• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国香蕉细菌性软腐病致病菌株的基因组比较与表型多样性

Genomic Comparisons and Phenotypic Diversity of Strains Causing Bacterial Soft Rot of Banana in China.

作者信息

Zhang Jingxin, Arif Mohammad, Shen Huifang, Sun Dayuan, Pu Xiaoming, Hu John, Lin Birun, Yang Qiyun

机构信息

Key Laboratory of New Technique for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 9;13:822829. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.822829. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.822829
PMID:35222482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864124/
Abstract

Bacterial soft rot of banana, caused by , is spreading rapidly in important banana growing areas in China and seriously threatens banana production. In this study, we sequenced the high-quality complete genomes of three typical banana strains, MS1 (size: 4,831,702-bp; genome coverages: 538x), MS_2014 (size: 4,740,000-bp; genome coverages: 586x) and MS_2018 (size: 4,787,201-bp; genome coverages: 583x), isolated in 2009, 2014, and 2018, respectively. To determine their genomic and phenotypic diversity with respect to their hosts of origin, they were compared with other . strains, including another representative banana strain MS2 from China. The sequenced strains were similar in utilization of carbon source and chemical substrates, and general genomic features of GC content, and tRNA and rRNA regions. They were also conserved in most virulence determinants, including gene-encoding secretion systems, plant cell wall degrading enzymes, and exopolysaccharides. We further explored their genomic diversity in the predicted genomic islands (GIs). These GIs were rich in integrases and transposases, where some genomic dissimilarity was observed in the flagellar gene cluster and several secondary metabolite gene clusters. Different constituents of core biosynthetic modules were found within the bacteriocin and aryl polyene (APE) pigment gene clusters, and the strains from banana showed different phenotypes with respect to antibiosis effects and colony pigmentation. Additionally, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and prophage elements, such as type I-F and III-A CRISPR arrays and an intact prophage of MS1-P5, contributed to bacterial diversity. Phylogenetic tree analysis and genome-genome nucleotide comparison confirmed the genomic divergence among the strains isolated from banana. Considering these characteristics, MS2 and MS_2014 probably diverged later than MS1, while MS_2018 was different and more similar to foreign strains isolated from other hosts in several characteristics. Strain MS_2018 caused severe symptoms on banana varieties previously considered moderately resistant or moderately susceptible, including varieties of Cavendish ( AAA) and Plantain ( ABB). Our study of genomic and phenotypic diversity raises public attention to the risk of spreading new pathogenic variants within banana growing regions and supports development of predictive strategies for disease control.

摘要

由[病原菌名称未给出]引起的香蕉细菌性软腐病正在中国重要的香蕉种植区迅速蔓延,严重威胁香蕉生产。在本研究中,我们对2009年、2014年和2018年分别分离得到的三株典型香蕉菌株MS1(大小:4,831,702碱基对;基因组覆盖度:538倍)、MS_2014(大小:4,740,000碱基对;基因组覆盖度:586倍)和MS_2018(大小:4,787,201碱基对;基因组覆盖度:583倍)的高质量完整基因组进行了测序。为了确定它们相对于其原始宿主的基因组和表型多样性,将它们与其他[病原菌名称未给出]菌株进行了比较,包括另一株来自中国的代表性香蕉菌株MS2。测序菌株在碳源和化学底物利用、GC含量以及tRNA和rRNA区域等一般基因组特征方面相似。它们在大多数毒力决定因素方面也保守,包括编码分泌系统、植物细胞壁降解酶和胞外多糖的基因。我们进一步在预测的基因组岛(GI)中探索了它们的基因组多样性。这些基因组岛富含整合酶和转座酶,在鞭毛基因簇和几个次生代谢物基因簇中观察到一些基因组差异。在细菌素和芳基多烯(APE)色素基因簇中发现了核心生物合成模块的不同组成部分,并且来自香蕉的菌株在抗菌作用和菌落色素沉着方面表现出不同的表型。此外,成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)和前噬菌体元件,如I-F型和III-A型CRISPR阵列以及MS1-P5的一个完整前噬菌体,促成了细菌的多样性。系统发育树分析和全基因组核苷酸比较证实了从香蕉分离的菌株之间的基因组差异。考虑到这些特征,MS2和MS_2014可能比MS1分化得晚,而MS_2018不同,并且在几个特征上与从其他宿主分离的国外菌株更相似。菌株MS_2018对先前被认为是中度抗性或中度敏感的香蕉品种,包括卡文迪什(AAA)和大蕉(ABB)品种,会引起严重症状。我们对基因组和表型多样性的研究引起了公众对香蕉种植区内新致病变体传播风险的关注,并支持了疾病控制预测策略的制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ab130569e0d4/fpls-13-822829-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/34ffa575a876/fpls-13-822829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/9cecc2be8768/fpls-13-822829-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/9535f3c6fe5f/fpls-13-822829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/6b775ad4e0b1/fpls-13-822829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/a918e01735b1/fpls-13-822829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ef4514783ed9/fpls-13-822829-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/07edfaca6019/fpls-13-822829-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ca33707294ab/fpls-13-822829-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ab130569e0d4/fpls-13-822829-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/34ffa575a876/fpls-13-822829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/9cecc2be8768/fpls-13-822829-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/9535f3c6fe5f/fpls-13-822829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/6b775ad4e0b1/fpls-13-822829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/a918e01735b1/fpls-13-822829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ef4514783ed9/fpls-13-822829-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/07edfaca6019/fpls-13-822829-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ca33707294ab/fpls-13-822829-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a209/8864124/ab130569e0d4/fpls-13-822829-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Genomic Comparisons and Phenotypic Diversity of Strains Causing Bacterial Soft Rot of Banana in China.中国香蕉细菌性软腐病致病菌株的基因组比较与表型多样性
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 9;13:822829. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.822829. eCollection 2022.
2
Genomic divergence between Dickeya zeae strain EC2 isolated from rice and previously identified strains, suggests a different rice foot rot strain.从水稻中分离出的玉米细菌性茎腐病菌 EC2 菌株与先前鉴定的菌株之间的基因组差异表明,这是一种不同的水稻脚腐病菌株。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240908. eCollection 2020.
3
Genomic and Functional Dissections of Dickeya zeae Shed Light on the Role of Type III Secretion System and Cell Wall-Degrading Enzymes to Host Range and Virulence.Dickeya zeae 的基因组和功能剖析揭示了 III 型分泌系统和细胞壁降解酶在宿主范围和毒力中的作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0159021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01590-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Genomic and phenotypic biology of a novel WH1 isolated from rice in China: Insights into pathogenicity and virulence factors.从中国水稻中分离出的新型WH1的基因组和表型生物学:对致病性和毒力因子的见解。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 28;13:997486. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.997486. eCollection 2022.
5
Dickeya zeae strains isolated from rice, banana and clivia rot plants show great virulence differentials.从水稻、香蕉和朱顶红腐烂植物中分离到的玉米细菌性茎腐病菌株表现出很大的毒性差异。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Oct 18;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1300-y.
6
Genomic and Phenotypic Biology of Novel Strains of Isolated From Pineapple and Taro in Hawaii: Insights Into Genome Plasticity, Pathogenicity, and Virulence Determinants.从夏威夷菠萝和芋头中分离出的新型菌株的基因组与表型生物学:对基因组可塑性、致病性和毒力决定因素的见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 11;12:663851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.663851. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of Two Banana Pathogenic Strains Isolated from China and the Philippines.中菲两国分离的两株香蕉病原菌的比较病原基因组分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 22;23(21):12758. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112758.
8
Genomic analysis of the Phalaenopsis pathogen Dickeya sp. PA1, representing the emerging species Dickeya fangzhongdai.Phalaenopsis 病原菌 Dickeya sp. PA1 的基因组分析,代表了新兴物种 Fangzhongdai 属 Dickeya。
BMC Genomics. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5154-3.
9
Virulence Factor Identification in the Banana Pathogen Dickeya zeae MS2.鉴定香蕉病原菌戴克氏菌 MS2 中的毒力因子。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Nov 14;85(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01611-19. Print 2019 Dec 1.
10
Genome Sequence of the Banana Pathogen Dickeya zeae Strain MS1, Which Causes Bacterial Soft Rot.引起细菌性软腐病的香蕉病原菌玉米迪基氏菌MS1菌株的基因组序列
Genome Announc. 2013 Jun 13;1(3):e00317-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00317-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the quorum-sensing system on the phenotypic features and virulence of WH1.群体感应系统对WH1表型特征和毒力的影响。
Biofilm. 2025 Jun 13;10:100295. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100295. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Genomic and phenotypic biology of a novel WH1 isolated from rice in China: Insights into pathogenicity and virulence factors.从中国水稻中分离出的新型WH1的基因组和表型生物学:对致病性和毒力因子的见解。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 28;13:997486. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.997486. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic and Phenotypic Biology of Novel Strains of Isolated From Pineapple and Taro in Hawaii: Insights Into Genome Plasticity, Pathogenicity, and Virulence Determinants.从夏威夷菠萝和芋头中分离出的新型菌株的基因组与表型生物学:对基因组可塑性、致病性和毒力决定因素的见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 11;12:663851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.663851. eCollection 2021.
2
Identification of essential genes for Escherichia coli aryl polyene biosynthesis and function in biofilm formation.鉴定大肠杆菌芳基多烯生物合成和生物膜形成所必需的基因及其功能。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021 Jul 2;7(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00226-3.
3
Understanding thioamitide biosynthesis using pathway engineering and untargeted metabolomics.
利用途径工程和非靶向代谢组学理解硫代酰胺生物合成。
Chem Sci. 2021 Apr 19;12(20):7138-7150. doi: 10.1039/d0sc06835g.
4
An Overview of Antimicrobial, Toxicity, and Biosafety Assessment by Models.模型对抗菌、毒性和生物安全性评估的概述
Front Microbiol. 2021 Apr 15;12:630695. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.630695. eCollection 2021.
5
Type III-A CRISPR immunity promotes mutagenesis of staphylococci.III-A 型 CRISPR 免疫促进葡萄球菌的突变。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):611-615. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03440-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Genomic divergence between Dickeya zeae strain EC2 isolated from rice and previously identified strains, suggests a different rice foot rot strain.从水稻中分离出的玉米细菌性茎腐病菌 EC2 菌株与先前鉴定的菌株之间的基因组差异表明,这是一种不同的水稻脚腐病菌株。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240908. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparative genomics and pangenome-oriented studies reveal high homogeneity of the agronomically relevant enterobacterial plant pathogen Dickeya solani.比较基因组学和泛基因组研究揭示了具有农业相关性的肠细菌植物病原体德氏软腐菌具有高度同质性。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06863-w.
8
sp. nov., isolated from the roots of rice.新种,从水稻根部分离得到。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020 Jul;70(7):4171-4178. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004265.
9
Functional and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Integrated Prophage-Like Sequences in " Liberibacter asiaticus".“亚洲韧皮杆菌”中整合的类似噬菌体序列的功能和比较基因组分析
mSphere. 2019 Nov 13;4(6):e00409-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00409-19.
10
The phytopathogenic nature of Dickeya aquatica 174/2 and the dynamic early evolution of Dickeya pathogenicity.水生迪克氏菌 174/2 的植物病原性及其致病性的早期动态进化。
Environ Microbiol. 2019 Aug;21(8):2809-2835. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14627. Epub 2019 Apr 26.