Fine D H, Mandel I D
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 May;13(5):533-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01502.x.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the traditional clinical criteria are inadequate for: determining active disease sites in periodontitis, monitoring quantitatively the response to therapy or measuring the degree of susceptibility to future breakdown. In an attempt to develop objective measures, a wide variety of studies have been undertaken using saliva, blood, plaque and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) as the specimen source. Examination has included: specific bacteria and their products; host cells and their products (enzymatic and antibacterial, both immunologic and non-immunologic); products of tissue injury derived from local epithelial and connective tissues and bone. Although most of the work to date has failed to provide reliable aids to the clinician, refinements in techniques for sampling and the availability of more sophisticated analytic techniques give cause for optimism. Methods proposed for detection of disease-associated bacteria in subgingival plaque vary in their sensitivity and specificity. Dark field microscopy shows some correlation with existing disease; however, the limited specificity of this method imposes severe restrictions on its usefulness. Highly specific polyclonal and monoclonal antisera to suspected pathogens Bacteroides gingivalis and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans have been developed and improved methods of identification of these microbes in plaque by ELISA immunofluorescence and flow cytometry are under development. With respect to the host response, a strong correlation between antibody patterns to specific bacteria and periodontal disease categories appears to be emerging. Although most studies have focused on serum antibody derived from peripheral blood, a shift to detection of local antibody response appears to be likely. Techniques of measurement that are exquisitely sensitive have been developed for detection of major immune recognition proteins such as antibody and complement in crevicular fluid. Research efforts attempting to correlate local antibody response to local disease activity are underway. Measurement of GCF flow rate, endotoxin, H2S, butyrate and a variety of enzymes (e.g., collagenase, arylsulfatase, B-glucuronidase) show good correlation with levels of gingivitis. In periodontitis, the most promising markers of tissue breakdown are prostaglandins of the E series, the enzymes collagenase and aspartate aminotransferase, sulfated glycosaminoglycans, osteoclastic activating factor and bone resorptive capacity of crevicular cells. Assay of the migration of crevicular leucocytes in vivo can serve as an indicator of a defect in host resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
越来越明显的是,传统的临床标准不足以:确定牙周炎中的活跃疾病部位、定量监测对治疗的反应或测量未来疾病复发的易感性程度。为了开发客观的测量方法,已经进行了各种各样的研究,使用唾液、血液、牙菌斑和龈沟液(GCF)作为样本来源。检测内容包括:特定细菌及其产物;宿主细胞及其产物(酶类和抗菌物质,包括免疫和非免疫的);源自局部上皮组织、结缔组织和骨的组织损伤产物。尽管迄今为止的大多数研究未能为临床医生提供可靠的辅助手段,但采样技术的改进和更先进分析技术的出现带来了乐观的理由。用于检测龈下菌斑中与疾病相关细菌的方法在敏感性和特异性方面各不相同。暗视野显微镜检查显示与现有疾病有一定相关性;然而,该方法有限的特异性严重限制了其用途。已经开发出针对可疑病原体牙龈拟杆菌和伴放线放线杆菌的高特异性多克隆和单克隆抗血清,并且正在开发通过ELISA、免疫荧光和流式细胞术在菌斑中鉴定这些微生物的改进方法。关于宿主反应,针对特定细菌的抗体模式与牙周疾病类型之间似乎正在出现很强的相关性。尽管大多数研究集中在外周血来源的血清抗体上,但似乎有可能转向检测局部抗体反应。已经开发出极其灵敏的测量技术,用于检测龈沟液中的主要免疫识别蛋白,如抗体和补体。试图将局部抗体反应与局部疾病活动相关联的研究工作正在进行。测量龈沟液流速、内毒素、H2S、丁酸盐和多种酶(如胶原酶、芳基硫酸酯酶、β-葡萄糖醛酸酶)显示与牙龈炎水平有良好的相关性。在牙周炎中,最有希望的组织破坏标志物是E系列前列腺素、胶原酶和天冬氨酸转氨酶、硫酸化糖胺聚糖、破骨细胞活化因子以及龈沟细胞的骨吸收能力。体内龈沟白细胞迁移的测定可作为宿主抵抗力缺陷的指标。(摘要截选至400字)