R & C Research, Bovezzo (Brescia), Italy.
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Apr 7;8(4):e36022. doi: 10.2196/36022.
Despite the available evidence on its severity, COVID-19 has often been compared with seasonal flu by some conspirators and even scientists. Various public discussions arose about the noncausal correlation between COVID-19 and the observed deaths during the pandemic period in Italy.
This paper aimed to search for endogenous reasons for the mortality increase recorded in Italy during 2020 to test this controversial hypothesis. Furthermore, we provide a framework for epidemiological analyses of time series.
We analyzed deaths by age, sex, region, and cause of death in Italy from 2011 to 2019. Ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression analyses and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) were used to predict the best value for 2020. A Grubbs 1-sided test was used to assess the significance of the difference between predicted and observed 2020 deaths/mortality. Finally, a 1-sample t test was used to compare the population of regional excess deaths to a null mean. The relationship between mortality and predictive variables was assessed using OLS multiple regression models. Since there is no uniform opinion on multicomparison adjustment and false negatives imply great epidemiological risk, the less-conservative Siegel approach and more-conservative Holm-Bonferroni approach were employed. By doing so, we provided the reader with the means to carry out an independent analysis.
Both ARIMA and OLS linear regression models predicted the number of deaths in Italy during 2020 to be between 640,000 and 660,000 (range of 95% CIs: 620,000-695,000) against the observed value of above 750,000. We found strong evidence supporting that the death increase in all regions (average excess=12.2%) was not due to chance (t=7.2; adjusted P<.001). Male and female national mortality excesses were 18.4% (P<.001; adjusted P=.006) and 14.1% (P=.005; adjusted P=.12), respectively. However, we found limited significance when comparing male and female mortality residuals' using the Mann-Whitney U test (P=.27; adjusted P=.99). Finally, mortality was strongly and positively correlated with latitude (R=0.82; adjusted P<.001). In this regard, the significance of the mortality increases during 2020 varied greatly from region to region. Lombardy recorded the highest mortality increase (38% for men, adjusted P<.001; 31% for women, P<.001; adjusted P=.006).
Our findings support the absence of historical endogenous reasons capable of justifying the mortality increase observed in Italy during 2020. Together with the current knowledge on SARS-CoV-2, these results provide decisive evidence on the devastating impact of COVID-19. We suggest that this research be leveraged by government, health, and information authorities to furnish proof against conspiracy hypotheses that minimize COVID-19-related risks. Finally, given the marked concordance between ARIMA and OLS regression, we suggest that these models be exploited for public health surveillance. Specifically, meaningful information can be deduced by comparing predicted and observed epidemiological trends.
尽管有大量证据表明其严重性,但 COVID-19 仍经常被一些阴谋论者甚至科学家与季节性流感相提并论。在意大利大流行期间,人们就 COVID-19 与观察到的死亡之间是否存在非因果关系展开了各种公开讨论。
本文旨在寻找 2020 年意大利记录的死亡率上升的内在原因,以检验这一有争议的假设。此外,我们还为时间序列的流行病学分析提供了一个框架。
我们分析了 2011 年至 2019 年意大利按年龄、性别、地区和死因分类的死亡人数。使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)线性回归分析和自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)来预测 2020 年的最佳值。使用 Grubbs 1 单侧检验来评估预测和观察到的 2020 年死亡人数/死亡率之间的差异是否具有统计学意义。最后,使用 1 个样本 t 检验将区域超额死亡人数与零均值进行比较。使用 OLS 多元回归模型评估死亡率与预测变量之间的关系。由于对多比较调整没有统一的意见,而且假阴性意味着存在巨大的流行病学风险,因此我们采用了不太保守的 Siegel 方法和更保守的 Holm-Bonferroni 方法。通过这样做,我们为读者提供了进行独立分析的手段。
ARIMA 和 OLS 线性回归模型都预测 2020 年意大利的死亡人数在 640,000 到 660,000 之间(95%CI 范围:620,000-695,000),而实际观察到的死亡人数超过 750,000。我们发现强有力的证据支持所有地区的死亡人数增加(平均超额=12.2%)不是偶然的(t=7.2;调整后的 P<.001)。男性和女性的全国死亡率超额分别为 18.4%(P<.001;调整后的 P=.006)和 14.1%(P=.005;调整后的 P=.12)。然而,我们发现使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较男性和女性死亡率残差时,意义有限(P=.27;调整后的 P=.99)。最后,死亡率与纬度呈强烈正相关(R=0.82;调整后的 P<.001)。在这方面,2020 年死亡率的增加在不同地区之间存在很大差异。伦巴第大区的死亡率增幅最高(男性 38%,调整后的 P<.001;女性 31%,P<.001;调整后的 P=.006)。
我们的研究结果支持意大利 2020 年死亡率上升不存在内在原因的说法。结合目前对 SARS-CoV-2 的了解,这些结果提供了 COVID-19 具有破坏性影响的决定性证据。我们建议政府、卫生和信息部门利用这些研究结果来驳斥那些将 COVID-19 相关风险最小化的阴谋论。最后,鉴于 ARIMA 和 OLS 回归之间的显著一致性,我们建议利用这些模型进行公共卫生监测。具体来说,通过比较预测和观察到的流行病学趋势,可以得出有意义的信息。