Suppr超能文献

大豆、水稻和玉米不同遗传力性状的基因组预测模型。

Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize.

机构信息

Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72704, USA.

Department of Crop Science & Center for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03479-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genomic selection is a powerful tool in plant breeding. By building a prediction model using a training set with markers and phenotypes, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) can be used as predictions of breeding values in a target set with only genotype data. There is, however, limited information on how prediction accuracy of genomic prediction can be optimized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of 11 genomic prediction models across species in terms of prediction accuracy for two traits with different heritabilities using several subsets of markers and training population proportions. Species studied were maize (Zea mays, L.), soybean (Glycine max, L.), and rice (Oryza sativa, L.), which vary in linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay rates and have contrasting genetic architectures.

RESULTS

Correlations between observed and predicted GEBVs were determined via cross validation for three training-to-testing proportions (90:10, 70:30, and 50:50). Maize, which has the shortest extent of LD, showed the highest prediction accuracy. Amongst all the models tested, Bayes B performed better than or equal to all other models for each trait in all the three crops. Traits with higher broad-sense and narrow-sense heritabilities were associated with higher prediction accuracy. When subsets of markers were selected based on LD, the accuracy was similar to that observed from the complete set of markers. However, prediction accuracies were significantly improved when using a subset of total markers that were significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.10. As expected, exclusion of QTL-associated markers in the model reduced prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy varied among different training population proportions.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that prediction accuracy for genomic selection can be improved by using the Bayes B model with a subset of significant markers and by selecting the training population based on narrow sense heritability.

摘要

背景

基因组选择是植物育种的有力工具。通过使用带有标记和表型的训练集构建预测模型,可以将基因组估计育种值(GEBV)用作仅具有基因型数据的目标集的育种值预测。然而,关于如何优化基因组预测的预测准确性的信息有限。本研究的目的是评估 11 种基因组预测模型在不同遗传力的两个性状方面的表现,使用不同标记子集和训练群体比例。所研究的物种为玉米(Zea mays,L.)、大豆(Glycine max,L.)和水稻(Oryza sativa,L.),它们在连锁不平衡(LD)衰减率上存在差异,并且具有不同的遗传结构。

结果

通过交叉验证确定了三个训练与测试比例(90:10、70:30 和 50:50)下观察到的和预测的 GEBV 之间的相关性。LD 程度最短的玉米表现出最高的预测准确性。在所测试的所有模型中,贝叶斯 B 模型在所有三种作物的所有性状中均优于或等于所有其他模型。广义和狭义遗传力较高的性状与较高的预测准确性相关。当根据 LD 选择标记子集时,准确性与从完整标记集观察到的准确性相似。然而,当使用在 P ≤ 0.05 或 P ≤ 0.10 处显著的总标记子集的子集时,预测准确性得到了显著提高。正如预期的那样,排除模型中的 QTL 相关标记会降低预测准确性。预测准确性在不同的训练群体比例之间存在差异。

结论

我们得出结论,通过使用贝叶斯 B 模型和显著标记子集,可以提高基因组选择的预测准确性,并根据狭义遗传力选择训练群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83ed/8881851/136d7c0ed5ed/12870_2022_3479_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验