Suppr超能文献

股腘段血流动力学评估:使用ROC曲线分析对比压力法和多普勒法

Haemodynamic assessment of the femoropopliteal segment: comparison of pressure and Doppler methods using ROC curve analysis.

作者信息

Baker A R, Evans D H, Prytherch D R, Bell P R

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1986 Jul;73(7):559-62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730714.

Abstract

Combined aorto-iliac and femoropopliteal vascular disease remains a problem in vascular surgery. Arteriography does not provide information on the relative contributions of the two lesions to the presenting symptoms. Aorto-iliac haemodynamics may reveal occult aorto-iliac disease but does not show whether combined proximal and distal reconstruction will be required to provide symptomatic relief. Haemodynamic assessment of both segments may help in this respect. A haemodynamic assessment of the femoropopliteal segment of 72 limbs in 38 patients is reported. The segmental pressure drop between a common femoral arterial cannula and a below-knee occlusion cuff is compared with a non-invasive Doppler method combining both transit time and damping factor. Comparison is made using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The measurement of segmental pressure drop is more accurate than the Doppler method in detection of femoropopliteal stenoses of greater than 50 per cent of the luminal diameter (P less than 0.05).

摘要

腹主动脉-髂动脉和股动脉-腘动脉联合血管疾病仍是血管外科的一个难题。动脉造影术无法提供关于这两种病变对当前症状相对影响的信息。腹主动脉-髂动脉血流动力学可能揭示隐匿性腹主动脉-髂动脉疾病,但无法表明是否需要进行近端和远端联合重建以缓解症状。在这方面,对两个节段进行血流动力学评估可能会有所帮助。本文报告了对38例患者72条肢体的股动脉-腘动脉节段进行的血流动力学评估。将股总动脉插管与膝下阻塞袖带之间的节段性压力降与结合了通过时间和阻尼因子的非侵入性多普勒方法进行比较。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析进行比较。在检测管腔直径狭窄超过50%的股动脉-腘动脉狭窄时,节段性压力降测量比多普勒方法更准确(P小于0.05)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验