Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者体育锻炼干预参与度与功能能力之间的关联:对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Association Between Physical Exercise Interventions Participation and Functional Capacity in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Pfeifer Lucinéia Orsolin, De Nardi Angélica Trevisan, da Silva Larissa Xavier Neves, Botton Cíntia Ehlers, do Nascimento Daniela Meirelles, Teodoro Juliana Lopes, Schaan Beatriz D, Umpierre Daniel

机构信息

Exercise Pathophysiology Research Laboratory, Graduate Program in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Exercise Pathophysiology Research Laboratory, Clinical Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, RS, 21301, Brazil.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2022 Mar 4;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00422-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus increases with age, and people with type 2 diabetes are more affected by reductions in functional performance. Although exercise interventions are recommended for people with diabetes, it is relevant to assess the effects of different training modes on the available functional outcomes. Therefore, our purpose was to systematically assess the effect of different physical exercise modalities in patients with type 2 diabetes with an average age of 45 years or older on outcomes used to measure functional capacity.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials was conducted. Seven databases were searched from January 1987 to December 2021 (PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and in grey literature: Open Grey and Google Scholar). Eligible studies should last 8 weeks or longer, comparing structured exercise training and non-exercise control for one out of six pre-specified functional capacity outcomes (Timed Up and Go test, chair stands, walking performance, upper-limb muscle strength, lower-limb muscle strength, physical fitness parameter), in patients with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥ 45 years. The risk of bias was assessed with the Downs & Black checklist. Pooled mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model, followed by sensitivity and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 18,112 references retrieved, 29 trials (1557 patients) were included. Among these, 13 studies used aerobic training, 6 studies used combined training, 4 studies used resistance training, 3 studies had multiple intervention arms and 3 studies used other types of training. Exercise training was associated with an increase in functional capacity outcomes, as reflected by changes in 6-min walk test (n = 8) [51.6 m; 95% CI 7.6% to 95.6%; I 92%], one-repetition maximum leg-press (n = 3) [18.0 kg; 95% CI 4.0% to 31.9%; I 0%], and maximum oxygen consumption (VO) (n = 20) [2.41 mL/kg·min; 95% CI 1.89% to 2.92%; I 100%] compared with control groups. In sensitivity and subgroup analyses using VO as outcome and stratified by type of study (randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials), duration of diabetes diagnosis, and sex, we observed overlapping confidence intervals. Meta-regression showed no association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels and VO [p = 0.34; I 99.6%; R = 2.6%]. In addition, the quality of the included studies was mostly low.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that structured physical exercise programs might improve functional capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes, except for the upper-limb muscle strength. However, we could not identify potential effect predictors associated with directional summary estimates. Trial registration This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020162467); date of registration: 12/15/2019. The review protocol is hosted at the Open Science Framework (OSF) (Preprint https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kpg2m ).

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病的患病率随年龄增长而增加,2型糖尿病患者受身体机能下降的影响更大。尽管推荐糖尿病患者进行运动干预,但评估不同训练模式对现有机能指标的影响仍具有重要意义。因此,我们的目的是系统评估不同体育锻炼方式对平均年龄45岁及以上的2型糖尿病患者机能指标的影响。

方法

对对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了1987年1月至2021年12月的7个数据库(PubMed、物理治疗证据数据库、Cochrane图书馆、SPORTDiscus,以及灰色文献:Open Grey和谷歌学术)。纳入的研究应持续8周或更长时间,比较2型糖尿病患者(年龄≥45岁)在六项预先指定的机能指标(计时起立行走测试、椅子站立、步行能力、上肢肌肉力量、下肢肌肉力量、体能参数)中的一项上进行结构化运动训练与非运动对照的效果。采用唐斯和布莱克清单评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型计算合并平均差异,随后进行敏感性和元回归分析。

结果

在检索到的18112篇参考文献中,纳入了29项试验(1557例患者)。其中,13项研究采用有氧运动训练,6项研究采用联合训练,4项研究采用抗阻训练,3项研究有多个干预组,3项研究采用其他类型的训练。运动训练与机能指标的改善相关,6分钟步行试验(n = 8)[51.6米;95%CI 7.6%至95.6%;I² 92%]、一次最大腿举(n = 3)[18.0千克;95%CI 4.0%至31.9%;I² 0%]和最大摄氧量(VO₂)(n = 20)[2.41毫升/千克·分钟;95%CI 1.89%至2.92%;I² 100%]与对照组相比均有变化。在以VO₂为指标并按研究类型(随机和非随机对照临床试验)、糖尿病诊断时长和性别分层的敏感性和亚组分析中,我们观察到置信区间有重叠。元回归显示糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)水平与VO₂之间无关联[p = 0.34;I² 99.6%;R² = 2.6%]。此外,纳入研究的质量大多较低。

结论

结果表明,结构化体育锻炼计划可能改善2型糖尿病患者的机能指标,但上肢肌肉力量除外。然而,我们未能确定与方向性汇总估计相关的潜在效应预测因素。试验注册本系统评价已在PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42020162467)注册;注册日期:2019年12月15日。评价方案存于开放科学框架(OSF)(预印本https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kpg2m )。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac14/8897547/f17f3464ecb5/40798_2022_422_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验