• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤:一切都关乎定义。

Traumatic brain injury: It is all about definition.

作者信息

Savitsky B, Givon A, Rozenfeld M, Radomislensky I, Peleg K

机构信息

a Israel National Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine Research , Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research , Tel Hashomer , Ramat Gan , Israel.

b Faculty of Medicine , Tel-Aviv University, School of Public Health , Tel-Aviv , Israel.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1194-200. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1187290. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2016.1187290
PMID:27466967
Abstract

BACKGROUND

TBI may be defined by different methods. Some may be most useful for immediate clinical purposes, however less optimal for epidemiologic research. Other methods, such as the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), may prove more beneficial for this task, if the cut-off-points for their categories are defined correctly.

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the optimal cut-off-points for AIS in definition of severity of TBI in order to ensure uniformity between future studies of TBI.

RESULTS

Mortality of patients with TBI AIS 3, 4 was 1.9% and 2.9% respectively, comparing with 31.1% among TBI AIS 5+. Predictive discrimination ability of the model with cut-off-points of 5+ for TBI AIS (in comparison with other cut-off-points) was better. Patients with missing Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the ED had an in-hospital mortality rate of 11.5%. In this group, 25% had critical TBI according to AIS. Normal GCS didn't indicate an absence of head injury, as, among patients with GCS 15 in the ED, 26% had serious/critical TBI injury. Moreover, 7% of patients with multiple injury and GCS 3-8 had another reason than head injury for unconsciousness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study recommends the adoption of an AIS cut-off ≥ 5 as a valid definition of severe TBI in epidemiological studies, while AIS 3-4 may be defined as 'moderate' TBI and AIS 1-2 as 'mild'.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)可以通过不同方法来定义。有些方法可能对即时临床目的最为有用,但对流行病学研究而言并非最佳。其他方法,如简明损伤评分(AIS),如果其类别切点定义正确,可能对这项任务更有益。

目的

揭示AIS在定义TBI严重程度时的最佳切点,以确保未来TBI研究之间的一致性。

结果

TBI AIS 3级、4级患者的死亡率分别为1.9%和2.9%,而TBI AIS 5级及以上患者的死亡率为31.1%。TBI AIS切点为5级及以上的模型(与其他切点相比)预测辨别能力更好。急诊科格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)缺失的患者院内死亡率为11.5%。在该组中,根据AIS,25%的患者患有重度TBI。正常GCS并不表明没有头部损伤,因为在急诊科GCS为15分的患者中,26%患有严重/重度TBI损伤。此外,7%的多发伤且GCS为3 - 8分的患者昏迷的原因不是头部损伤。

结论

本研究建议采用AIS切点≥5作为流行病学研究中重度TBI的有效定义,而AIS 3 - 4级可定义为“中度”TBI,AIS 1 - 2级为“轻度”TBI。

相似文献

1
Traumatic brain injury: It is all about definition.创伤性脑损伤:一切都关乎定义。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1194-200. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1187290. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Diagnostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale for traumatic brain injury in 18,002 patients with severe multiple injuries.格拉斯哥昏迷量表对 18002 例严重多发伤患者颅脑损伤的诊断价值。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Apr;28(4):527-34. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1433. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
4
The effect of age on Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury.年龄对创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jul;149(7):727-34. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.13.
5
Effect of Age on Glasgow Coma Scale in Patients with Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Approach with Propensity Score-Matched Population.年龄对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表的影响:倾向评分匹配人群研究方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 13;14(11):1378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111378.
6
Using the abbreviated injury severity and Glasgow Coma Scale scores to predict 2-week mortality after traumatic brain injury.使用简明损伤定级标准和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分预测创伤性脑损伤后2周死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1172-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822b0f4b.
7
Predictors of Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤预后的预测因素
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:525-529. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
8
Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.与格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比,简明损伤评分和损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤后结局方面的效用。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):946-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000229796.14717.3a.
9
Predictive Utility of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Head Abbreviated Injury Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the National Trauma Registry of Iran.格拉斯哥昏迷量表和头部简明损伤量表在创伤性脑损伤中的预测效用:来自伊朗国家创伤登记处的结果。
Arch Iran Med. 2022 Aug 1;25(8):496-501. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.81.
10
Subdural hematoma as a major determinant of short-term outcomes in traumatic brain injury.硬膜下血肿是创伤性脑损伤短期预后的主要决定因素。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):236-249. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16255. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury Severity Using the Abbreviated Injury Scale and the Injury Severity Score: A Retrospective Study in Two Eastern European Centers.使用简明损伤定级标准和损伤严重度评分评估创伤性脑损伤严重程度:在两个东欧中心开展的一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 4;14(17):6259. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176259.
2
Correlating Various Clinical Outcomes and Associated Dispositions in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的各种临床结局及其相关处置的相关性研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;15(8):1262. doi: 10.3390/life15081262.
3
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: abbreviated injury scale scoring and coding of traumatic axonal injury from early MRI.
中度和重度创伤性脑损伤:早期MRI对创伤性轴索损伤的简明损伤量表评分及编码
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01319-4.
4
Risk factors for rehospitalization after trauma: a follow-up study.创伤后再入院的危险因素:一项随访研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Aug 11;51(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02944-1.
5
Interpreting traumatic brain injury severity: analysis of the correlation between Glasgow coma scale and abbreviated injury scale.解读创伤性脑损伤的严重程度:格拉斯哥昏迷量表与简明损伤定级标准之间的相关性分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 27;51(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02909-4.
6
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.急性创伤性脑损伤成人患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:一项系统综述
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jun 22;10(2):e001691. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001691. eCollection 2025.
7
Biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: narrative review and future prospects in neurointensive care.创伤性脑损伤的生物标志物:叙述性综述及神经重症监护的未来前景
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1539159. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1539159. eCollection 2025.
8
Is there a weekend effect in severe traumatic brain Injury? An observational, population-based study from the Norwegian Trauma registry.严重创伤性脑损伤是否存在周末效应?一项基于挪威创伤登记处的观察性人群研究。
Brain Spine. 2025 Apr 28;5:104263. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104263. eCollection 2025.
9
The determinants for death in hospital following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in Australia.澳大利亚中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的院内死亡决定因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14562. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14562.
10
Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort.严重创伤患者中致死三联征与致死四角的比较:一项多中心队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5.