Araya-Quintanilla Felipe, Ramirez-Vélez Robinson, Mendez-Rebolledo Guillermo, Cuyul-Vásquez Iván, Arce-Álvarez Alexis, Ezzatvar Yasmin, Gutiérrez-Espinoza Héctor
Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Navarrabiomed-IdiSNA, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Pamplona, Spain.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Aug 20;16:1759720X241271775. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241271775. eCollection 2024.
The use of acupuncture is related to patients' expectations, and the therapeutic interaction effect remains a topic of debate in the literature. Accordingly, it is still unclear whether acupuncture can generate positive clinical effects in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).
To determine the effectiveness of acupuncture versus placebo for clinical outcomes and determine the overall effect not attributed to specific effects in patients with FM.
Umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses.
An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus databases from inception until December 2023. We selected studies with a clinical diagnosis of FM and that analyzed the effectiveness of acupuncture compared with a placebo. Pain intensity, functional status, fatigue, sleep quality, and depression symptoms were assessed. Effect sizes were calculated as the mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD). The quality of intervention reporting was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
Eleven SRs with 8399 participants were included. Compared with placebo, acupuncture was associated with reductions in pain intensity (MD = -1.13 cm, 95% CI -2.09 to -0.17, < 0.001), physical function (SMD = -0.63, 95% CI -1.67 to 0.41, = 0.06), sleep quality (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI -1.39 to 0.88, = 0.06), and fatigue (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, < 0.001). The proportion not attributable to specific effects (PCE) of acupuncture was 58% for pain intensity (PCE = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.71), 57% for physical function (PCE = 0.57, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.20), and 69% for fatigue (PCE = 0.69, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.21).
Acupuncture showed a statistically significant difference in decreased pain intensity and fatigue in women with FM. However, the certainty of evidence was low to very low; its effects are not clinically important, and more than 50% of the overall treatment effects were not attributed to the specific effects of acupuncture.
CRD42023487315.
针灸的使用与患者的期望有关,而治疗互动效果在文献中仍是一个有争议的话题。因此,目前尚不清楚针灸对纤维肌痛(FM)患者是否能产生积极的临床效果。
确定针灸与安慰剂相比对临床结局的有效性,并确定FM患者中不能归因于特定效应的总体效果。
系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析的伞状评价。
从数据库建立至2023年12月,在MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、科学网、CENTRAL、EMBASE、LILACS、CINAHL、PEDro和SPORTDiscus数据库中进行电子检索。我们选择了临床诊断为FM且分析了针灸与安慰剂相比有效性的研究。评估了疼痛强度、功能状态、疲劳、睡眠质量和抑郁症状。效应量计算为平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法评估干预报告的质量。
纳入了11项SRs,共8399名参与者。与安慰剂相比,针灸与疼痛强度降低(MD = -1.13 cm,95%CI -2.09至-0.17,P < 0.001)、身体功能(SMD = -0.63,95%CI -1.67至0.41,P = 0.06)、睡眠质量(SMD = -0.25,95%CI -1.39至0.88,P = 0.06)和疲劳(SMD = 0.20,95%CI = 0.17至0.22,P < 0.001)有关。针灸不能归因于特定效应(PCE)的比例,疼痛强度为58%(PCE = 0.58,95%CI 0.45至0.71),身体功能为57%(PCE = 0.57,95%CI -0.07至1.20),疲劳为69%(PCE = 0.69,95%CI 0.18至1.21)。
针灸在降低FM女性的疼痛强度和疲劳方面显示出统计学上的显著差异。然而,证据的确定性为低至极低;其效果在临床上并不重要,且超过50%的总体治疗效果不能归因于针灸的特定效应。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023487315。