社区老年人虐待与认知功能:虐待史是否重要?
Elder abuse and cognitive function among community-Dwelling older adults: Does abuse history matter?
机构信息
Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; School of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
出版信息
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;297:114835. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114835. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The World Health Organization has identified child abuse, intimate partner violence (IPV), and elder abuse (EA) as common types of interpersonal violence. Research showed individuals exposed to interpersonal violence in one life stage were at higher risks of exposure to interpersonal violence in other life stages. This study aims to examine the relationship between cumulative interpersonal violence and cognitive function.
METHODS
Data were derived from the PINE Study in which 3,157 Chinese older adults aged 60 and above received interviews in Chicago. We used a 56-item modified Conflict Tactics Scale to evaluate EA. Abuse history was defined as exposure to child abuse (before age 18) and/or IPV (age 18-59) measured respectively by the Extended Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream scale. We divided participants into four groups: EA and abuse history (n = 204), EA only (n = 439, reference group), abuse history only (n = 310), and no interpersonal violence (n = 2181). Global cognition was evaluated by episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, and MMSE. Linear regression was used.
RESULTS
Older adults with EA and abuse history (b = 0.147, SE = 0.052, p < .01) or abuse history only (b = 0.118, SE = 0.046, p < .01) had higher global cognition than the EA only group.
CONCLUSIONS
Individuals with abuse history might develop resilience in the face of interpersonal violence in old age through gaining a sense of mastery and developing effective coping skills from prior experience. Healthcare professionals could assess older adults' prior victimizations and recent victimizations to plan family violence counseling and promote healthy cognitive aging.
背景与目的
世界卫生组织已将儿童虐待、亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)和老年虐待(EA)确定为常见的人际暴力类型。研究表明,在一个生命阶段中经历过人际暴力的个体,在其他生命阶段中暴露于人际暴力的风险更高。本研究旨在探讨累积人际暴力与认知功能之间的关系。
方法
数据来自 PINE 研究,该研究对芝加哥的 3157 名 60 岁及以上的中国老年人进行了访谈。我们使用经过修改的 56 项冲突策略量表来评估 EA。虐待史的定义为儿童期虐待(18 岁之前)和/或 IPV(18-59 岁)的暴露情况,分别通过扩展的伤害、侮辱、威胁、尖叫量表来衡量。我们将参与者分为四组:EA 和虐待史组(n=204)、EA 组(n=439,参照组)、虐待史组(n=310)和无人际暴力组(n=2181)。通过情景记忆、工作记忆、处理速度和 MMSE 评估整体认知。使用线性回归。
结果
与 EA 组或 EA 组(b=0.147,SE=0.052,p<0.01)或 EA 组(b=0.118,SE=0.046,p<0.01)只有虐待史的老年人的整体认知更高。
结论
有虐待史的个体可能通过在老年期获得掌控感并从以前的经验中发展出有效的应对技巧,从而在面对人际暴力时产生韧性。医疗保健专业人员可以评估老年人以前的受害情况和最近的受害情况,以规划家庭暴力咨询,并促进健康的认知衰老。
相似文献
J Interpers Violence. 2024-10
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2015
引用本文的文献
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025-6
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023
本文引用的文献
J Aging Health. 2021-3
Psychol Trauma. 2019-9-26
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019-8