• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模在线社交网络中多变巨魔的检测。

Detection of fickle trolls in large-scale online social networks.

作者信息

Shafiei Hossein, Dadlani Aresh

机构信息

Faculty of Computer Engineering, K. N. Toosi University, Tehran, Iran.

School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Big Data. 2022;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00572-9. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1186/s40537-022-00572-9
PMID:35223368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8857750/
Abstract

Online social networks have attracted billions of active users over the past decade. These systems play an integral role in the everyday life of many people around the world. As such, these platforms are also attractive for misinformation, hoaxes, and fake news campaigns which usually utilize social trolls and/or social bots for propagation. Detection of so-called social trolls in these platforms is challenging due to their large scale and dynamic nature where users' data are generated and collected at the scale of multi-billion records per hour. In this paper, we focus on fickle trolls, i.e., a special type of trolling activity in which the trolls change their identity frequently to maximize their social relations. This kind of trolling activity may become irritating for the users and also may pose a serious threat to their privacy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that introduces mechanisms to detect these trolls. In particular, we discuss and analyze troll detection mechanisms on different scales. We prove that the order of centralized single-machine detection algorithm is which is slow and impractical for early troll detection in large-scale social platforms comprising of billions of users. We also prove that the streaming approach where data is gradually fed to the system is not practical in many real-world scenarios. In light of such shortcomings, we then propose a massively parallel detection approach. Rigorous evaluations confirm that our proposed method is at least six times faster compared to conventional parallel approaches.

摘要

在过去十年中,在线社交网络吸引了数十亿活跃用户。这些系统在世界各地许多人的日常生活中发挥着不可或缺的作用。因此,这些平台也容易滋生错误信息、恶作剧和虚假新闻活动,这些活动通常利用网络喷子和/或社交机器人进行传播。由于这些平台规模庞大且具有动态性,用户数据以每小时数十亿条记录的规模生成和收集,因此在这些平台上检测所谓的网络喷子具有挑战性。在本文中,我们关注善变的喷子,即一种特殊类型的喷子活动,其中喷子频繁改变身份以最大化他们的社交关系。这种喷子活动可能会让用户感到恼火,也可能对他们的隐私构成严重威胁。据我们所知,这是第一项引入检测这些喷子机制的工作。特别是,我们讨论并分析了不同规模的喷子检测机制。我们证明,集中式单机检测算法的时间复杂度较高,对于包含数十亿用户的大规模社交平台中的早期喷子检测来说速度缓慢且不切实际。我们还证明,在许多实际场景中,数据逐渐输入系统的流式方法并不实用。鉴于这些缺点,我们随后提出了一种大规模并行检测方法。严格的评估证实,我们提出的方法比传统并行方法至少快六倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/8cdf14d1ae5b/40537_2022_572_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/51f7e76da3bb/40537_2022_572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/3e907fe9f5a4/40537_2022_572_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/d286e2d81a56/40537_2022_572_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/7f3ac7987ed8/40537_2022_572_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/e8b06f5de658/40537_2022_572_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/cff1055d9872/40537_2022_572_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/2276d4f10178/40537_2022_572_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/8cdf14d1ae5b/40537_2022_572_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/51f7e76da3bb/40537_2022_572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/3e907fe9f5a4/40537_2022_572_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/d286e2d81a56/40537_2022_572_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/7f3ac7987ed8/40537_2022_572_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/e8b06f5de658/40537_2022_572_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/cff1055d9872/40537_2022_572_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/2276d4f10178/40537_2022_572_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3703/8857750/8cdf14d1ae5b/40537_2022_572_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detection of fickle trolls in large-scale online social networks.大规模在线社交网络中多变巨魔的检测。
J Big Data. 2022;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00572-9. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
2
Troll and divide: the language of online polarization.挑拨离间:网络两极分化的语言。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 10;1(1):pgac019. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac019. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.武器化的健康传播:推特机器人和俄罗斯水军放大疫苗辩论。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions.任何人都可能成为网络喷子:在线讨论中喷子行为的成因。
CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work. 2017 Feb-Mar;2017:1217-1230. doi: 10.1145/2998181.2998213.
5
Online Troll Reviewer Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques.使用深度学习技术检测在线恶意评论者
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Jun 8;2022:4637594. doi: 10.1155/2022/4637594. eCollection 2022.
6
Implicit theories of online trolling: Evidence that attention-seeking conceptions are associated with increased psychological resilience.网络恶搞的内隐理论:寻求关注观念与心理复原力增强相关的证据。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):448-66. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12154. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
Under the bridge: An in-depth examination of online trolling in the gaming context.桥下:对游戏环境中网络喷子行为的深入剖析。
New Media Soc. 2018 Sep;20(9):3323-3340. doi: 10.1177/1461444817748578. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Online information disorder: fake news, bots and trolls.网络信息失序:假新闻、机器人程序与恶意挑衅者
Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022;13(4):265-269. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00325-0. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
Exposing influence campaigns in the age of LLMs: a behavioral-based AI approach to detecting state-sponsored trolls.揭露大语言模型时代的影响活动:一种基于行为的人工智能方法来检测国家支持的网络巨魔。
EPJ Data Sci. 2023;12(1):46. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00423-4. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
10
Haters Gonna Hate, Trolls Gonna Troll: The Personality Profile of a Facebook Troll.恨者自会恨,喷子自会喷:脸书喷子的性格剖析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115722.

本文引用的文献

1
Misinformation warnings: Twitter's soft moderation effects on COVID-19 vaccine belief echoes.错误信息警告:推特的温和审核对新冠疫苗信念回声的影响
Comput Secur. 2022 Mar;114:102577. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102577. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
How social media shapes polarization.社交媒体如何塑造极化现象。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;25(11):913-916. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
The Limit of Detection Matters: The Case for Benchmarking Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Testing.检测限很重要:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 检测的基准测试案例。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3042-e3046. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1382.
4
The False positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research.自动化 Bot 检测在社会科学研究中的假阳性问题。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241045. eCollection 2020.