Murra Dalia, Hilde Kathryn L, Fitzpatrick Anne, Maras Pamela M, Watson Stanley J, Akil Huda
Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Neurobiol Stress. 2022 Feb 12;17:100437. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100437. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Evaluating and coping with stressful social events as they unfold is a critical strategy in overcoming them without long-lasting detrimental effects. Individuals display a wide range of responses to stress, which can manifest in a variety of outcomes for the brain as well as subsequent behavior. Chronic Social Defeat Stress (CSDS) in mice has been widely used to model individual variation following a social stressor. Following a course of repeated intermittent psychological and physical stress, mice diverge into separate populations of social reactivity: resilient (socially interactive) and susceptible (socially avoidant) animals. A rich body of work reveals distinct neurobiological and behavioral consequences of this experience that map onto the resilient and susceptible groups. However, the range of factors that emerge over the course of defeat have not been fully described. Therefore, in the current study, we focused on characterizing behavioral, physiological, and neuroendocrine profiles of mice in three separate phases: before, during, and following CSDS. We found that following CSDS, traditional read-outs of anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors do not map on to the resilient and susceptible groups. By contrast, behavioral coping strategies used during the initial social stress encounter better predict which mice will eventually become resilient or susceptible. In particular, mice that will emerge as susceptible display greater escape behavior on Day 1 of social defeat than those that will emerge as resilient, indicating early differences in coping mechanisms used between the two groups. We further show that the social avoidance phenotype in susceptible mice is specific to the aggressor strain and does not generalize to conspecifics or other strains, indicating that there may be features of threat discrimination that are specific to the susceptible mice. Our findings suggest that there are costs and benefits to both the resilient and susceptible outcomes, reflected in their ability to cope and adapt to the social stressor.
在压力性社会事件发生时对其进行评估和应对,是克服这些事件且不产生长期有害影响的关键策略。个体对压力表现出广泛的反应,这可能在大脑以及后续行为中表现为各种不同的结果。小鼠的慢性社会挫败应激(CSDS)已被广泛用于模拟社会应激源后的个体差异。经过一系列反复的间歇性心理和生理应激后,小鼠会分化为具有不同社会反应性的群体: resilient(具有社会互动性)和susceptible(具有社会回避性)的动物。大量的研究工作揭示了这种经历在resilient和susceptible群体中所产生的不同神经生物学和行为后果。然而,在挫败过程中出现的一系列因素尚未得到充分描述。因此,在当前的研究中,我们专注于刻画小鼠在三个不同阶段(CSDS之前、期间和之后)的行为、生理和神经内分泌特征。我们发现,在CSDS之后,传统的焦虑样和抑郁样行为指标并不能区分resilient和susceptible群体。相比之下,在最初的社会应激遭遇期间所采用的行为应对策略,能更好地预测哪些小鼠最终会变得resilient或susceptible。特别是,在社会挫败第1天表现出更大逃避行为的小鼠,最终会成为susceptible,这表明两组小鼠在应对机制上存在早期差异。我们进一步表明,susceptible小鼠的社会回避表型特定于攻击菌株,不会推广到同种或其他菌株,这表明susceptible小鼠可能具有特定的威胁辨别特征。我们的研究结果表明,resilient和susceptible这两种结果都有成本和收益,这体现在它们应对和适应社会应激源的能力上。