Micheyl C, Collet L
Laboratoire de Physiologie Sensorielle Audition et Voix (URA CNRS 1447), Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Scand Audiol. 1994;23(3):171-8. doi: 10.3109/01050399409047504.
With the hypothesis that cochlear active mechanisms are the origin of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and of the high frequency selectivity exhibited by the ear, psychoacoustical tuning curves (PTCs), transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) have been examined in 50 normal hearing subjects. Using a clinical simplified method, PTCs were successively assessed at three frequencies--1, 2 and 4 kHz--in each subject. The results showed the existence of significant differences in the quality of tuning (Q10dB) of the PTCs between, first, subjects having SOAEs and subjects having no SOAEs (Student's t-test; p < 0.05; df = 35) and, second, subjects having large TEOAEs and subjects having small TEOAEs (Student's t-test; p < 0.05; df = 14). Nevertheless, these significant differences did not appear for all the frequencies studied: the frequency selective relationship between PTCs and OAEs mainly involved the 2 kHz zone. Such results are discussed according to the specificities of the clinical method used for PTC measurement as well as to the spectral characteristics of OAEs.
基于耳蜗主动机制是耳声发射(OAEs)及耳朵所表现出的高频选择性的起源这一假设,对50名听力正常的受试者的心理声学调谐曲线(PTCs)、瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAEs)和自发性耳声发射(SOAEs)进行了检测。采用临床简化方法,依次在每个受试者的三个频率——1、2和4千赫——评估PTCs。结果显示,首先,有SOAEs的受试者与没有SOAEs的受试者之间,PTCs的调谐质量(Q10dB)存在显著差异(学生t检验;p<0.05;自由度=35);其次,有大TEOAEs的受试者与有小TEOAEs的受试者之间也存在显著差异(学生t检验;p<0.05;自由度=14)。然而,这些显著差异并非在所有研究频率中都出现:PTCs与OAEs之间的频率选择性关系主要涉及2千赫区域。根据用于PTC测量的临床方法的特殊性以及OAEs的频谱特征对这些结果进行了讨论。