Iyer Rajesh Shankar, Sunny Anita Ann, Jaranraj Nisha, Govindaraj Uma, Dhandapani Manjula
Department of Neurology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Statistics, PSG College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2022 Feb 10;18:100528. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2022.100528. eCollection 2022.
Caregivers of adults (CG-A) and caregivers of children (CG-C) may differ in their knowledge, attitude and behavior and hence their education requirements during epilepsy counseling could vary. This study compares the current knowledge, attitudes, behavior during a seizure, presence of myths surrounding epilepsy and ability to recognize seizures among a sample of CG-A and CG-C. Caregivers of children and adult patients with minimum 6 months history of epilepsy were enrolled. Information was collected using a questionnaire about clinical and demographic details and five domains (KAP-plus); knowledge, attitude, behavior, presence of myths and a video data for identification of focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). There were 132 CG-A and 127 CG-C. CG-C were younger and better educated compared to CG-A (formal education of 64.6% vs 44.7% = 0.001). CG-A and CG-C were comparable in the knowledge and attitude domains. CG-A scored less than CG-C in the domains of behavior (15.5 vs 16.8 = <0.001), myths (15.4 vs 16.2 = 0.002), video recognition of FIAS and GTCS (0.7 vs 0.94 = 0.001) and KAP-plus score (22.9 vs 24.6 = 0.017). The knowledge-behavior or knowing-doing gap, knowledge-faith gap and knowledge-recognition gaps existed more among CG-A compared to CG-C. Focused education strategies are required to bridge the gap among CG-A.
成年患者的照料者(CG - A)和儿童患者的照料者(CG - C)在知识、态度和行为方面可能存在差异,因此他们在癫痫咨询期间的教育需求也可能不同。本研究比较了CG - A和CG - C样本在癫痫发作时的当前知识、态度、行为、围绕癫痫的误区的存在情况以及识别癫痫发作的能力。纳入了有至少6个月癫痫病史的儿童和成年患者的照料者。使用一份关于临床和人口统计学细节以及五个领域(KAP加)的问卷收集信息;知识、态度、行为、误区的存在情况以及用于识别局灶性意识障碍性发作(FIAS)和全面性强直阵挛发作(GTCS)的视频数据。有132名CG - A和127名CG - C。与CG - A相比,CG - C更年轻且受教育程度更高(正规教育程度分别为64.6%和44.7%,P = 0.001)。CG - A和CG - C在知识和态度领域具有可比性。在行为领域(15.5对16.8,P <0.001)、误区领域(15.4对16.2,P = 0.002)、FIAS和GTCS的视频识别领域(0.7对0.94,P = 0.001)以及KAP加评分(22.9对24.6,P = 0.017)方面,CG - A的得分低于CG - C。与CG - C相比,CG - A中知识 - 行为或知 - 行差距、知识 - 信念差距和知识 - 识别差距更为明显。需要有针对性的教育策略来弥合CG - A之间的差距。