Xin Qilong, Yuan Robin K, Zitting Kirsi-Marja, Wang Wei, Purcell Shaun M, Vujovic Nina, Ronda Joseph M, Quan Stuart F, Williams Jonathan S, Buxton Orfeu M, Duffy Jeanne F, Czeisler Charles A
Department of Medicine and Neurology, Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sleep. 2022 Jul 11;45(7). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsac046.
Chronic sleep restriction (CSR) has been associated with adverse effects including cognitive impairment and increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Yet, sleep restriction therapy is an essential component of most behavioral treatments for insomnia. Moreover, little is known about the impact of CSR on sleep continuity and structure in healthy people whose need for sleep is satiated. We investigated the impact of CSR on sleep continuity and structure in nine healthy participants. They had 4 nights of sleep extension, 2 nights of post-extension sleep, 21 nights of CSR (5/5.6-hour time-in-bed), and 9 nights of recovery sleep. Compared to postextension sleep, during CSR sleep duration was reduced by 95.4 ± 21.2 min per night, Slow-Wave Activity was significantly increased, and sleep was more consolidated. During recovery, sleep duration was increased by 103.3 ± 23.8 min compared to CSR, and the CSR-induced increase in Slow-Wave Activity persisted, particularly after the 5-hour exposure. Yet, we found that sustained vigilant attention was not fully recovered even after nine nights of recovery sleep. Our results suggest that CSR improves traditional metrics of sleep quality and may have a persistent impact on sleep depth, which is consistent with the reported benefits on sleep continuity and structure of sleep restriction therapy. However, these improvements in traditional metrics of sleep quality were associated with deterioration rather than improvement in neurobehavioral performance, demonstrating that sleep duration should be included in assessments of sleep quality. These results have implications for the long-term use of sleep restriction in the behavioral treatment of insomnia. Clinical Trial Registration: Impact of Chronic Circadian Disruption vs. Chronic Sleep Restriction on Metabolism (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/; #NCT02171273).
长期睡眠限制(CSR)已被证实与包括认知障碍、糖尿病风险增加以及心血管疾病等不良影响相关。然而,睡眠限制疗法却是大多数失眠行为治疗的重要组成部分。此外,对于睡眠需求得到满足的健康人群,CSR对睡眠连续性和结构的影响却知之甚少。我们研究了CSR对9名健康参与者睡眠连续性和结构的影响。他们经历了4晚的睡眠延长、2晚的延长后睡眠、21晚的CSR(卧床时间为5/5.6小时)以及9晚的恢复性睡眠。与延长后睡眠相比,在CSR期间,每晚睡眠时间减少了95.4±21.2分钟,慢波活动显著增加,睡眠更加巩固。在恢复阶段,与CSR相比,睡眠时间增加了103.3±23.8分钟,且CSR引起的慢波活动增加持续存在,尤其是在5小时暴露后。然而,我们发现即使经过9晚的恢复性睡眠,持续警觉注意力仍未完全恢复。我们的结果表明,CSR改善了传统的睡眠质量指标,并且可能对睡眠深度产生持续影响,这与睡眠限制疗法对睡眠连续性和结构的报道益处一致。然而,这些传统睡眠质量指标的改善与神经行为表现的恶化而非改善相关,这表明睡眠时间应纳入睡眠质量评估中。这些结果对失眠行为治疗中睡眠限制的长期使用具有启示意义。临床试验注册:慢性昼夜节律紊乱与慢性睡眠限制对代谢的影响(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/; #NCT02171273)。