Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Psychol Med. 2023 Jun;53(8):3692-3700. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000344. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
Experiences of felt presence (FP) are well documented in neurology, neuropsychology and bereavement research, but systematic research in relation to psychopathology is limited. FP is a feature of sensorimotor disruption in psychosis, hypnagogic experiences, solo pursuits and spiritual encounters, but research comparing these phenomena remains rare. A comparative approach to the phenomenology of FP has the potential to identify shared and unique processes underlying the experience across these contexts, with implications for clinical understanding and intervention.
We present a mixed-methods analysis from three online surveys comparing FP across three diverse contexts: a population sample which included people with experience of psychosis and voice-hearing (study 1, = 75), people with spiritual and spiritualist beliefs (study 2, = 47) and practitioners of endurance/solo pursuits (study 3, = 84). Participants were asked to provide descriptions of their FP experiences and completed questionnaires on FP frequency, hallucinatory experiences, dissociation, paranoia, social inner speech and sleep. Data and code for the study are available via OSF.
Hierarchical linear regression analysis indicated that FP frequency was predicted by a general tendency to experience hallucinations in all three studies, although paranoia and gender (female > male) were also significant predictors in sample 1. Qualitative analysis highlighted shared and diverging phenomenology of FP experiences across the three studies, including a role for immersive states in FP.
These data combine to provide the first picture of the potential shared mechanisms underlying different accounts of FP, supporting a unitary model of the experience.
在神经病学、神经心理学和丧亲研究中,都有关于存在感体验(felt presence,FP)的详细记录,但与精神病理学相关的系统研究却很有限。FP 是精神病、催眠体验、独处追求和精神遭遇中感觉运动障碍的一个特征,但比较这些现象的研究仍然很少。对 FP 现象学进行比较研究有可能确定这些背景下体验的共同和独特过程,这对临床理解和干预具有重要意义。
我们提出了一种混合方法分析,该分析来自三个在线调查,比较了三个不同背景下的 FP:一个包括有精神病和幻听经历的人群样本(研究 1,=75)、有精神和唯灵论信仰的人群(研究 2,=47)以及耐力/独处追求的从业者(研究 3,=84)。参与者被要求提供他们的 FP 体验描述,并完成 FP 频率、幻觉体验、分离、偏执、社交内在言语和睡眠的问卷。该研究的数据和代码可通过 OSF 获得。
层次线性回归分析表明,在所有三个研究中,FP 频率都被普遍存在的幻觉体验倾向所预测,尽管偏执和性别(女性>男性)在样本 1 中也是显著的预测因素。定性分析突出了三个研究中 FP 体验的共享和不同的现象学,包括沉浸式状态在 FP 中的作用。
这些数据结合起来,首次描绘了不同 FP 解释的潜在共同机制,支持了一种体验的单一模型。