Department of Marketing & Consumer Studies, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Family Relations & Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Appetite. 2022 Jun 1;173:105978. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105978. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Although nudging has been found to promote the choice of healthy foods in lab studies and ad-hoc field studies, relatively little research is available regarding effectiveness in real food venues that operate for profit. The paucity of empirical studies providing "proof of implementation" reveals the difficulty of applying previous empirical findings on nudging to mass-eating food services contexts, which serve meals to a lot of individuals daily. Based on the typology of choice architecture in food choice contexts, we closely collaborated with the in-house food service operator to devise and implement five nudge interventions to promote fruits and vegetables (FV) in university cafeterias. Each study was conducted for one 12-week semester or more over a three-year period. In the first two studies, non-verbal point-of-purchase prompting increased the choice of kale/spinach supplemented smoothies and whole fruits from baskets. In Study 3, the combination of sizing and point-of-purchase non-verbal prompting increased the sale of large size vegetable-rich bowls from a stir-fry grill. In Study 4, the proximity type of nudging by altering the position of the healthier option in a sandwich bar in combination with non-verbal prompting increased the sale of sandwiches containing spinach. In Study 5, the combination of sizing and proximity of large vs. small sized plates and serving spoons had no effect on sale of self-serve items in a salad bar. All the interventions except for Study 5 produced a moderate effect in increasing the choice of FV-rich items. We recommend that hospitality and food service operators consider operational parameters and simultaneously adopt more than one nudging components to achieve a sizable effect. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to implement choice architecture techniques in collaboration with food service companies.
尽管在实验室研究和特定实地研究中发现了推动选择健康食品的推动作用,但关于在盈利性实际食品场所的有效性的研究相对较少。实证研究提供“实施证明”的缺乏揭示了将以前关于推动的实证发现应用于为大量个人提供日常用餐的大规模餐饮服务环境的困难。基于食品选择背景下选择架构的类型学,我们与内部餐饮服务运营商密切合作,设计并实施了五项推动干预措施,以在大学自助餐厅中推广水果和蔬菜(FV)。每项研究都在三年期间的一个 12 周学期或更长时间内进行。在前两项研究中,非语言的购买点提示增加了补充有羽衣甘蓝/菠菜的冰沙和整个水果的选择。在研究 3 中,尺寸和购买点非语言提示的组合增加了蔬菜丰富碗的大尺寸销售,这些碗来自炒菜烤架。在研究 4 中,通过改变三明治吧中更健康选项的位置并结合非语言提示来推动接近类型,增加了含有菠菜的三明治的销售量。在研究 5 中,大/小尺寸的盘子和勺子的大小和接近度的组合对沙拉吧中的自助服务项目的销售没有影响。除了研究 5 之外,所有干预措施都对增加 FV 丰富食品的选择产生了中等影响。我们建议酒店和餐饮服务运营商考虑运营参数,并同时采用多种推动因素来实现可观的效果。需要进行未来的随机对照试验,以便与餐饮服务公司合作实施选择架构技术。