van der Weijst Lotte, Lievens Yolande, Surmont Veerle, Schrauwen Wim
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 16;21:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy. Objective NCF data was collected with six psychometrically validated neurocognitive tests. Subjective NCF was assessed with the cognitive domain of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items. Psychological toxicity data was collected with the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Meaningful clinical important differences were determined for changes in NCF. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.01). In total, 50 patients were recruited. At baseline, 13 (26%) patients had an impaired objective NCF. Over time, deterioration was seen in 11% (n = 3), 5% (n = 1) and 6% (n = 1) of patients at 2-3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The OS of patients with a normal NCF at baseline was longer than those with an impaired baseline NCF (29.5 vs 17.1 months). No statistical significance has been reached between NCF and OS (p = .353) nor NCF and DFS (p = .251). Objective NCF was not correlated with subjective NCF (p = .193), nor anxiety (p = .504), depression (p = .513), memory problems (p = .813) and concentration problems (p = .813). Systemic treatment and loco-regional radiotherapy may have a temporarily negative impact on NCF in a small proportion of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Baseline NCF could be a predictor for OS.
这项观察性队列研究调查了局部晚期和转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在接受局部区域放疗和/或全身治疗时的神经认知功能(NCF)及其与总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和患者报告的心理毒性之间的关联。通过六项经过心理测量学验证的神经认知测试收集客观NCF数据。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30项中的认知领域评估主观NCF。通过患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准结局版本收集心理毒性数据。确定了NCF变化的有意义的临床重要差异。使用单变量Cox比例风险模型和广义线性模型确定统计学显著性(p < 0.01)。总共招募了50名患者。基线时,13名(26%)患者的客观NCF受损。随着时间的推移,治疗后2 - 3个月、6个月和12个月时,分别有11%(n = 3)、5%(n = 1)和6%(n = 1)的患者出现恶化。基线时NCF正常的患者的OS长于基线NCF受损的患者(29.5个月对17.1个月)。NCF与OS(p = 0.353)以及NCF与DFS(p = 0.251)之间均未达到统计学显著性。客观NCF与主观NCF(p = 0.193)、焦虑(p = 0.504)、抑郁(p = 0.513)、记忆问题(p = 0.813)和注意力问题(p = 0.813)均无相关性。全身治疗和局部区域放疗可能会对一小部分局部晚期和转移性NSCLC患者的NCF产生暂时的负面影响。基线NCF可能是OS的一个预测指标。