Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jun 13;114(6):829-836. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac038.
Most persistent poverty counties are rural and contain high concentrations of racial minorities. Cancer mortality across persistent poverty, rurality, and race is understudied.
We gathered data on race and cancer deaths (all sites, lung and bronchus, colorectal, liver and intrahepatic bile duct, oropharyngeal, breast and cervical [females], and prostate [males]) from the National Death Index (1990-1992; 2014-2018). We linked these data to county characteristics: 1) persistent poverty or not; and 2) rural or urban. We calculated absolute (range difference [RD]) and relative (range ratio [RR]) disparities for each cancer mortality outcome across persistent poverty, rurality, race, and time.
The 1990-1992 RD for all sites combined indicated persistent poverty counties had 12.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.37 to 14.09) excess deaths per 100 000 people per year compared with nonpersistent poverty counties; the 2014-2018 RD was 10.99 (95% CI = 10.22 to 11.77). Similarly, the 1990-1992 RR for all sites indicated mortality rates in persistent poverty counties were 1.06 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.07) times as high as nonpersistent poverty counties; the 2014-2018 RR was 1.07 (95% CI = 1.07 to 1.08). Between 1990-1992 and 2014-2018, absolute and relative disparities by persistent poverty widened for colorectal and breast cancers; however, for remaining outcomes, trends in disparities were stable or mixed. The highest mortality rates were observed among African American or Black residents of rural, persistent poverty counties for all sites, colorectal, oropharyngeal, breast, cervical, and prostate cancers.
Mortality disparities by persistent poverty endured over time for most cancer outcomes, particularly for racial minorities in rural, persistent poverty counties. Multisector interventions are needed to improve cancer outcomes.
大多数持久贫困县是农村地区,集中了大量的少数族裔。持久贫困、农村和种族对癌症死亡率的影响研究不足。
我们从国家死亡指数(1990-1992 年;2014-2018 年)收集了种族和癌症死亡数据(所有部位、肺和支气管、结直肠、肝和肝内胆管、口咽、乳腺和宫颈[女性]、前列腺[男性])。我们将这些数据与县特征联系起来:1)是否为持久贫困县;2)是否为农村或城市。我们为每个癌症死亡率结果计算了持久贫困、农村、种族和时间之间的绝对(范围差异[RD])和相对(范围比[RR])差异。
1990-1992 年所有部位综合的 RD 表明,与非持久贫困县相比,持久贫困县每年每 10 万人中有 12.73 人(95%置信区间[CI] = 11.37 至 14.09)的超额死亡;2014-2018 年 RD 为 10.99(95% CI = 10.22 至 11.77)。同样,1990-1992 年所有部位的 RR 表明,持久贫困县的死亡率是非持久贫困县的 1.06 倍(95% CI = 1.05 至 1.07);2014-2018 年 RR 为 1.07(95% CI = 1.07 至 1.08)。在 1990-1992 年至 2014-2018 年期间,结直肠癌和乳腺癌的持久贫困相关的绝对和相对差异扩大;然而,对于其余结果,差异的趋势是稳定或混合的。在所有部位、结直肠、口咽、乳腺、宫颈和前列腺癌中,农村持久贫困县的非洲裔美国或黑人居民的死亡率最高。
对于大多数癌症结局,尤其是农村持久贫困县的少数族裔,持久贫困相关的死亡率差异随着时间的推移而持续存在。需要采取多部门干预措施来改善癌症结局。