Suppr超能文献

头部抬高、颈静脉压迫和呼气末正压通气时儿童上矢状窦压力的变化

Changes in superior sagittal sinus pressure in children with head elevation, jugular venous compression, and PEEP.

作者信息

Grady M S, Bedford R F, Park T S

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1986 Aug;65(2):199-202. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.65.2.0199.

Abstract

Air embolism is a potential hazard during craniotomy whenever intracranial venous pressure is subatmospheric. In order to better understand both the risk of air embolism and its treatment in neurosurgical patients, the authors have investigated the relationship of superior sagittal sinus pressure (SSP) to head position in 15 children and examined the effects of both jugular venous compression and positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) on SSP. Progressive head elevation significantly decreased mean SSP and, in five patients, SSP was less than 0 mm Hg at 90 degrees torso elevation. A PEEP of 10 cm H2O was ineffective in significantly increasing SSP at any degree of head elevation, whereas bilateral internal jugular compression always caused a significant increase in SSP. The authors conclude that children are at risk for venous air embolism when undergoing suboccipital craniectomy in the sitting position because intracranial venous pressure is often subatmospheric when the head is elevated. Furthermore, maintaining PEEP does not appear to be a reliable treatment for increasing SSP, whereas bilateral internal jugular compression is effective.

摘要

每当颅内静脉压低于大气压时,空气栓塞都是开颅手术期间的一种潜在风险。为了更好地理解神经外科患者空气栓塞的风险及其治疗方法,作者研究了15名儿童上矢状窦压力(SSP)与头部位置的关系,并检查了颈静脉压迫和呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对SSP的影响。头部逐渐抬高显著降低了平均SSP,在5名患者中,当躯干抬高90度时,SSP低于0 mmHg。10 cm H2O的PEEP在任何头部抬高角度下均无法显著增加SSP,而双侧颈内静脉压迫总是导致SSP显著增加。作者得出结论,儿童在坐位进行枕下颅骨切除术时存在静脉空气栓塞的风险,因为当头部抬高时颅内静脉压通常低于大气压。此外,维持PEEP似乎不是增加SSP的可靠治疗方法,而双侧颈内静脉压迫是有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验