J Adhes Dent. 2022 Mar 1;24:29-38. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2701679.
To evaluate through a systematic review and meta-analysis the bonding performance of adhesive materials to silver diamine fluoride (SDF)-treated dentin.
Studies located in PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus up to September 2020, which compared the bond strength of adhesives (AD) or glass-ionomer cement (GIC) to SDF-treated and untreated (control) dentin were included. Mean differences were estimated separately by material and dentin condition (sound or caries-affected), with a random-effects model, at a 5% significance level.
Twenty-two studies, including 11 new studies not included in our previous systematic review, met the eligibility criteria, and 21 studies were considered in the meta-analyses. SDF dentin pretreatment did not influence the bonding of GIC (Z = 0.53; p = 0.60), independent of dentin condition. SDF treatment significantly impaired the bonding of AD (Z = 2.43; p = 0.01). A rinsing step after SDF eliminated this effect in sound dentin (Z = 1.82; p = 0.07) and increased the bond strength to caries-affected dentin (Z = 2.14; p = 0.03).
SDF pretreatment does not influence the bond strength of GIC. A rinsing step after SDF application can improve the bond strength of AD to caries-affected dentin.
通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估黏结材料与银胺氟化物(SDF)处理牙本质的黏结性能。
在 PubMed、Web of Science、LILACS 和 Scopus 中检索截至 2020 年 9 月的研究,这些研究比较了黏结剂(AD)或玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)与 SDF 处理和未处理(对照)牙本质的黏结强度。根据材料和牙本质状况(健康或龋损)分别采用随机效应模型估计均值差异,显著性水平为 5%。
共纳入 22 项研究,其中包括我们之前系统评价中未包含的 11 项新研究,21 项研究纳入荟萃分析。SDF 牙本质预处理不影响 GIC 的黏结(Z = 0.53;p = 0.60),与牙本质状况无关。SDF 处理显著损害了 AD 的黏结(Z = 2.43;p = 0.01)。SDF 处理后进行冲洗步骤可消除健康牙本质中的这种影响(Z = 1.82;p = 0.07),并增加对龋损牙本质的黏结强度(Z = 2.14;p = 0.03)。
SDF 预处理不影响 GIC 的黏结强度。SDF 处理后进行冲洗步骤可改善 AD 对龋损牙本质的黏结强度。