Suppr超能文献

评估学校课程中进化概念存在情况的框架(FACE)的开发与验证

Development and validation of a framework for the assessment of school curricula on the presence of evolutionary concepts (FACE).

作者信息

Sá-Pinto Xana, Realdon Giulia, Torkar Gregor, Sousa Bruno, Georgiou Martha, Jeffries Alex, Korfiatis Konstantinos, Paolucci Silvia, Pessoa Patrícia, Rocha Joana, Stasinakis Panagiotis K, Cavadas Bento, Crottini Angelica, Gnidovec Tanja, Nogueira Teresa, Papadopoulou Penelope, Piccoli Costanza, Barstad Johan, Dufour Heloise D, Pejchinovska Milena, Pobric Alma, Cvetković Dragana, Mavrikaki Evangelia

机构信息

Research Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

UNICAMearth Group, Geology Section, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.

出版信息

Evolution (N Y). 2021;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12052-021-00142-2. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

Evolution is a key concept of biology, fundamental to understand the world and address important societal problems, but research studies show that it is still not widely understood and accepted. Several factors are known to influence evolution acceptance and understanding, but little information is available regarding the impacts of the curriculum on these aspects. Very few curricula have been examined to assess the coverage of biological evolution. The available studies do not allow comparative analyses, due to the different methodologies employed by the authors. However, such an analysis would be useful for research purposes and for the development of appropriate educational policies to address the problem of a lack of evolution acceptance in some countries. In this paper we describe the steps through which we developed a valid and reliable instrument for curricula analysis known as FACE: "Framework to Assess the Coverage of biological Evolution by school curricula." This framework was developed based on the "Understanding Evolution Conceptual Framework" (UECF). After an initial pilot study, our framework was reformulated based on identified issues and experts' opinions. To generate validity and reliability evidence in support of the framework, it was applied to four European countries' curricula. For each country, a team of a minimum of two national and two foreign coders worked independently to assess the curriculum using this framework for content analysis. Reliability evidence was estimated using Krippendorf's alpha and resulted in appropriate values for coding the examined curricula. Some issues that coders faced during the analysis were discussed and, to ensure better reliability for future researchers, additional guidelines and one extra category were included in the framework. The final version of the framework includes six categories and 34 subcategories. FACE is a useful tool for the analysis and the comparison of curricula and school textbooks regarding the coverage of evolution, and such results can guide curricula development.

摘要

进化是生物学的一个关键概念,对于理解世界和解决重要的社会问题至关重要,但研究表明它仍未得到广泛理解和接受。已知有几个因素会影响对进化的接受和理解,但关于课程对这些方面的影响的信息却很少。很少有课程经过审查以评估生物进化的涵盖范围。由于作者采用的方法不同,现有的研究无法进行比较分析。然而,这样的分析对于研究目的以及制定适当的教育政策以解决一些国家缺乏对进化的接受这一问题将是有用的。在本文中,我们描述了开发一种用于课程分析的有效且可靠的工具——FACE(“学校课程生物进化涵盖范围评估框架”)所采取的步骤。这个框架是基于“理解进化概念框架”(UECF)开发的。经过初步的试点研究,我们的框架根据发现的问题和专家意见进行了重新制定。为了生成支持该框架的有效性和可靠性证据,它被应用于四个欧洲国家的课程。对于每个国家,至少由两名本国编码员和两名外国编码员组成的团队独立工作,使用这个框架进行内容分析来评估课程。使用克里彭多夫阿尔法系数估计可靠性证据,结果得出了用于对所审查课程进行编码的适当值。讨论了编码员在分析过程中面临的一些问题,并且为了确保未来研究人员有更高的可靠性,框架中纳入了额外的指导方针和一个额外的类别。该框架的最终版本包括六个类别和34个子类别。FACE是分析和比较课程及学校教科书在进化涵盖方面的有用工具,这样的结果可以指导课程开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8827349/1d4513990921/12052_2021_142_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验