) implementation of a public health behaviour change programme in England.

机构信息

Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Public Health Consultant, Local Government, North East England, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3193-e3206. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13764. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13764
PMID:35218264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9544506/
Abstract

Making Every Contact Count (MECC) is a national, long-term public health strategy in England. It supports public-facing workers to use opportunities during routine contacts to enable healthy lifestyle changes. This paper reports the findings from an external evaluation of voluntary and community sector (VCS) delivery of MECC in the North East of England, which focused on engaging under-represented client groups. The study aimed to (a) Establish if (and how) MECC had impacted the workforce, including changes to staff knowledge, confidence and behaviour; (b) Identify benefits, challenges and unintended consequences; and (c) Explore outcomes for service users. A multi-stage qualitative design focused on understanding both process and outcomes. The study utilised three data collection methods, including a journey mapping workshop (n = 20), semi-structured interviews with delivery leads, VCS workers and volunteers who had accessed MECC training (n = 11), and focus group discussions with clients (n = 22). The findings illustrated positive early outcomes, including improvements in self-reported staff knowledge and confidence as well as emerging examples of organisational culture shift and individual behaviour change. Alongside this, the data provided a rich picture of barriers and challenges which are examined at different levels-national programme, local programme, VCS sector, partner organisation, worker and client. The research highlights clear successes of the VCS delivery model. However, it is presented as a 'double-edged sword,' in light of associated challenges such as sector-level funding uncertainty and accessibility of MECC resources to diverse client groups. The discussion considers issues related to the measurement and attribution of behaviour change outcomes for brief interventions, as well as fidelity, legacy and long-term sustainability challenges. The recommendations call for system-level analysis and comparison of different MECC implementation models, to improve our understanding of challenges, opportunities and programme reach for behaviour change intervention programmes-particularly in relation to seldom-heard client groups.

摘要

每一次接触都算数(MECC)是英国一项全国性的长期公共卫生战略。它支持面向公众的工作人员利用日常接触的机会,实现健康生活方式的改变。本文报告了对英格兰东北部志愿和社区部门(VCS)实施 MECC 的外部评估结果,重点关注吸引代表性不足的客户群体。该研究旨在:(a)确定 MECC 是否(以及如何)对劳动力产生影响,包括员工知识、信心和行为的变化;(b)确定效益、挑战和意外后果;(c)探索服务使用者的结果。采用多阶段定性设计,重点了解过程和结果。该研究利用了三种数据收集方法,包括旅程图绘制研讨会(n=20)、与实施 MECC 培训的交付负责人、VCS 工作人员和志愿者(n=11)的半结构化访谈,以及与客户(n=22)的焦点小组讨论。研究结果说明了积极的早期成果,包括员工自我报告的知识和信心的提高,以及组织文化转变和个人行为改变的出现例子。除此之外,数据还描绘了不同层面的障碍和挑战,包括国家计划、地方计划、VCS 部门、合作伙伴组织、工作人员和客户。研究强调了 VCS 交付模式的明显成功。然而,鉴于相关挑战,如部门层面的资金不确定性以及 MECC 资源对不同客户群体的可及性,该研究将其呈现为一把“双刃剑”。讨论考虑了与短暂干预行为改变结果的衡量和归因相关的问题,以及保真度、遗留问题和长期可持续性挑战。建议呼吁对不同的 MECC 实施模式进行系统层面的分析和比较,以提高我们对行为改变干预计划的挑战、机遇和计划覆盖范围的理解,特别是与很少被听到的客户群体有关的计划。