• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项回顾性队列研究,探讨年龄与医生对无意识患者行或不行快速序贯诱导插管决策的关系。

A retrospective cohort study on association of age and physician decision making for or against rapid sequence intubation in unconscious patients.

机构信息

Division of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06787-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-06787-3
PMID:35228569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885918/
Abstract

In unconscious individuals, rapid sequence intubation (RSI) may be necessary for cardiopulmonary stabilisation and avoidance of secondary damage. Opinions on such invasive procedures in people of older age vary. We thus sought to evaluate a possible association between the probability of receiving prehospital RSI in unconsciousness and increasing age. We conducted a retrospective study in all missions (traumatic and non-traumatic) of the prehospital emergency physician response unit in Graz between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2019, which we searched for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) below 9. Cardiac arrests were excluded. We performed multivariable regression analysis for RSI with age, GCS, independent living, and suspected cause as independent variables. Of the 769 finally included patients, 256 (33%) received RSI, whereas 513 (67%) did not. Unadjusted rates of RSI were significantly lower in older patients (aged 85 years and older) compared to the reference group aged 50-64 years (13% vs. 51%, p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, patients aged 85 years and older were also significantly less likely to receive RSI [OR (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69-0.84)]. We conclude that advanced age, especially 85 years or older, is associated with significantly lower odds of receiving prehospital RSI in cases of unconsciousness.

摘要

在无意识的个体中,为了进行心肺稳定和避免继发损伤,可能需要进行快速序列插管(RSI)。对于老年人进行此类有创操作的意见存在差异。因此,我们试图评估无意识患者接受院前 RSI 的可能性与年龄增长之间的关联。我们对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间格拉茨院前急救医生反应单位的所有任务(创伤性和非创伤性)进行了回顾性研究,我们在这些任务中寻找格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低于 9 分的病例。排除心脏骤停患者。我们将 RSI 与年龄、GCS、独立生活能力和疑似病因作为独立变量进行多变量回归分析。在最终纳入的 769 例患者中,有 256 例(33%)接受了 RSI,而 513 例(67%)未接受 RSI。与参考组(50-64 岁)相比,未调整的 RSI 发生率在年龄较大的患者(85 岁及以上)中明显较低(13%比 51%,p<0.001)。在多变量回归分析中,85 岁及以上的患者接受 RSI 的可能性也显著降低[OR(95%CI)0.76(0.69-0.84)]。我们得出结论,高龄,特别是 85 岁及以上,与无意识患者院前接受 RSI 的可能性显著降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/8885918/caa25a967aeb/41598_2022_6787_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/8885918/a5a571ec626f/41598_2022_6787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/8885918/caa25a967aeb/41598_2022_6787_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/8885918/a5a571ec626f/41598_2022_6787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/8885918/caa25a967aeb/41598_2022_6787_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective cohort study on association of age and physician decision making for or against rapid sequence intubation in unconscious patients.一项回顾性队列研究,探讨年龄与医生对无意识患者行或不行快速序贯诱导插管决策的关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06787-3.
2
The ability of paramedics to predict aspiration in patients undergoing prehospital rapid sequence intubation.护理人员预测院前快速顺序插管患者误吸情况的能力。
J Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.019.
3
The association between field Glasgow Coma Scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubation.接受护理人员快速顺序插管患者的现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与预后的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.012.
4
Temporal changes in blood pressure following prehospital rapid sequence intubation.院前快速顺序插管后血压的时间变化。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jun;39(6):451-456. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210887. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
5
Survival in Out-of-hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation of Non-Traumatic Brain Pathologies.非创伤性脑病理的院外快速序贯插管的存活率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):700-708. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1325952. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
The impact of rapid sequence intubation on trauma patient mortality in attempted prehospital intubation.院前气管插管尝试中快速顺序诱导插管对创伤患者死亡率的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
7
The association of paramedic rapid sequence intubation and survival in out-of-hospital stroke.院前急救快速序贯插管与脑卒中患者院外生存的相关性。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jul;36(7):416-422. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208613. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Comparison of factors associated with desaturation in prehospital emergency anaesthesia in primary and secondary retrievals.院前急诊麻醉中一级和二级转运时与血氧饱和度下降相关因素的比较。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Aug;32(8):642-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202928. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Effect of intensive physician oversight on a prehospital rapid-sequence intubation program.强化医生监督对院前快速序贯气管插管计划的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):310-6. doi: 10.3109/10903121003760200.
10
Prehospital rapid sequence induction by emergency physicians: is it safe?急诊医生在院前进行快速顺序诱导:安全吗?
Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):20-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.20.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic nomogram for elderly patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.预测接受有创机械通气的老年急性呼吸衰竭患者的预后列线图:台湾全国基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 4;10(1):13161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70130-x.
2
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes in the Very Elderly.高龄老人脑出血的预后
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 May;29(5):104695. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104695. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate in an Urban, Supervised, Resident-Staffed Emergency Mobile System: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
城市中由住院医师配备人员并受监督的应急移动系统中的气管插管成功率:一项11年的回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 16;9(1):238. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010238.
4
Association of patient age with first pass success in out-of-hospital advanced airway management.患者年龄与院外高级气道管理初次通过成功率的关联。
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
5
Evaluation of the discriminative performance of the prehospital National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score regarding 48-h mortality.院前国家航空咨询委员会评分对 48 小时死亡率的判别性能评估。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):366-372. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000578.
6
Level 3 guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries : AWMF Register-Nr. 012/019.重度/多发伤患者治疗的三级指南:德国医学专业协会注册编号012/019
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(Suppl 1):3-271. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0922-y.
7
A systematic approach to the unconscious patient.系统地处理无意识患者。
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Feb;18(1):88-92. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-88.
8
The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱对重症监护病房结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1105-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4867-0. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
9
The probability of having advanced medical interventions is associated with age in out-of-hospital life-threatening situations.在院外危及生命的情况下,接受高级医疗干预的概率与年龄相关。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 24;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0294-4.
10
Traumatic brain injury: It is all about definition.创伤性脑损伤:一切都关乎定义。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1194-200. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1187290. Epub 2016 Jul 28.