Wisniewski David, Cracco Emiel, González-García Carlos, Brass Marcel
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Feb 23;9(2):202018. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202018. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Most people believe in free will, which is foundational for our sense of agency and responsibility. Past research demonstrated that such beliefs are dynamic, and can be manipulated experimentally. Much less is known about free will attitudes (FWAs; do you value free will?), whether they are equally dynamic, and about their relation to free will beliefs (FWBs). If FWAs were strongly positive, people might be reluctant to revise their beliefs even in the face of strong evidence to do so. In this registered report, we developed a novel measure of FWAs and directly related FWBs and attitudes for the first time. We found FWBs and attitudes to be positively related, although to a lesser degree than determinism or dualism beliefs/attitudes. Nevertheless, an experimental manipulation technique aimed at reducing FWBs (Crick text) showed remarkably specific effects on FWBs only, and no effects on FWAs. Overall, these results provide valuable new insights into laypeople's views on free will by including a novel measure of FWAs. They also provide evidence for the validity of a common experimental technique that has been rightfully criticized in the literature lately.
大多数人相信自由意志,这是我们的能动感和责任感的基础。过去的研究表明,这种信念是动态的,并且可以通过实验进行操纵。对于自由意志态度(FWAs;你是否重视自由意志?)、它们是否同样具有动态性以及它们与自由意志信念(FWBs)的关系,我们所知甚少。如果自由意志态度非常积极,那么即使面对有力的证据,人们可能也不愿意改变他们的信念。在这份预注册报告中,我们首次开发了一种衡量自由意志态度的新方法,并将其与自由意志信念和态度直接关联起来。我们发现自由意志信念和态度呈正相关,尽管程度低于决定论或二元论信念/态度。然而,一种旨在减少自由意志信念的实验操纵技术(克里克文本)仅对自由意志信念产生了显著的特定影响,对自由意志态度没有影响。总体而言,这些结果通过纳入一种衡量自由意志态度的新方法,为外行人对自由意志的看法提供了有价值的新见解。它们还为一种最近在文献中受到合理批评的常见实验技术的有效性提供了证据。