• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响全科医疗与志愿及社区部门组织合作的因素。

Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations.

作者信息

Southby Kris, Gamsu Mark

机构信息

Centre for Health Promotion Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):e360-e369. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12538. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.12538
PMID:29327484
Abstract

Collaborative working between general practice (GP) and voluntary and community sector (VCS) organisations is increasingly championed as a means of primary care doing more with less and of addressing patients' "wicked problems". This paper aims to add to the knowledge base around collaborative practice between GPs and VCS organisations by examining the factors that aid or inhibit such collaboration. A case study design was used to examine the lived-experience of GPs and VCS organisations working collaboratively. Four cases, each consisting of a GP and a VCS organisation with whom they work collaboratively, were identified. Interviews (n = 18) and a focus group (n = 1) were conducted with staff within each organisation. Transcribed data were analysed thematically. Whilet there are similarities across cases in their use of, for example, Health Trainers and social prescribing, the form and function of GP-VCS collaborations were unique to their local context. The identified factors affecting GP-VCS collaboration reflect those found in previous service evaluations and the broader literature on partnership working; shared understanding, time and resources, trust, strong leadership, operational systems and governance and the "negotiation" of professional boundaries. While the current political environment may represent an opportunity for collaborations to develop, there are issues yet to be resolved before collaboration-especially more holistic and integrated approaches-becomes systematically embedded into practice.

摘要

全科医疗(GP)与志愿及社区部门(VCS)组织之间的合作日益受到推崇,被视为一种初级保健以更少资源做更多事情并解决患者“棘手问题”的方式。本文旨在通过研究促进或阻碍此类合作的因素,来增加围绕全科医生与VCS组织之间合作实践的知识库。采用案例研究设计来考察全科医生与VCS组织合作的实际经验。确定了四个案例,每个案例都由一名全科医生和一个与之合作的VCS组织组成。对每个组织的工作人员进行了访谈(n = 18)和一次焦点小组讨论(n = 1)。对转录的数据进行了主题分析。虽然各案例在使用例如健康培训师和社会处方等方面存在相似之处,但全科医生与VCS合作的形式和功能因当地情况而异。确定的影响全科医生与VCS合作的因素反映了先前服务评估以及关于伙伴关系工作的更广泛文献中所发现的因素;共同理解、时间和资源、信任、强有力的领导、运营系统和治理以及专业界限的“协商”。虽然当前的政治环境可能为合作发展提供机会,但在合作——尤其是更全面和综合的方法——系统地融入实践之前,仍有一些问题有待解决。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations.影响全科医疗与志愿及社区部门组织合作的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):e360-e369. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12538. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation.边界跨越者在提供协作式护理中的作用:一项过程评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 29;17:96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0501-4.
3
Context, complexity and cross-pollination: Nursing leaders' views of the role of the voluntary and community sector in nurse education.背景、复杂性与交叉授粉:护理领导者对志愿和社区部门在护士教育中作用的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104732. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs.一项关于有言语、语言和沟通需求儿童的跨专业协作共同实践社会资本的定性案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):514-527. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
5
Barriers and facilitators to partnership working between Early Intervention Services and the voluntary and community sector.早期干预服务机构与志愿及社区部门合作的障碍与促进因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Sep;16(5):493-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00760.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
6
Front-line perspectives on 'joined-up' working relationships: a qualitative study of social prescribing in the west of Scotland.“联合”工作关系的一线观点:对苏格兰西部社会处方的定性研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jan;25(1):194-203. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12290. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
7
8
Pharmacists in general practice: a qualitative interview case study of stakeholders' experiences in a West London GP federation.全科医疗中的药剂师:对伦敦西部一家全科医生联合会中利益相关者经历的定性访谈案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3056-3.
9
General practitioners' views of clinically led commissioning: cross-sectional survey in England.全科医生对临床主导的医疗服务委托的看法:英格兰的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 8;7(6):e015464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015464.
10
Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.培养基于证据的临床护理领导力的能力:执行联合辅导和小组临床督导对优质患者服务的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00750.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of participants and organisers of a social prescribing programme for hospital staff through horticulture (SP4S-H) in the community hospitals in Singapore: a qualitative study.新加坡社区医院针对医院工作人员开展的园艺社会处方项目(SP4S-H)参与者与组织者的看法:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 22;15(4):e088160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088160.
2
A Qualitative Study of National Perspectives on Advancing Social Prescribing Using Co-Design in Canada.利用共同设计在加拿大推进社会处方的国家观点定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14144. doi: 10.1111/hex.14144.
3
Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.
在葡萄牙的基层医疗单位实施社会处方计划:一项从参与该计划实施的利益相关者角度探索促进因素、障碍和经验教训的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306404. eCollection 2024.
4
Critical perspectives on Arts on Prescription.对艺术处方的批判性观点。
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Nov;144(6):363-368. doi: 10.1177/17579139231170776. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Constituting link working through choice and care: An ethnographic account of front-line social prescribing.通过选择和关怀构成联系:一线社会处方的民族志描述。
Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Feb;45(2):279-297. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13569. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
6
'He called me out of the blue': An ethnographic exploration of contrasting temporalities in a social prescribing intervention.“他突然给我打电话”:一项社会处方干预中对比鲜明的时间性的民族志探索。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jul;44(7):1149-1166. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13482. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
What does the literature mean by social prescribing? A critical review using discourse analysis.文献中提到的“社会处方”是什么意思?运用话语分析的批判性回顾。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):848-868. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13468. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Making every contact count with seldom-heard groups? A qualitative evaluation of voluntary and community sector (VCS) implementation of a public health behaviour change programme in England.让每个接触都有意义——针对鲜少被关注群体?英格兰志愿和社区部门(VCS)实施公共卫生行为改变项目的定性评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3193-e3206. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13764. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
9
Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the literature.基于初级保健的干预措施,以满足贫困患者的财务需求:文献综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Oct 7;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01546-8.
10
Integrated Care in the Community: The Case of the (Older Adult Care Programme) in Belo Horizonte-Minas Gerais, BRA.社区综合护理:以巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特市的(老年护理项目)为例
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 21;21(2):28. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5619.