• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始小梁切除术与Ex-PRESS手术在眼压低于15和18 mmHg方面的手术效果比较:一项回顾性对照研究。

Comparison of surgical outcomes between initial trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS in terms of achieving an intraocular pressure below 15 and 18 mmHg: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Nakakura Shunsuke, Asaoka Ryo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Aboshi Waku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Mar 1;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00279-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40662-022-00279-1
PMID:35227315
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of initial trabeculectomy (Trab) and Ex-PRESS (EX) in terms of achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) below 15 and 18 mmHg.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 64 and 54 cases of Trab and EX, respectively, performed by the same surgeon with uniform management from April 2018 to March 2019. Surgical success was defined as 5 < IOP < 15 mmHg (criterion 1) and 5 < IOP < 18 mmHg (criterion 2) without additional glaucoma medication, needling, and bleb reconstruction 2 months after surgery. Survival analysis with Cox regression was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The Trab and EX groups had an IOP of 22.6 ± 6.2 vs. 21.8 ± 6.0 mmHg before surgery (P = 0.507), 12.6 ± 2.6 vs. 14.0 ± 4.4 mmHg (P = 0.06) at 6 months, 12.7 ± 2.3 vs. 12.9 ± 2.8 mmHg (P = 0.678) at 12 months, 13.3 ± 2.6 vs. 12.6 ± 2.8 mmHg (P = 0.260) at 18 months, and 13.2 ± 2.3 vs. 13.6 ± 2.8 mmHg (P = 0.444) at 24 months, respectively. The proportion of those with an IOP < 15 mmHg in the Trab and EX groups was 82% vs. 81% at 6 months, 68% vs. 62% at 12 months, 63% vs. 61% at 18 months, and 57% vs. 53% at 24 months, respectively. The log-rank test showed no significant difference between the groups for Criteria 1 (P = 0.755) and 2 (P = 0.138). The results of the multivariate logistic analysis identified only a high preoperative IOP as a risk factor for surgical failure (odds ratio for Criteria 1: 1.076, P = 0.009 and Criteria 2: 1.068, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative outcomes of Trab and EX suggested similar ability for achieving an IOP below 15 and 18 mmHg without medications and interventions.

摘要

背景

评估初次小梁切除术(Trab)和Ex-PRESS植入术(EX)在使眼压低于15 mmHg和18 mmHg方面的术后效果。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2018年4月至2019年3月由同一位外科医生进行的、管理统一的64例Trab手术和54例EX手术。手术成功定义为术后2个月时眼压在5 mmHg <眼压< 15 mmHg(标准1)和5 mmHg <眼压< 18 mmHg(标准2)之间,且无需额外的青光眼药物治疗、针刺治疗和滤过泡重建。采用Cox回归进行生存分析,以确定与术后效果相关的因素。

结果

Trab组和EX组术前眼压分别为22.6±6.2 mmHg和21.8±6.0 mmHg(P = 0.507),6个月时分别为12.6±2.6 mmHg和14.0±4.4 mmHg(P = 0.06),12个月时分别为12.7±2.3 mmHg和12.9±2.8 mmHg(P = 0.678),18个月时分别为13.3±2.6 mmHg和12.6±2.8 mmHg(P = 0.260),24个月时分别为13.(此处原文有误,应是13).2±2.3 mmHg和13.6±2.8 mmHg(P = 0.444)。Trab组和EX组眼压< 15 mmHg的比例在6个月时分别为82%和81%,12个月时分别为68%和62%,18个月时分别为63%和61%,24个月时分别为57%和53%。对数秩检验显示,两组在标准1(P = 0.755)和标准2(P = 0.138)方面无显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析结果仅确定术前高眼压是手术失败的危险因素(标准1的比值比:1.076,P = 0.009;标准2的比值比:1.068,P = 0.048)。

结论

Trab和EX的术后效果表明,在无需药物和干预的情况下,二者在使眼压低于15 mmHg和18 mmHg方面能力相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7c/8886939/fdcde94b6034/40662_2022_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7c/8886939/4c48f051b230/40662_2022_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7c/8886939/fdcde94b6034/40662_2022_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7c/8886939/4c48f051b230/40662_2022_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c7c/8886939/fdcde94b6034/40662_2022_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of surgical outcomes between initial trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS in terms of achieving an intraocular pressure below 15 and 18 mmHg: a retrospective comparative study.初始小梁切除术与Ex-PRESS手术在眼压低于15和18 mmHg方面的手术效果比较:一项回顾性对照研究。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Mar 1;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00279-1.
2
Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation.初发正常眼压性青光眼患者行 Ex-PRESS 引流器植入术后眼压控制的影响因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;262(1):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06209-8. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Comparison of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective in vivo confocal microscopy study.原发性开角型青光眼患者中Ex-PRESS植入术与小梁切除术联合白内障超声乳化术的比较:一项回顾性活体共聚焦显微镜研究
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Feb 10;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00278-2.
4
Deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy augmented with Mitomycin C: 2-year post-operative outcomes.深巩膜切除术联合丝裂霉素 C 增强的小梁切除术:2 年术后结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;259(7):1965-1974. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05144-w. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a meta-analysis.Ex-PRESS 植入术与小梁切除术治疗未控制青光眼的Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e63591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063591. Print 2013.
6
Trabeculectomy function after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后小梁切除术的功能
Ophthalmology. 1998 Oct;105(10):1928-35. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91044-2.
7
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open-angle glaucoma.使用 Trabectome 进行的内路小梁旁路手术治疗开角型青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011693.pub3.
8
Comparison of the 1-year postoperative results of phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification-ExPRESS miniature shunt combined surgeries.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合小梁切除术与超声乳化白内障吸除术联合 ExPRESS 微型分流器手术的 1 年术后结果比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;40(6):1517-1529. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01321-8. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery: Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation versus Trabeculectomy.白内障与青光眼手术:内镜睫状体光凝术与小梁切除术对比
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct-Dec;24(4):177-182. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_232_16.
10
Comparison of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS shunt implantation in primary-open-angle-glaucoma patients: A retrospective study.原发性开角型青光眼患者小梁切除术与Ex-PRESS分流管植入术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;5(3):120-123. doi: 10.1016/j.tjo.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Durations and Fees Across Eight Types of Glaucoma Surgery Performed by a Single Surgeon.单一外科医生实施的八种青光眼手术的手术时长和费用对比分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 4;16(1):e51675. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51675. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study.PRESERFLO® MicroShunt 在原发性开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性:来自一项为期 2 年的多中心研究的结果。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.微创青光眼手术:基于证据的综述。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 17;36(8):772-786. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1903513. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
3
Efficacy of Trabeculectomy Combined With Limited Deep Sclerectomy Versus Trabeculectomy Alone: A Randomized-controlled Trial.
单纯小梁切除术与小梁切除术联合局限性深层巩膜切除术疗效的随机对照研究。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Dec 1;30(12):1065-1073. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001896.
4
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After XEN Gel Stent and EX-PRESS Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation.XEN 凝胶支架与 EX-PRESS 青光眼引流装置植入术后临床疗效的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jun 1;30(6):481-488. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001823.
5
Midterm Results of Microhook ab Interno Trabeculotomy in Initial 560 Eyes with Glaucoma.青光眼初诊560眼内微钩小梁切开术的中期结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 17;10(4):814. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040814.
6
Long-term Results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From a Single-center Nonrandomized Study.单中心非随机研究中PRESERFLO微型分流器治疗原发性开角型青光眼患者的长期结果
J Glaucoma. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):281-286. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001734.
7
XEN Gel Stent compared to PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation for primary open-angle glaucoma: two-year results.XEN 凝胶支架与 PRESERFLO™ 微分流管植入治疗原发性开角型青光眼:两年结果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 May;99(3):e433-e440. doi: 10.1111/aos.14602. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Efficacy and safety of XEN®-Implantation vs. trabeculectomy: Data of a "real-world" setting.XEN®-植入术与小梁切除术的疗效和安全性:“真实世界”环境下的数据。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 20;15(4):e0231614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231614. eCollection 2020.
9
Reoperation rates after Ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma: a national database study in Japan.EX-PRESS 引流阀与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型或正常眼压型青光眼的再次手术率:日本全国数据库研究。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Jun;34(6):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0641-6. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Outcomes of Wider Area Bleb Revision Using Bleb Knife With Adjunctive Mitomycin C.使用滤泡刀联合丝裂霉素C进行更大范围滤泡修复的效果
J Glaucoma. 2019 Aug;28(8):732-736. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001282.