Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与黏菌素治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科菌血症的疗效比较。

Effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;109:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.079. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial treatments for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) bacteremia are limited, with colistin-based regimens being a primary therapy. Ceftazidime-avibactam is an emerging treatment for various CRE infections. Our study aimed to assess ceftazidime-avibactam effectiveness compared with colistin in patients with CRE bacteremia.

METHODS

This retrospective, multi-centre study included adult patients with CRE bacteremia treated with ceftazidime-avibactam or colistin, between September 1, 2017 and December 1, 2020, at two tertiary centres in Saudi Arabia. The risk of 14-day mortality was compared between recipients of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin, using Cox multivariable regression, adjusted for Pitt score, Charlson index score, and treatment with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive agents.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients were enrolled; 32 received ceftazidime-avibactam, and 29 received colistin. The adjusted risk for 14-day mortality was lower in the ceftazidime-avibactam group than the colistin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.99; p = 0.049), while the crude 14-day mortality did not differ between the two antibiotics (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.21-1.66; p = 0.32). The clinical success rate was higher with the use of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin (46.8% versus 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with a lower risk of 14-day mortality than colistin in patients with CRE bacteremia.

摘要

简介

治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)菌血症的抗菌药物有限,多粘菌素类药物是主要治疗方法。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦是一种新兴的治疗各种 CRE 感染的药物。我们的研究旨在评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与多粘菌素在 CRE 菌血症患者中的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心研究,纳入了 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 1 日期间在沙特阿拉伯的两家三级中心接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦或多粘菌素治疗的 CRE 菌血症成年患者。使用 Cox 多变量回归比较头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组与多粘菌素组 14 天死亡率的风险,调整了 Pitt 评分、Charlson 指数评分以及化疗和免疫抑制药物治疗。

结果

共纳入 61 例患者,其中 32 例接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗,29 例接受多粘菌素治疗。与多粘菌素组相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组 14 天死亡率的调整风险较低(风险比[HR]0.32;95%置信区间[CI]0.10-0.99;p=0.049),而两种抗生素的 14 天死亡率无差异(HR 0.59;95%CI 0.21-1.66;p=0.32)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的临床成功率高于多粘菌素(分别为 46.8%和 20.4%;p=0.047)。

结论

与多粘菌素相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗 CRE 菌血症患者的 14 天死亡率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验