Xiao Yunxiao, Li Jiexiao, Wu Zhenghao, Zhang Ximeng, Ming Jie
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Gland Surg. 2022 Jan;11(1):77-90. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-677.
In metastatic breast cancer patients, the site of metastasis and prognosis are related to the molecular subtype of breast cancer. There are few relevant reports to explore the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of different single positive hormone receptor subtypes [estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)- and ER-/PR+] of metastatic breast cancer.
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015.We analyzed the metastatic patterns and prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative breast cancer patients. Cox analysis was used to analyze the influence of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR+ on the prognosis of patients in different subgroups and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with single hormone receptor positivity.
We included 206,187 breast cancer patients, including 7,726 stage IV patients. The loss of ER was a protective factor against bone metastasis (P<0.001) and a risk factor for visceral metastasis (P<0.001). The ER-/PR+ subtype had a similar proportion of metastatic breast cancer, and similar clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Single PR positivity was an independent risk factor for cancer specific survival (CSS) in multi-visceral metastasis subgroup comparing to TNBC. Meanwhile, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) between ER-/PR+ and ER-/PR- patients in all breast cancer patients or in stage IV breast cancer patients. Age [hazard ratio (HR) =2.16], grade (HR =2.36), T stage (T4: HR =3.24), lymph node metastasis (>10: HR =4.33), distant metastasis (HR =4.99), and no chemotherapy or an unknown (HR =1.65) were high-risk factors but surgery (HR <0.5) were protective factors for CSS in ER-/PR+ patients.
ER-/PR+ subtype had a high proportion of stage IV patients. Meanwhile, such subtype breast cancer had similar clinicopathological characteristics, metastatic models (prefers to visceral metastasis), similar even worse prognosis compared with TNBC.
在转移性乳腺癌患者中,转移部位和预后与乳腺癌的分子亚型有关。关于转移性乳腺癌不同单阳性激素受体亚型[雌激素受体(ER)+/孕激素受体(PR)-和ER-/PR+]的临床病理及预后特征的相关报道较少。
利用2010年至2015年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库。我们分析了人表皮生长因子受体2(HER-2)阴性乳腺癌患者的转移模式和预后。采用Cox分析来分析ER+/PR-和ER-/PR+对不同亚组患者预后的影响以及影响单激素受体阳性患者预后的危险因素。
我们纳入了206187例乳腺癌患者,其中包括7726例IV期患者。ER缺失是骨转移的保护因素(P<0.001),是内脏转移的危险因素(P<0.001)。ER-/PR+亚型的转移性乳腺癌比例、临床病理特征及预后与三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)相似。与TNBC相比,单PR阳性是多内脏转移亚组中癌症特异性生存(CSS)的独立危险因素。同时,在所有乳腺癌患者或IV期乳腺癌患者中,ER-/PR+和ER-/PR-患者的总生存(OS)或乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)无显著差异。年龄[风险比(HR)=2.16]、分级(HR =2.36)、T分期(T4:HR =3.24)、淋巴结转移(>10:HR =4.33)、远处转移(HR =4.99)以及未进行化疗或情况不明(HR =1.65)是ER-/PR+患者CSS的高危因素,但手术(HR <0.5)是保护因素。
ER-/PR+亚型的IV期患者比例较高。同时,该亚型乳腺癌具有相似的临床病理特征、转移模式(倾向于内脏转移),与TNBC相比预后相似甚至更差。