Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Feb;151(2):1055. doi: 10.1121/10.0009278.
The suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) allows the objective evaluation of cochlear frequency selectivity by determining the suppression tuning curve (STC). Interestingly, some STCs have additional sidelobes at the high frequency flank, which are thought to result from interaction between the probe tone and the cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE being suppressed. Sidelobes are often in regions of other neighboring SOAEs but can also occur in the absence of any other SOAE. The aim of this study was to compare STCs and psychoacoustic tuning curves (PTCs). Therefore, STCs and PTCs were measured in: (1) subjects in which the STC had a sidelobe, and (2) subjects without STC sidelobes. Additionally, PTCs were measured in subjects without SOAEs. Across participant groups, the quality factor Q of the PTCs was similar, independently from whether SOAEs were present or absent. Thus, the presence of an SOAE does not provide enhanced frequency selectivity at the emission frequency. Moreover, both PTC and STC show irregularities, but these are not related in a straightforward way. This suggests that different mechanisms cause these irregularities.
自发耳声发射(SOAEs)的抑制允许通过确定抑制调谐曲线(STC)来客观评估耳蜗频率选择性。有趣的是,一些 STC 在高频侧瓣处具有附加的侧瓣,据认为这是由于探针音与对应于被抑制的 SOAE 的耳蜗驻波之间的相互作用所致。侧瓣通常出现在其他相邻 SOAE 的区域,但也可能在没有任何其他 SOAE 的情况下出现。本研究的目的是比较 STC 和心理声学调谐曲线(PTC)。因此,在以下情况下测量了 STC 和 PTC:(1)STC 具有侧瓣的受试者,和(2)没有 STC 侧瓣的受试者。此外,在没有 SOAEs 的受试者中测量了 PTC。在整个参与者群体中,PTC 的品质因数 Q 相似,与是否存在 SOAEs 无关。因此,SOAE 的存在并不能在发射频率处提供增强的频率选择性。此外,PTC 和 STC 都显示出不规则性,但它们之间没有直接的关系。这表明不同的机制导致了这些不规则性。