• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的研究估计了荷兰和美国早期乳腺癌患者接受辅助全身治疗的过度治疗情况。

Population-based estimates of overtreatment with adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer patients with data from the Netherlands and the USA.

机构信息

Department of Radiology/Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):161-173. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06550-2. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-022-06550-2
PMID:35239071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8993748/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) helps increase breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), there is a growing concern for overtreatment. By estimating the expected BCSS of AST using PREDICT, this study aims to quantify the number of patients treated with AST without benefit to provide estimates of overtreatment.

METHODS

Data of all non-metastatic unilateral breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2015 were retrieved from cancer registries from The Netherlands and the USA. The PREDICT tool was used to estimate AST survival benefit. Overtreatment was defined as the proportion of patients that would have survived regardless of or died despite AST within 10 years. Three scenarios were evaluated: actual treatment, and recommendations by the Dutch or USA guidelines.

RESULTS

59.5% of Dutch patients were treated with AST. 6.4% (interquartile interval [IQI] = 2.5, 8.2%) was expected to survive at least 10 years due to AST, leaving 93.6% (IQI = 91.8, 97.5%) without AST benefit (overtreatment). The lowest expected amount of overtreatment was in the targeted and chemotherapy subgroup, with 86.5% (IQI = 83.4, 89.6%) overtreatment, and highest in the only endocrine treatment subgroup, with 96.7% (IQI = 96.0, 98.1%) overtreatment. Similar results were obtained using data from the USA, and guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Based on PREDICT, AST prevents 10-year breast cancer death in 6.4% of the patients treated with AST. Consequently, AST yields no survival benefit to many treated patients. Especially improved personalization of endocrine therapy is relevant, as this therapy is widely used and is associated with the highest amount of overtreatment.

摘要

目的

尽管辅助全身治疗(AST)有助于提高乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS),但人们越来越担心过度治疗。本研究旨在通过使用 PREDICT 估计 AST 的预期 BCSS,从而量化接受 AST 治疗但无获益的患者数量,以提供过度治疗的估计值。

方法

从荷兰和美国的癌症登记处检索了 2015 年诊断的所有非转移性单侧乳腺癌患者的数据。使用 PREDICT 工具估计 AST 生存获益。过度治疗定义为在 10 年内无论是否接受 AST 治疗都将存活或因 AST 而死亡的患者比例。评估了三种情况:实际治疗以及荷兰或美国指南的建议。

结果

59.5%的荷兰患者接受了 AST 治疗。预计有 6.4%(四分位间距 [IQI] = 2.5,8.2%)的患者因 AST 至少存活 10 年,这意味着 93.6%(IQI = 91.8,97.5%)的患者未从 AST 中获益(过度治疗)。在靶向和化疗亚组中,预期过度治疗的程度最低,为 86.5%(IQI = 83.4,89.6%),在仅内分泌治疗亚组中,预期过度治疗的程度最高,为 96.7%(IQI = 96.0,98.1%)。使用来自美国的数据和指南建议也得到了类似的结果。

结论

根据 PREDICT,AST 可预防接受 AST 治疗的患者中有 6.4%在 10 年内死于乳腺癌。因此,AST 对许多接受治疗的患者没有生存获益。特别是内分泌治疗的个体化改进具有重要意义,因为这种治疗方法广泛应用,与最高程度的过度治疗相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/687e9e68cb8a/10549_2022_6550_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/3d56b56cb78e/10549_2022_6550_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/996cca4215ef/10549_2022_6550_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/687e9e68cb8a/10549_2022_6550_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/3d56b56cb78e/10549_2022_6550_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/996cca4215ef/10549_2022_6550_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/8993748/687e9e68cb8a/10549_2022_6550_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Population-based estimates of overtreatment with adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer patients with data from the Netherlands and the USA.基于人群的研究估计了荷兰和美国早期乳腺癌患者接受辅助全身治疗的过度治疗情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):161-173. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06550-2. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
Adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer: impact of guideline changes and clinicopathological factors associated with nonadherence at a nation-wide level.早期乳腺癌的辅助全身治疗:全国范围内指南变更及与不依从相关的临床病理因素的影响
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):357-65. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3940-7. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
The influence of socioeconomic status and ethnicity on adjuvant systemic treatment guideline adherence for early-stage breast cancer in the Netherlands.社会经济地位和种族对荷兰早期乳腺癌辅助全身治疗指南依从性的影响。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1970-1978. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx204.
4
Calibration and discriminatory accuracy of prognosis calculation for breast cancer with the online Adjuvant! program: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study.使用在线辅助!程序对乳腺癌预后计算进行校准和鉴别准确性评估:一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1070-6. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70254-2. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
5
Population-Based Study on Cancer Subtypes, Guideline-Concordant Adjuvant Therapy, and Survival Among Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer.基于人群的Ⅰ-Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者肿瘤亚型、与指南一致的辅助治疗与生存分析的研究
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):676-686. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7272.
6
Outcome without any adjuvant systemic treatment in stage I ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients included in the MINDACT trial.MINDACT 试验中纳入的 I 期 ER+/HER2- 乳腺癌患者在没有任何辅助全身治疗的情况下的结局。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):310-320. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.014. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者全身治疗耐药概述。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1-22. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_1.
8
Adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in patients with node-positive, luminal A type breast cancer.淋巴结阳性的腔面A型乳腺癌患者单纯辅助内分泌治疗。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(22):e6777. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006777.
9
Do T1a breast cancers profit from adjuvant systemic therapy? A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 325 T1a-patients.T1a期乳腺癌患者能从辅助性全身治疗中获益吗?一项针对325例T1a期患者的多中心回顾性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Aug;294(2):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4016-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
[Adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with resectable breast cancer: guideline from the Dutch National Breast Cancer Platform and the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology].[可切除乳腺癌患者的辅助全身治疗:荷兰国家乳腺癌平台和荷兰医学肿瘤学会指南]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 May 20;144(21):984-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjuvant endocrine therapy and risk of contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.辅助内分泌治疗与对侧乳腺癌风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Feb;36(2):107-126. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01900-5. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Deconstructing neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in early breast cancer: lack of prognostic utility and biological correlates across tumor subtypes.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在早期乳腺癌中的解构:在肿瘤亚型中缺乏预后价值和生物学相关性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jun;205(3):475-485. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07286-x. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age.70 基因特征作为早期乳腺癌治疗决策的辅助手段:MINDACT 三期随机试验的更新结果,附有按年龄进行的探索性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):476-488. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00007-3. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Evaluation of the Use of Cancer Registry Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research.癌症登记数据用于比较有效性研究的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011985. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11985.
3
External validation of the PREDICT tool in Spanish women with breast cancer participating in population-based screening programmes.
Effects of fear of cancer recurrence on subjective physical and mental health in breast cancer patients: The intermediary role of heart rate variability.
恐惧癌症复发对乳腺癌患者主观身心健康的影响:心率变异性的中介作用。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):16570-16579. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6250. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Abemaciclib in Early Breast Cancer Patients: One Size Fits All or Tailoring to Patients' Needs?阿贝西利在早期乳腺癌患者中的成本效益:一刀切还是按需定制?
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Feb 16;15:147-161. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S387375. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical and Biological Aspects of Disseminated Tumor Cells and Dormancy in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中播散肿瘤细胞与休眠的临床及生物学特性
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Jun 28;10:929893. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.929893. eCollection 2022.
在参与基于人群的筛查计划的西班牙乳腺癌女性中对 PREDICT 工具进行外部验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):873-880. doi: 10.1111/jep.13084. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data.利用苏格兰癌症登记处的数据对 PREDICT 乳腺癌预后预测工具在 45789 名患者中的独立验证。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):808-814. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.基于 21 基因表达检测的乳腺癌辅助化疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
6
An application of restricted mean survival time in a competing risks setting: comparing time to ART initiation by injection drug use.受限平均生存时间在竞争风险环境下的应用:比较注射吸毒者开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的时间。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0484-z.
7
Reducing Overtreatment of Cancer With Precision Medicine: Just What the Doctor Ordered.利用精准医学减少癌症过度治疗:正是医生所需要的。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1091-1092. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0018.
8
Comparison of the Performance of 6 Prognostic Signatures for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.比较 6 种用于预测雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的预后标志物的性能:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):545-553. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5524.
9
Development and External Validation of Prediction Models for 10-Year Survival of Invasive Breast Cancer. Comparison with PREDICT and CancerMath.发展和验证预测浸润性乳腺癌 10 年生存率的模型,并与 PREDICT 和 CancerMath 进行比较。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2110-2115. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3542. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population.在线预测工具PREDICT v. 2.0在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Nov 5.