Faculty of Health Sciences, 61775Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.
106269Institute for Public Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221079683. doi: 10.1177/00469580221079683.
This study examined the perceptions of current smokers on electronic cigarette (EC) use, after exposure to information on EC use and its potential harms from various media and retail outlets. This cross-sectional study is a sub-analysis of the National Study of Electronic Cigarettes Prevalence (N = 4289) using the multi-stage stratified sampling method. Respondents were interviewed face-to-face by a trained data collector using a structured questionnaire printed in both Bahasa Malaysia and English. The analysis included 376 males who smoked conventional cigarettes and/or used ECs and reported ever seeing messages on ECs/vape in various platforms were analyzed using weighted simple and multiple logistic regression. Our findings showed different media types resulted in differing perceptions among smokers towards EC use especially between social media and conventional media. Those exposed to messages promoting EC in social media had higher odds of believing that ECs help people quit smoking (OR: 2.28), the urge to smoke is reduced by ECs (OR: 1.86), ECs are more effective than medication for quitting smoking (OR: 1.96), breathing is improved after using ECs (OR: 2.85), the smell of EC is better than a tobacco cigarette (OR: 2.73), and ECs should be regulated rather than banned completely (OR: 3.08). Vape shops, social, and conventional media provided very different perceptions among smokers towards EC use. Beyond using traditional communication channels, EC promoters have successfully utilized social media to promote ECs among smokers.
这项研究考察了当前吸烟者在接触来自各种媒体和零售渠道的电子烟(EC)使用信息及其潜在危害后的看法。这是一项使用多阶段分层抽样方法的全国电子烟流行率研究(N=4289)的子分析。受访者由经过培训的数据收集器通过印在马来语和英语两种语言的结构化问卷进行面对面访谈。分析包括 376 名男性,他们吸食传统香烟和/或使用电子烟,并报告曾在各种平台上看到过关于电子烟/蒸汽烟的信息,使用加权简单和多变量逻辑回归对这些吸烟者进行了分析。我们的研究结果表明,不同的媒体类型导致吸烟者对电子烟使用的看法不同,特别是在社交媒体和传统媒体之间。那些接触到社交媒体中宣传电子烟信息的人更有可能相信电子烟有助于人们戒烟(OR:2.28)、电子烟可以减少吸烟的冲动(OR:1.86)、电子烟比药物更有效戒烟(OR:1.96)、使用电子烟后呼吸改善(OR:2.85)、电子烟的气味比香烟好(OR:2.73),以及电子烟应该受到监管而不是完全禁止(OR:3.08)。蒸汽烟商店、社交媒体和传统媒体为吸烟者提供了对电子烟使用的截然不同的看法。除了使用传统的传播渠道外,电子烟的宣传者还成功地利用社交媒体在吸烟者中推广电子烟。