Suppr超能文献

脑炎型加利福尼亚血清型正粘病毒在神经侵袭和保护性固有免疫途径方面的差异。

Differences in neuroinvasion and protective innate immune pathways between encephalitic California Serogroup orthobunyaviruses.

机构信息

Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Pathog. 2022 Mar 4;18(3):e1010384. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010384. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

The California serogroup (CSG) of Orthobunyaviruses comprises several members capable of causing neuroinvasive disease in humans, including La Crosse orthobunyavirus (LACV), Jamestown Canyon orthobunyavirus (JCV), and Inkoo orthobunyavirus (INKV). Despite being genetically and serologically closely related, their disease incidences and pathogenesis in humans and mice differ. We have previously shown that following intraperitoneal inoculation of weanling mice, LACV was highly pathogenic while JCV and INKV were not. To determine why there were differences, we examined the ability of these viruses to invade the CNS and compared the host innate immune responses that regulated viral pathogenesis. We found that LACV was always neuroinvasive, which correlated with its high level of neuroinvasive disease. Interestingly, JCV was not neuroinvasive in any mice, while INKV was neuroinvasive in most mice. The type I interferon (IFN) response was critical for protecting mice from both JCV and INKV disease, although in the periphery JCV induced little IFN expression, while INKV induced high IFN expression. Despite their differing neuroinvasive abilities, JCV and INKV shared innate signaling components required for protection. The presence of either cytoplasmic Rig-I-Like Receptor signaling or endosomal Toll-Like Receptor signaling was sufficient to protect mice from JCV or INKV, however, inhibition of both pathways rendered mice highly susceptible to neurological disease. Comparison of IFN and IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) responses to INKV in the brains of resistant wild type (WT) mice and susceptible immune knockout mice showed similar IFN responses in the brain, but WT mice had higher ISG responses, suggesting induction of key ISGs in the brain is critical for protection of mice from INKV. Overall, these results show that the CSG viruses differ in neuroinvasiveness, which can be independent from their neuropathogenicity. The type I IFN response was crucial for protecting mice from CSG virus-induced neurological disease, however, the exact correlates of protection appear to vary between CSG viruses.

摘要

加利福尼亚血清群(CSG)正布尼亚病毒包括几种能够引起人类神经侵袭性疾病的成员,包括拉科罗塞病毒(LACV)、詹姆斯敦峡谷病毒(JCV)和因科病毒(INKV)。尽管它们在基因和血清学上密切相关,但它们在人类和小鼠中的疾病发生率和发病机制不同。我们之前已经表明,在对断奶小鼠进行腹腔接种后,LACV 具有高度致病性,而 JCV 和 INKV 则没有。为了确定为什么存在差异,我们检查了这些病毒侵袭中枢神经系统的能力,并比较了调节病毒发病机制的宿主固有免疫反应。我们发现 LACV 总是神经侵袭性的,这与其高神经侵袭性疾病相关。有趣的是,JCV 在任何小鼠中都没有神经侵袭性,而 INKV 在大多数小鼠中具有神经侵袭性。I 型干扰素(IFN)反应对于保护小鼠免受 JCV 和 INKV 疾病至关重要,尽管 JCV 在周围组织中诱导的 IFN 表达很少,而 INKV 诱导的 IFN 表达很高。尽管它们具有不同的神经侵袭能力,但 JCV 和 INKV 具有保护所必需的固有信号成分。细胞质 Rig-I 样受体信号或内体 Toll 样受体信号的存在足以保护小鼠免受 JCV 或 INKV 的侵害,然而,抑制这两种途径会使小鼠极易患神经疾病。对抵抗型野生型(WT)小鼠和易感免疫敲除小鼠大脑中 INKV 的 IFN 和 IFN 刺激基因(ISG)反应进行比较,发现大脑中的 IFN 反应相似,但 WT 小鼠的 ISG 反应更高,这表明诱导大脑中的关键 ISG 对于保护小鼠免受 INKV 的侵害至关重要。总的来说,这些结果表明 CSG 病毒在神经侵袭性方面存在差异,这与其神经致病性无关。I 型 IFN 反应对于保护小鼠免受 CSG 病毒引起的神经疾病至关重要,然而,确切的保护相关性似乎在 CSG 病毒之间有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbe/8926202/3cc588171394/ppat.1010384.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验