Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Division of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 9;12:798317. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.798317. eCollection 2022.
A variety of bacteria have evolved the ability to interact with environmental phagocytic predators such as amoebae, which may have facilitated their subsequent interactions with phagocytes in animal hosts. Our recent study found that the animal pathogen can evade predation by the common soil amoeba , survive within, and hijack its complex life cycle as a propagation and dissemination vector. However, it is uncertain whether the mechanisms allowing interactions with predatory amoebae are conserved among species, because divergence, evolution, and adaptation to different hosts and ecological niches was accompanied by acquisition and loss of many genes. Here we tested 9 diverse species in three assays representing distinct aspects of their interactions with . Several human and animal pathogens retained the abilities to survive within single-celled amoeba, to inhibit amoebic plaque expansion, and to translocate with amoebae to the fruiting body and disseminate along with the fruiting body. In contrast, these abilities were partly degraded for the bird pathogen , and for the human-restricted species and . Interestingly, a different lineage of only known to infect sheep retained the ability to interact with , demonstrating that these abilities were lost in multiple lineages independently, correlating with niche specialization and recent rapid genome decay apparently mediated by insertion sequences. has been isolated sporadically from diverse human and environmental sources, has acquired insertion sequences, undergone genome decay and has also lost the ability to interact with amoebae, suggesting some specialization to some unknown niche. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified a set of genes that are potentially associated with the ability to interact with . These results suggest that massive gene loss associated with specialization of some species to a closed life cycle in a particular host was repeatedly and independently accompanied by loss of the ability to interact with amoebae in an environmental niche.
多种细菌已经进化出与环境吞噬性捕食者(如变形虫)相互作用的能力,这可能促进了它们随后与动物宿主中的吞噬细胞相互作用。我们最近的研究发现,动物病原体 可以逃避常见土壤变形虫的捕食,在其体内生存,并劫持其复杂的生命周期作为繁殖和传播的载体。然而,目前还不确定与吞噬性变形虫相互作用的机制是否在 物种中保守,因为在不同宿主和生态位的分化、进化和适应过程中,伴随着许多基因的获得和丢失。在这里,我们在三个代表与 相互作用的不同方面的实验中测试了 9 种不同的 物种。几种人类和动物病原体仍然能够在单细胞变形虫体内生存,抑制变形虫菌斑的扩张,并与变形虫一起转移到生殖体中,随着生殖体一起传播。相比之下,这些能力在鸟类病原体 和仅限于人类的物种 和 中部分退化。有趣的是,只感染绵羊的不同谱系的 仍然保留与 相互作用的能力,表明这些能力在多个谱系中独立丢失,与小生境特化和最近明显由插入序列介导的快速基因组衰退有关。 已从不同的人类和环境来源中偶然分离出来,获得了插入序列,经历了基因组衰退,并失去了与变形虫相互作用的能力,这表明它已经特化到某种未知的小生境。全基因组关联研究(GWAS)确定了一组可能与与变形虫相互作用能力相关的基因。这些结果表明,一些 物种的大规模基因丢失与特定宿主内封闭生命周期的特化有关,这与在环境小生境中与变形虫相互作用的能力的丢失是重复的和独立的。