• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牵引车-挂车对轻型车辆尾部碰撞的意义。

Significance of tractor-trailer impacts to the rear of light vehicles.

机构信息

ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Exponent Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(4):169-175. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2033974. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2022.2033974
PMID:35244522
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the type of striking vehicle or object associated with serious injury to at least 1 occupant in the vehicle struck in the rear.

METHOD

The 1990-2015 NASS-CDS was analyzed for light vehicles involved in rear crashes. The type of vehicle struck in the rear resulting in serious injury to at least 1 occupant was determined. Rear impacts were identified with GAD1 = B without rollover (rollover ≤ 0). Vehicles with serious to maximum injury were identified as VAIS 3 to 6 (VAIS 3+). The type of striking vehicle or object was determined for the rear impacts causing serious injury. The risk and relative risk for serious injury were determined. Review of electronic cases was conducted for light vehicles with serious injury (VAIS 3+) in impacts by tractor-trailers or large trucks.

RESULTS

The highest risk for serious injury to an occupant in the struck vehicle was from a tractor-trailer or large truck (2.71%), followed by a fixed object (1.49%) and van (1.00%). The average risk was 0.33%. The relative risk was 8.2 times for impact with a tractor-trailer or large truck and 4.5 times for impact with a fixed object. The highest risk impacts with a fixed object were rear impacts into a tree/bush (3.57%) and pole (2.90%). Tractor-trailers and large trucks accounted for 16.2% of serious injury in struck vehicles, followed by fixed objects at 12.9%; the 2 accounted for 29.1% of serious injury to occupants of struck vehicles. The case review identified 22 tractor-trailer and 1 large truck crashes involving 31 seriously injured occupants in the struck vehicle. There were 2 general crash scenarios associated with serious injury. One involved intrusion deforming the occupant compartment. The other involved vehicle accelerations sufficient to seriously injure an occupant in the struck vehicle without significant deformation to the occupant compartment.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insight into the striking vehicle or object associated with serious injury to light vehicle occupants in rear impacts. Tractor-trailer impacts into the rear of a vehicle involved a high risk for serious injury in the struck vehicle. The use of collision mitigation technologies, such as forward collision warning or automatic emergency braking, on the tractor-trailer may support better speed control and lead to lower closing velocities of rear impacts to light vehicles.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与至少 1 名车内乘员严重受伤相关的撞击车辆或物体的类型,这些乘员位于被撞击车辆的后部。

方法

对 1990-2015 年 NASS-CDS 中涉及后碰撞的轻型车辆进行分析。确定导致至少 1 名车内乘员严重受伤的被撞击车辆的类型。通过 GAD1=B 无翻车(翻车≤0)识别后碰撞。将车辆严重至最大损伤定义为 VAIS 3 至 6(VAIS 3+)。确定造成严重受伤的后碰撞中撞击车辆或物体的类型。确定严重受伤的风险和相对风险。对轻型车辆因拖拉机拖车或大型卡车碰撞而导致严重受伤(VAIS 3+)的电子病例进行了审查。

结果

被撞击车辆中乘员严重受伤的最高风险来自拖拉机拖车或大型卡车(2.71%),其次是固定物体(1.49%)和货车(1.00%)。平均风险为 0.33%。与拖拉机拖车或大型卡车碰撞的相对风险为 8.2 倍,与固定物体碰撞的相对风险为 4.5 倍。与固定物体碰撞的最高风险是后碰撞进入树木/灌木(3.57%)和电线杆(2.90%)。拖拉机拖车和大型卡车占被撞击车辆严重受伤的 16.2%,其次是固定物体占 12.9%;两者共占被撞击车辆乘员严重受伤的 29.1%。病例审查确定了 22 起涉及 31 名被撞击车辆中严重受伤乘客的拖拉机拖车和 1 起大型卡车事故。有 2 种一般碰撞情况与严重受伤有关。一种涉及侵入物使乘员舱变形。另一种涉及车辆加速,足以使被撞击车辆中的乘员严重受伤,而乘员舱没有明显变形。

结论

本研究提供了有关轻型车辆后部碰撞中与车内乘员严重受伤相关的撞击车辆或物体的见解。拖拉机拖车撞击车辆后部导致被撞击车辆严重受伤的风险很高。在拖拉机拖车上使用碰撞缓解技术,如前向碰撞警告或自动紧急制动,可能有助于更好地控制速度,并降低轻型车辆后部碰撞的闭合速度。

相似文献

1
Significance of tractor-trailer impacts to the rear of light vehicles.牵引车-挂车对轻型车辆尾部碰撞的意义。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(4):169-175. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2033974. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts.FMVSS 301 修订版的有效性:FARS 和 NASS-CDS 对后碰撞中死亡和重伤的分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
3
Potential benefits of underride guards in large truck side crashes.大型卡车侧面碰撞中防钻入装置的潜在好处。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):592-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.666595.
4
Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.前方碰撞预警和自动紧急制动对涉及皮卡车的追尾事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(4):293-298. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2176191. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?前方碰撞预防系统在预防涉及卡车和摩托车被撞的追尾事故方面效果是否较差?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):440-444. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2321910. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
6
Rear seat safety: Variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics.后排座椅安全:乘客、碰撞和车辆特征对保护效果的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Rear-seat occupant demographics in rear impacts: Analysis of NASS-CDS.后碰撞中后排乘客特征:NASS-CDS 分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(3):218-223. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1871474. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Effect of cargo loading on occupant injury and seat deformation in motor-vehicle crashes.货物装载对汽车碰撞中乘员伤害和座椅变形的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(8):835-43. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.894996.
9
Association Between NCAP Ratings and Real-World Rear Seat Occupant Risk of Injury.新车评估计划(NCAP)评级与现实世界中后排乘客受伤风险之间的关联
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S146-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061664.
10
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.在配备高强度重量比(SWR)车顶、窗帘式和侧面安全气囊以及其他安全改进措施的车辆中的翻滚损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of ESC (electronic stability control) on tree and pole impacts with focus on rear impacts.电子稳定控制系统(ESC)对树木和电线杆碰撞的影响,重点关注后部碰撞。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37591. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.