Suppr超能文献

睡眠限制反复循环期间睡眠结构的变化:稳定和可变短睡眠时间表之间的比较。

Changes in sleep architecture during recurrent cycles of sleep restriction: a comparison between stable and variable short sleep schedules.

作者信息

Koa Tiffany B, Ong Ju Lynn, Lo June C

机构信息

Centre for Sleep and Cognition and Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sleep Adv. 2025 Mar 15;6(2):zpaf016. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf016. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine how sleep architecture changes over successive cycles of restricted and recovery sleep in young adults, and to determine whether sleep-restricted schedules with differing night-to-night variability in sleep durations lead to different sleep physiological responses.

METHODS

In this 15-night laboratory-based study, 52 healthy young adults (25 males, age: 21-28) were randomly assigned to one of three sleep schedules: stable short, variable short, or control. They underwent two baseline nights of 8-h time-in-bed (TIB), followed by two cycles of "weekday" sleep opportunity manipulation and "weekend" recovery (8-h TIB). During each manipulation period, the stable short sleep and the control groups received 6-h and 8-h TIBs each night, respectively, while the variable short sleep group received 8-h, 4-h, 8-h, 4-h, and 6-h TIBs from the first to the fifth night. Polysomnography was conducted every night.

RESULTS

Sleep architecture changes induced by both short sleep schedules returned to baseline levels following the first or second recovery night and were largely similar between the first and second periods of sleep restriction. Sleep parameters averaged across each sleep restriction or recovery period showed no significant differences between the two short sleep groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar sleep physiological responses in the two sleep restriction periods suggest that in young adults, sleep architecture does not adapt to recurrent weeks of moderate partial sleep loss, and such sleep patterns did not have compounding effects on sleep architecture. Furthermore, overall, increasing night-to-night variability in sleep duration did not have much additional impact on sleep physiological responses relative to a stable short sleep schedule.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Performance, Mood, and Brain and Metabolic Functions During Different Sleep Schedules (STAVAR), https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662, NCT04731662.

摘要

研究目的

研究年轻成年人在连续的受限睡眠和恢复睡眠周期中睡眠结构如何变化,并确定每晚睡眠时间变化程度不同的睡眠受限时间表是否会导致不同的睡眠生理反应。

方法

在这项为期15晚的基于实验室的研究中,52名健康的年轻成年人(25名男性,年龄21 - 28岁)被随机分配到三种睡眠时间表之一:稳定短睡眠、可变短睡眠或对照组。他们先经历两个8小时卧床时间(TIB)的基线夜晚,然后进行两个周期的“工作日”睡眠机会操控和“周末”恢复(8小时TIB)。在每个操控阶段,稳定短睡眠组和对照组每晚分别接受6小时和8小时的TIB,而可变短睡眠组在第一至第五晚分别接受8小时、4小时、8小时、4小时和6小时的TIB。每晚进行多导睡眠图监测。

结果

两种短睡眠时间表引起的睡眠结构变化在第一个或第二个恢复夜晚后恢复到基线水平,并且在第一个和第二个睡眠受限阶段大致相似。每个睡眠受限或恢复阶段的平均睡眠参数在两个短睡眠组之间没有显著差异。

结论

两个睡眠受限阶段相似的睡眠生理反应表明,在年轻成年人中,睡眠结构不会适应连续数周的中度部分睡眠剥夺,并且这种睡眠模式对睡眠结构没有复合影响。此外,总体而言,相对于稳定的短睡眠时间表,每晚睡眠时间变异性的增加对睡眠生理反应没有太大的额外影响。

临床试验

不同睡眠时间表期间的表现、情绪、大脑和代谢功能(STAVAR),https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04731662,NCT04731662

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64cc/12084804/9f2adcc5d73c/zpaf016_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验