Rockliffe Lauren, Chorley Amanda J, Marlow Laura A V, Forster Alice S
a Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health , UCL , London , UK.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1479582. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1479582.
In this article, we discuss the challenges faced in recruiting "hard-to-reach" groups for interview studies, specifically those who do not access preventative healthcare services. We do this by reflecting on the varying success of different recruitment methods we have used in two recent studies; one investigating ethnic disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and another exploring difference in cervical screening non-participation. Engaging new community groups to help with recruitment proved particularly difficult, as did recruiting online. Our most successful recruitment methods included recruiting through community groups with whom we had previously established relationships, recruiting through schools and re-contacting participants who previously completed a related survey. We conclude that successful recruitment is dependent on study awareness and engagement. We urge others to be transparent in reporting recruitment methods in order to benefit the qualitative research community and suggest that details are published as supplementary material alongside qualitative articles in future.
在本文中,我们讨论了在为访谈研究招募“难以接触到的”群体时所面临的挑战,特别是那些无法获得预防性医疗服务的群体。我们通过反思我们在最近两项研究中使用的不同招募方法的不同成效来做到这一点;一项研究调查了人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种中的种族差异,另一项研究则探讨了宫颈筛查未参与情况的差异。事实证明,让新的社区团体协助招募特别困难,在线招募也是如此。我们最成功的招募方法包括通过我们之前建立了关系的社区团体进行招募、通过学校进行招募以及重新联系之前完成相关调查的参与者。我们得出结论,成功招募取决于研究的知晓度和参与度。我们敦促其他人在报告招募方法时保持透明,以便使定性研究界受益,并建议未来将详细信息作为补充材料与定性文章一起发表。