Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Sleep. 2019 May 1;42(5). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz037.
Many adolescents are exposed to sleep restriction on school nights. We assessed how different apportionment of restricted sleep (continuous vs. split sleep) influences neurobehavioral function and glucose levels.
Adolescents, aged 15-19 years, were evaluated in a dormitory setting using a parallel-group design. Following two baseline nights of 9-hour time-in-bed (TIB), participants underwent either 5 nights of continuous 6.5-h TIB (n = 29) or 5-hour nocturnal TIB with a 1.5-hour afternoon nap (n = 29). After two recovery nights of 9-hour TIB, participants were sleep restricted for another three nights. Sleep was assessed using polysomnography (PSG). Cognitive performance and mood were evaluated three times per day. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were conducted on mornings after baseline sleep, recovery sleep, and the third day of each sleep restriction cycle.
The split sleep group had fewer vigilance lapses, better working memory and executive function, faster processing speed, lower level of subjective sleepiness, and more positive mood, even though PSG-verified total sleep time was less than the continuous sleep group. However, vigilance in both sleep-restricted groups was inferior to adolescents in a prior sample given 9-hour nocturnal TIB. During both cycles of sleep restriction, blood glucose during the OGTT increased by a greater amount in the split sleep schedule compared with persons receiving 6.5-hour continuous sleep.
In adolescents, modest multinight sleep restriction had divergent negative effects on cognitive performance and glucose levels depending on how the restricted sleep was apportioned. They are best advised to obtain the recommended amount of nocturnal sleep.
许多青少年在上学日的晚上都会受到睡眠限制。我们评估了不同的睡眠限制分配(连续睡眠和分段睡眠)如何影响神经行为功能和血糖水平。
在宿舍环境中,使用平行组设计评估 15-19 岁的青少年。在进行 2 个 9 小时卧床时间(TIB)的基线夜间后,参与者接受 5 个连续 6.5 小时 TIB(n = 29)或 5 小时夜间 TIB 加上 1.5 小时下午小睡(n = 29)。在 2 个 9 小时 TIB 的恢复夜间后,参与者又进行了 3 个夜间睡眠限制。使用多导睡眠图(PSG)评估睡眠。每天评估 3 次认知表现和情绪。在基线睡眠、恢复睡眠和每个睡眠限制周期的第 3 天清晨进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。
尽管 PSG 验证的总睡眠时间少于连续睡眠组,但分段睡眠组的警觉性失误较少,工作记忆和执行功能更好,处理速度更快,主观嗜睡程度更低,情绪更积极。然而,在两个睡眠限制周期中,警觉性都不如在先前的样本中接受 9 小时夜间 TIB 的青少年。在两个睡眠限制周期中,与接受 6.5 小时连续睡眠的人相比,分段睡眠方案中的 OGTT 期间血糖增加量更大。
在青少年中,根据睡眠限制的分配方式,多夜睡眠限制对认知表现和血糖水平产生了不同的负面影响。他们最好建议获得推荐的夜间睡眠时间。