Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114833. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114833. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
While immigrants in the US suffer poor access to healthcare in general, access within immigrant populations varies notably by legal status and employment. Intersections between immigration, employment, and healthcare policy have shaped immigrants' access or exclusion from healthcare; however, little research has examined how immigrants experience and navigate these intersections. Drawing on social exclusion theory and the theory of bounded agency, we aimed to investigate Mexican and Chinese immigrants' experiences of exclusion from healthcare as one key dimension of social exclusion-and how this was shaped by interactions with the institutions of immigration and employment. The examination of two ethnic immigrant groups who live under the same set of policies allows for a focus on the common impacts of policy. We selected Mexican and Chinese immigrants as the two largest subgroups in California's Latinx and Asian immigrant population. We use a policy lens to analyze qualitative data from the mixed-methods Research on Immigrant Health and State Policy (RIGHTS) Study, involving 60 in-depth interviews with Mexican and Chinese immigrants in California between August 2018-August 2019. We identified two primary themes: pathways of social exclusion and access, and strategies used to address social exclusion. Findings show that immigrants' exclusion from healthcare is fundamentally linked to legal status and employment, and that immigrants navigate difficult choices between opportunities for improved employment and changes in legal status. We argue that multiple categories of legal status affect immigrants' employment opportunities and social position, which, in turn, translates to stratified healthcare access. Our findings support the literature establishing legal status as a mechanism of social stratification but challenge legal-illegal binary paradigms.
在美国,移民总体上难以获得医疗保健服务,而移民群体中的医疗保健服务获取情况因合法身份和就业状况而有显著差异。移民、就业和医疗保健政策之间的交叉点塑造了移民获得或被排除在医疗保健之外的机会;然而,很少有研究调查移民如何体验和应对这些交叉点。本研究借鉴社会排斥理论和有限代理理论,旨在调查墨西哥和中国移民被排除在医疗保健之外的经历,这是社会排斥的一个关键维度——以及这种经历是如何受到移民和就业机构之间相互作用的影响。对生活在同一套政策下的两个族裔移民群体的考察,可以关注政策的共同影响。我们选择墨西哥和中国移民作为加利福尼亚州拉丁裔和亚洲移民群体中最大的两个亚群。我们使用政策视角分析了 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月期间在加利福尼亚州进行的混合方法“移民健康与州政策研究”(RIGHTS)研究中 60 名墨西哥和中国移民的深入访谈的定性数据。我们确定了两个主要主题:社会排斥和获取途径,以及解决社会排斥问题所采用的策略。研究结果表明,移民被排除在医疗保健之外的根本原因是合法身份和就业,移民在改善就业机会和改变合法身份之间做出了艰难的选择。我们认为,多种类别的合法身份影响了移民的就业机会和社会地位,进而导致医疗保健服务的分层获取。我们的研究结果支持了将合法身份作为社会分层机制的文献,但也挑战了合法-非法二分法的范式。