Rehabilitation in Health Research Center (CIRES), Universidad de Las Americas, Santiago, Chile.
Faculty of Health, Therapeutic Process Department, Temuco Catholic University, Temuco, Chile.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jan;29:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common condition that causes pain and disability in adults over 50 years old. The application of acupuncture, as a method of complementary intervention, could be beneficial for pain relief and knee function in patients with knee OA.
Analyze the effectiveness of acupuncture versus control interventions in patients with knee OA.
An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science and LILACS databases. The eligibility criteria for selecting systematic reviews included clinical trials that compared acupuncture versus control interventions for pain intensity in patients with knee OA.
A total of 15 systematic reviews met the eligibility criteria for the quantitative synthesis. In the short term, the mean difference (MD) for pain intensity was -0.32 cm (95% CI = -0.57 to -0.08, p = 0.01). There was a very low quality of evidence according to the GRADE rating. In the short term, the mean difference (MD) for knee function was -8.74 points (95% CI = -13.36 to -4.12, p ≤ 0.001). There was low quality of evidence according to the GRADE rating. All differences were in favor of acupuncture.
At short-term, there was low to very low evidence and there were statistically significant differences in pain intensity and knee function in favor of acupuncture versus control interventions in patients with knee OA. However, these differences were not clinically important. For the acupuncture versus sham, in the short-term, no differences clinical neither statistically significant to favor of acupuncture in pain intensity and knee function.
膝骨关节炎(OA)是导致 50 岁以上成年人疼痛和残疾的最常见疾病。针灸作为一种补充干预措施的应用,可能对膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛缓解和膝关节功能有益。
分析针灸与对照干预措施在膝骨关节炎患者中的疗效。
通过 MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE、PEDro、Cochrane 中心、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 LILACS 数据库进行电子检索。选择系统评价的纳入标准包括比较针灸与对照干预措施治疗膝骨关节炎患者疼痛强度的临床试验。
共有 15 项系统评价符合定量综合的纳入标准。在短期,疼痛强度的平均差异(MD)为-0.32cm(95%CI=-0.57 至-0.08,p=0.01)。根据 GRADE 评级,证据质量为极低。在短期,膝关节功能的平均差异(MD)为-8.74 分(95%CI=-13.36 至-4.12,p≤0.001)。根据 GRADE 评级,证据质量为低。所有差异均有利于针灸。
在短期,有低到极低的证据表明,针灸与对照干预措施相比,膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛强度和膝关节功能有统计学显著差异,但这些差异无临床意义。对于针灸与假针灸相比,在短期,在疼痛强度和膝关节功能方面,没有临床或统计学意义上有利于针灸的差异。