Suppr超能文献

血管创伤的处理:创伤外科医生与血管外科医生的比较。

Managing Vascular Trauma: Trauma Surgeons versus Vascular Surgeons.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, RinggoldID:12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Vascular Surgery Service, RinggoldID:3998Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2022 Jul;88(7):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/00031348221080427. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Changes in vascular trauma care and trainee exposure to vascular surgery have raised questions regarding who should take care of vascular trauma patients. This study aimed to determine nationwide trends and perceptions regarding the management of vascular trauma amongst vascular and trauma surgeons.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Online surveys were administered to trauma surgeons through the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and to vascular surgeons through the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Society (VESS) and Western Vascular Society (WVS) in February 2021. Demographics, practice-related information, and interest in, experience and comfort level with vascular trauma were queried. Trainees and those practicing outside the United States were excluded. Results were analyzed using Stata/BE v16.1.

RESULTS

247 surgeons were included in the final study population, of which 163 (66%) were trauma surgeons (T) and 84 (34%) were vascular surgeons (V). Vascular surgeons were younger (46 v 51y, < .001) and had fewer years in practice (10 v 17y, < .001). Vascular surgeons had greater experience and comfort with managing vascular trauma, but less interest in both vascular and endovascular trauma care when compared to trauma surgeons. Inability to maintain skillset (27%) and unfamiliarity with techniques (32%) were the most common barriers to practicing vascular trauma cited by trauma surgeons.

DISCUSSION

Despite significant interest in practicing vascular trauma amongst trauma surgeons compared to vascular surgeons, most feel unprepared to do so. Collaboration between vascular and trauma surgeons could close the experience gap and appeal to the interests of both groups.

摘要

目的

血管创伤治疗和学员接触血管手术的变化引发了一个问题,即谁应该负责血管创伤患者的治疗。本研究旨在确定全国范围内血管和创伤外科医生对血管创伤管理的看法和趋势。

材料与方法

2021 年 2 月,通过美国创伤外科学会(AAST)向创伤外科医生以及通过血管和血管外科学会(VESS)和西部血管外科学会(WVS)向血管外科医生在线调查。询问了人口统计学、与实践相关的信息以及对血管创伤的兴趣、经验和舒适度。排除了学员和在美国以外执业的医生。使用 Stata/BE v16.1 分析结果。

结果

最终研究人群包括 247 名外科医生,其中 163 名(66%)为创伤外科医生(T),84 名(34%)为血管外科医生(V)。血管外科医生更年轻(46 岁比 51 岁, <.001),执业年限更短(10 年比 17 年, <.001)。与创伤外科医生相比,血管外科医生在处理血管创伤方面经验更丰富,更有信心,但对血管和血管内创伤治疗的兴趣较低。创伤外科医生提到无法保持技能(27%)和不熟悉技术(32%)是开展血管创伤治疗的最常见障碍。

讨论

尽管与血管外科医生相比,创伤外科医生对开展血管创伤治疗的兴趣更大,但大多数人认为自己没有准备好开展此项治疗。血管外科医生和创伤外科医生之间的合作可以缩小经验差距,同时吸引这两个群体的兴趣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验