Fangerau Heiner
Department of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Feb 14;9:801333. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.801333. eCollection 2021.
In the years after Ross Harrison published his pivotal paper on nerve fiber regeneration in 1907, researchers following his line of research presented tissue culture techniques as an extremely sensitive, difficult, and almost occult methodology. When Philip R. White published a manual on tissue culturing in 1954, he declared that he wanted to disenchant this formerly mystified field of study. With a similar aim Rhoda Erdmann had published a comparable manual more than 30 years before in 1922. Her intention was to offer a book that would make the method "a common property of those who want to do biological research in the future." When science was about to move from little science to big science, Erdmann tried to democratize tissue culture knowledge. Rhoda Erdmann was in many aspects an extraordinary scholar deviating from the norm. She was one of the few women in the field, working as a low-level assistant at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin before she took the opportunity to work as a research fellow with Ross Harrison in Yale. She was imprisoned during the First World War on the accusation of being a German spy. After she could return to Germany in 1919, she established a laboratory for experimental cell research in Berlin. In 1929 she was one of the first women to be appointed a professor in Germany. The paper focuses Erdmann's attempts at distributing practical tissue culturing knowledge. Based on her and other scholars' research work on nutrient media for cell cultures, and the attempts to optimize these basic tools for different species, this contribution examines the hypothesis that this work constituted an academic niche for underprivileged scientists. The paper analyzes whether Erdmann, due to her extraordinary characteristics, had to use certain niches in the academic world (topics, places, techniques, communities) to pursue her research, and whether her attempts at democratizing her techniques can also be read as an attempt to move out of the niche to gain academic recognition.
1907年罗斯·哈里森发表了关于神经纤维再生的关键论文之后的几年里,沿着他的研究路线开展研究的人员将组织培养技术描述为一种极其敏感、困难且几乎神秘莫测的方法。1954年菲利普·R·怀特出版了一本关于组织培养的手册,他宣称自己想要消除这个曾经神秘化的研究领域的神秘感。早在30多年前的1922年,罗达·埃尔德曼就出版了一本类似的手册。她的目的是提供一本书,让这种方法“成为未来想要进行生物学研究的人的共同财产”。当科学即将从小科学向大科学转变时,埃尔德曼试图使组织培养知识民主化。罗达·埃尔德曼在很多方面都是一位与众不同、偏离常规的学者。她是该领域为数不多的女性之一,在柏林的罗伯特·科赫研究所担任低级助理,之后才有机会到耶鲁大学与罗斯·哈里森一起做研究员。第一次世界大战期间,她因被指控为德国间谍而被捕入狱。1919年她能够返回德国后,在柏林建立了一个用于实验性细胞研究的实验室。1929年,她成为德国首批被任命为教授的女性之一。本文重点关注埃尔德曼在传播实用组织培养知识方面所做的努力。基于她和其他学者在细胞培养营养培养基方面的研究工作,以及为不同物种优化这些基本工具的尝试,本文探讨了这样一种假设,即这项工作为处于不利地位的科学家构成了一个学术小众领域。本文分析了埃尔德曼是否由于自身的特殊特质,不得不利用学术界的某些小众领域(主题、地点、技术、群体)来开展她的研究,以及她使技术民主化的尝试是否也可以被视为试图走出小众领域以获得学术认可的努力。