• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结阳性和高危淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者接受含贝伐珠单抗和不含贝伐珠单抗的辅助化疗后的生活质量。

Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220254. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0254.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0254
PMID:35226083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8886546/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Breast cancer treatment can impact not only short-term health but may also affect longer-term quality of life (QOL).

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate factors associated with diminished QOL following completion of active treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included patients with lymph node-positive or high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer who had undergone definitive surgery and were enrolled in ECOG-ACRIN E5103, a multisite phase 3 trial. A survey was administered 18 months after enrollment to patients enrolled between January and June 2010. Final analysis of the data took place from March to December 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with either bevacizumab or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

QOL and health status assessed with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L), EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer, with arm subscale (FACT-B+4). Groups were compared by Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum, or Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess factors independently associated with FACT-B scores.

RESULTS

Data at 18 months were available from 455 of 519 patients (87.7%) enrolled in the trial. Median (range) age at enrollment was 52 (25-76) years. No differences in QOL (median [range] FACT-B scores: group A, 123 [67-146]; group B, 114 [54-148]; group C, 117 [42-148]; P = .23) or health status (median [range] EQ-5D-3L index scores: group A, 0.83 [0.28-1.00]; group B, 0.83 [0.20-1.00]; group C, 0.83 [0.17-1.00], P = .80; median EQ-VAS: group A, 85 [20-100]; group B, 85 [0-100]; group C, 85 [0-100]; P = .79) were observed across treatment groups; results for subsequent analyses were therefore reported irrespective of primary treatment. Overall, half of patients (258 of 444 [58%]) reported at least some pain or discomfort; 170 (38%) reported symptoms of anxiety or depression. In multivariable analyses, mastectomy with radiation (vs breast conserving surgery) and Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race (vs White race) were associated with lower QOL (mastectomy with radiation: coefficient: -5.5; 95% CI, -10.1 to -0.9; Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race: coefficient: -7.3; 95% CI, -13.2, -1.4).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was not negatively associated with QOL at 18 months. A substantial proportion of participants reported problems related to pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression, demonstrating persistent consequences for physical and psychosocial well-being in this heavily treated population. Many problems reported are amenable to intervention, underscoring the need for timely referral to supportive resources, especially for women of color and those who have more extensive local therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00433511.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/276a/8886546/248ecc47bed8/jamanetwopen-e220254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/276a/8886546/248ecc47bed8/jamanetwopen-e220254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/276a/8886546/248ecc47bed8/jamanetwopen-e220254-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性:乳腺癌治疗不仅会影响短期健康,还可能影响长期生活质量(QOL)。

目的:描述并评估完成积极治疗后生活质量下降的相关因素。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对 ECOG-ACRIN E5103 多中心 III 期临床试验的二次分析,该试验纳入了接受过确定性手术且淋巴结阳性或高危淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的患者。在 2010 年 1 月至 6 月期间入组的患者中,在入组后 18 个月进行了一项调查。最终数据分析于 2021 年 3 月至 12 月进行。

干预措施:患者接受多柔比星、环磷酰胺和紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗或安慰剂辅助治疗。

主要结果和措施:使用欧洲五维健康量表 3 级(EQ-5D-3L)、EQ 视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)和癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌量表,臂亚量表(FACT-B+4)评估 QOL 和健康状况。通过 Fisher 确切检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较组间差异。使用多变量线性回归评估与 FACT-B 评分独立相关的因素。

结果:在该试验中,519 名入组患者中有 455 名(87.7%)在 18 个月时提供了数据。入组时的中位(范围)年龄为 52(25-76)岁。各组间 QOL(中位数[范围]FACT-B 评分:A 组,123[67-146];B 组,114[54-148];C 组,117[42-148];P=0.23)或健康状况(中位数[范围]EQ-5D-3L 指数评分:A 组,0.83[0.28-1.00];B 组,0.83[0.20-1.00];C 组,0.83[0.17-1.00];P=0.80;中位数 EQ-VAS:A 组,85[20-100];B 组,85[0-100];C 组,85[0-100];P=0.79)均无差异;因此,无论主要治疗方式如何,后续分析结果均进行了报告。总的来说,一半的患者(258/444[58%])至少报告了一些疼痛或不适;170 名(38%)报告了焦虑或抑郁症状。多变量分析显示,乳房切除术联合放疗(与保乳手术相比)和亚洲人、黑人或美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(与白人相比)种族与较低的 QOL 相关(乳房切除术联合放疗:系数-5.5;95%CI-10.1 至-0.9;亚洲人、黑人或美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民种族:系数-7.3;95%CI-13.2,-1.4)。

结论和相关性:在这项研究中,贝伐珠单抗联合化疗在 18 个月时与 QOL 无不良关联。相当一部分参与者报告了与疼痛或不适以及焦虑或抑郁相关的问题,这表明在这一接受大量治疗的人群中,身体和社会心理福祉仍存在持续的后果。许多报告的问题是可以干预的,这突显了及时向支持资源转介的必要性,尤其是对于有色人种和接受更广泛局部治疗的患者。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00433511。

相似文献

1
Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.淋巴结阳性和高危淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者接受含贝伐珠单抗和不含贝伐珠单抗的辅助化疗后的生活质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220254. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0254.
2
Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction.保乳与乳房切除术及重建术后乳腺癌患者的长期生活质量。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Association Between 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Score and Locoregional Recurrence Rates in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.21 基因检测复发评分与淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者局部区域复发率的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):505-511. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5559.
4
Quality of life after postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer (SUPREMO): 2-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled trial.中期风险乳腺癌患者保乳术后放疗后的生活质量(SUPREMO):一项随机对照试验的 2 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1516-1529. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30515-1. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab vs High-Dose Interferon or Ipilimumab for Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients With Resected Melanoma: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG S1404 Randomized Clinical Trial.辅助帕博利珠单抗对比高剂量干扰素或伊匹单抗用于改善黑色素瘤患者生活质量的疗效:SWOG S1404 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):251-260. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5486.
6
Comparison of EQ-5D scores among anthracycline-containing regimens followed by taxane and taxane-only regimens for node-positive breast cancer patients after surgery: the N-SAS BC 02 trial.手术后淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者接受含蒽环类药物方案序贯紫杉类与紫杉类单药方案治疗的 EQ-5D 评分比较:N-SAS BC 02 试验。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
7
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma with BRAF or BRAF mutations treated with adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (COMBI-AD): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.接受辅助达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗的切除后高风险黑色素瘤伴 BRAF 或 BRAF 突变患者的患者报告结局(COMBI-AD):一项随机、安慰剂对照、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):701-710. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30940-9. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Association of Circulating Tumor Cells With Late Recurrence of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.循环肿瘤细胞与雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌晚期复发的相关性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1700-1706. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2574.
9
Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的前哨淋巴结手术:ACOSOG Z1071(Alliance)临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278932.
10
Health-related quality of life in axillary node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients undergoing AC versus CMF chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23.接受AC方案与CMF方案化疗的腋窝淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:美国国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目B-23的研究结果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Jul;86(2):153-64. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032983.87966.4e.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Quality of Life Among Patients With Cancer in Saudi Arabia: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.了解沙特阿拉伯癌症患者的生活质量:一项横断面研究的见解。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241263013. doi: 10.1177/10732748241263013.
2
Impact of Spinal CSF Leaks on Quality of Life and Mental Health and Long-Term Reversal by Surgical Closure.脊髓脑脊液漏对生活质量和心理健康的影响以及手术封闭的长期逆转作用
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Apr;14(2):e200272. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200272. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
A meta-analysis of the incidence and risk of skin toxicity with nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel in cancer treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life outcomes for the LEAP study-CALGB 70305 (Alliance): A lymphedema prevention intervention trial for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.LEAP 研究-CALGB 70305(Alliance)的健康相关生活质量结果:一项针对新诊断乳腺癌患者的淋巴水肿预防干预试验。
Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;127(2):300-309. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33184. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of breast cancer one, three, and five years post-diagnosis: a cancer registry-based feasibility study.乳腺癌患者诊断后 1、3、5 年的患者报告结局:一项基于癌症登记的可行性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02652-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇在癌症治疗中皮肤毒性发生率及风险的荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4279-4290. eCollection 2023.
4
Tumor microenvironment enriches the stemness features: the architectural event of therapy resistance and metastasis.肿瘤微环境丰富了干性特征:治疗抵抗和转移的结构事件。
Mol Cancer. 2022 Dec 22;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01682-x.
5
The Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Intervention Alleviates Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer by Modulating Pan-Immune-Inflammation Values.管理癌症与有意义生活(CALM)干预通过调节全免疫炎症值来减轻乳腺癌患者的化疗相关认知障碍。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15347354221140498. doi: 10.1177/15347354221140498.
Treating Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery.
治疗乳腺癌手术后的持续性疼痛。
Drugs. 2020 Jan;80(1):23-31. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01227-5.
4
Double-Blind Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer (E5103).淋巴结阳性和高风险淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者辅助化疗联合和不联合贝伐珠单抗的 III 期双盲试验(E5103)。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2621-2629. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.2028. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Risk stratification for the development of chronic postsurgical pain.慢性术后疼痛发生的风险分层
Pain Rep. 2017 Oct 31;2(6):e627. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000627. eCollection 2017 Nov.
6
Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌幸存者疼痛的危险因素:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Dec;25(12):3607-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3824-3. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Understanding racial differences in health-related quality of life in a population-based cohort of breast cancer survivors.了解基于人群的乳腺癌幸存者队列中与健康相关的生活质量的种族差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):535-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3965-y. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Predictors of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.乳腺癌手术后持续性疼痛的预测因素:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2016 Oct 4;188(14):E352-E361. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151276. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.美国癌症协会/美国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌生存者护理指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):611-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3809. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
Racial disparities in adoption of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphedema risk in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性腋窝哨兵淋巴结活检和淋巴水肿风险的种族差异。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):788-96. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.23.